Liberal Forum

Vegas » 24 Apr 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 2:45 pm

Post why you are owed 123 dodges. 

I'll give you a hint: 

Step 1.  ask Veghead a question
Step 2: Veghead responds to the question with a question
Step 3. Bring Veghead back to the original question
Step 4. Veghead then accuses you for not answering his question while he continues to evade the original question. 

No one reads that ****.
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Apr 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 2:47 pm

No one reads that ****.

You will close your eyes to anything that corners you. Tough **** - not my problem

Step 1.  ask Veghead a question
Step 2: Veghead responds to the question with a question
Step 3. Bring Veghead back to the original question
Step 4. Veghead then accuses you for not answering his question while he continues to evade the original question. 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Apr 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 2:44 pm

You never answered it.


You can stop pretending you have any idea, no one believes you.
 

Like you have a faithful following. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 9:51 am

To whose thread are we referring?

       

My "prescience"

1. He still wont make a case as to why anyone is obligated to answer stupid questions. 

Vegas » 26 Apr 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2025, 10:16 am

       

My "prescience"

1. He still wont make a case as to why anyone is obligated to answer stupid questions.

Until you answer, you can hold your questions. 

Blackvegetable » 26 Apr 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2025, 12:41 pm

Until you answer, you can hold your questions.

As predicted. You make no case as to why anyone is obligated to answer a stupid question. 

I literally predicted that you would say what you just said ^^^.

Idiot.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 9:51 am

To whose thread are we referring?

      As you would say "Post the title of the thread."

You dumb mother ****. Just stupid. 

Vegas » 27 Apr 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 9:35 am

      As you would say "Post the title of the thread."

You dumb mother ****. Just stupid.

Whom do you think you're kidding?

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 9:41 am

Whom do you think you're kidding?

Oh look. A question. How unlike you to hide. 

You should figure out how to get off of step 4 first. 


 

Vegas » 27 Apr 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 9:43 am

Oh look. A question. How unlike you to hide. 

You should figure out how to get off of step 4 first.

Another dodge...

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 9:41 am

Whom do you think you're kidding?

A fool doesn't know they haven't fooled anyone else since everyone is ignoring actual life in the mean time every reality unites against anyone understanding their natural time limits adapting in space daily here.

it has been going on for over 2,025 years and one week what humans will do to anyone debunking humanity globally. Always by collective choice.

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 9:45 am

Another dodge...

You are owed 126 dodges.

Ask yourself why. 


Step 4 continues. 

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 9:41 am

Whom do you think you're kidding?

Here, I'll help you out. Let's do this in steps:

Grifticles’ Official Step-by-Step Guide to Discovering Whose Thread You’re In:

 Step 1:
Locate the top of the thread, right where your rage-fueled vision usually starts to blur.
Step 2:
Read the title. Yes, that part with bigger text. It’s not just there for decoration, promise.
Step 3:
Immediately below the title, you’ll notice a name. That's the author. It’s the person who actually created the thread—not some mystery ghost haunting your browser.
Step 4:
Cross-reference this name against the list of people you’ve been spamming with goat references and copy/pasted tantrums all morning. (Hint: It’s probably one of them.)
Step 5:
Congratulations! You have now discovered whose thread it is without needing to:

• Post another stall question
• Quote someone from 2017
• Declare yourself the forum’s Socratic Martyr

Historical Fact:
Historians agree this discovery is only slightly less significant than the invention of the wheel, and far more significant than anything Grifticles has contributed since 2017.

Would you like a printable version he can tape to his monitor?
Because at this point, it’s almost a public service.
 

Vegas » 27 Apr 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 10:12 am

Here, I'll help you out. Let's do this in steps:

Grifticles’ Official Step-by-Step Guide to Discovering Whose Thread You’re In:

 Step 1:
Locate the top of the thread, right where your rage-fueled vision usually starts to blur.
Step 2:
Read the title. Yes, that part with bigger text. It’s not just there for decoration, promise.
Step 3:
Immediately below the title, you’ll notice a name. That's the author. It’s the person who actually created the thread—not some mystery ghost haunting your browser.
Step 4:
Cross-reference this name against the list of people you’ve been spamming with goat references and copy/pasted tantrums all morning. (Hint: It’s probably one of them.)
Step 5:
Congratulations! You have now discovered whose thread it is without needing to:

• Post another stall question
• Quote someone from 2017
• Declare yourself the forum’s Socratic Martyr

Historical Fact:
Historians agree this discovery is only slightly less significant than the invention of the wheel, and far more significant than anything Grifticles has contributed since 2017.

Would you like a printable version he can tape to his monitor?
Because at this point, it’s almost a public service.

If I posted a link to this tomorrow, would you read it?

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 10:32 am

If I posted a link to this tomorrow, would you read it?

And a question.       

Ask yourself why you are owed 126 dodges. 

Actually...you would probably dodge your own question even. 

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 10:32 am

If I posted a link to this tomorrow, would you read it?

If you posted it tomorrow, today, or 500 years from now, the answer would still be no.
I don't waste time rereading my own brilliance just because you’re too scared to produce any of your own.
Maybe try posting something you actually think for once—assuming that's even possible without a crutch.

Vegas » 27 Apr 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 10:38 am

If you posted it tomorrow, today, or 500 years from now, the answer would still be no.
I don't waste time rereading my own brilliance just because you’re too scared to produce any of your own.
Maybe try posting something you actually think for once—assuming that's even possible without a crutch.

It wasn't worth sobbing into your laptop.

Blackvegetable » 27 Apr 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 11:15 am

It wasn't worth sobbing into your laptop.

Speak for yourself. Nobody else cares about what you say.

Vegas » 27 Apr 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 12:37 pm

Speak for yourself. Nobody else cares about what you say.

I find the BV content informative.. But he does get lost in the rabbit hole of the debate over how to debate.  That's a MAGA diversion tactic from what really are the quarks of the matter.

JohnnyYou » 27 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm

I find the BV content informative.. But he does get lost in the rabbit hole of the debate over how to debate.  That's a MAGA diversion tactic from what really are the quarks of the matter.

One must keep these idiots focused, otherwise it's Rhetorical Anarchy..