Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
Peanut Gallery
‹
R: Admitting you're wrong, Learning from it, Moving on.
R: Admitting you're wrong, Learning from it, Moving on.
By Deezer Shoove
22 Apr 2025 6:45 am in Peanut Gallery
22 Apr 2025 6:45 am
Is it possible to expect people to show the weakness of being wrong? Or changing their view?
We have posters here that, from I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.
We have posters here that, from I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
22 Apr 2025 5:22 pm
Anyone serving a reality isn't neutral about how evolving actually happens in plain sight. Almost every mind follows a faith life exceeds adapting eternally separated by genetic position alive now as traditionally believed over the last 400 generation gaps lived in time debating anything else is possible.Deezer Shoove » 22 Apr 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Is it possible to expect people to show the weakness of being wrong? Or changing their view?
We have posters here that, from what I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.
those that challenge humanity as a whole disappear one way or another. Ignored, shunned, exiled, executed, by the minority in charge of what majority believes true, from day in and to day out.
22 Apr 2025 7:20 pm
*Huey » 22 Apr 2025, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ The difference between you and I is I admit when I am wrong. In the very instance you do admit you are wrong it is not because you are rarely wrong. It took you MONTHS, literally months, to adit PK was a mistake. You ran and ran from that one. You still have not admitted Biden was wrong, was lying, make the 5x comment. And you still have not admitted it was not a gun in pieces.
That is just to name a few. You blame others, you lie, and basically are a dishonest POS. If your daughter thinks you are wonderful she too is a POS.
Just stating the facts.
Meltdown.If your daughter thinks you are wonderful she too is a POS.
:rofl:The difference between you and I is I admit when I am wrong
No, seriously...
:die:
I guess that's why you're nener haunted by your words...
the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
How many families?
How many designs?
22 Apr 2025 7:21 pm
Obviously this is not an act of Reflection.DeezerShoove » 22 Apr 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Is it possible to expect people to show the weakness of being wrong? Or changing their view?
We have posters here that, from what I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.
Since you're never wrong.
So at whom is this directed?
23 Apr 2025 5:35 am
DeezerShoove » 22 Apr 2025, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ It is rare because I don't stick my neck out or shove my nose into things of which I am unfamiliar. You are a perfect example of posters that could never admit to a change of heart as alluded to directly in the OP.
A perfect example is your unwavering support of an incompetent and fully incapable president even as his decline became more and more evident. You are sort of a Joe Scarborough here. Many posts, very frequently wrong-headed, unable to admit to anything... A true Chatroom Champ.
Also, your post is a great example of your predictable "accuse others of that which you are guilty".
Thank you for participating.
Familiarity breeds Infallibility, Coozie?It is rare because I don't stick my neck out or shove my nose into things of which I am unfamiliar.
23 Apr 2025 5:37 am
don't be coy...DeezerShoove » 22 Apr 2025, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I had a different view of the version of the holocaust and the world's relationship with Jewish people.
Over time, and due to some thoughtful commentary here in NHB, I researched a bit more.
My view has changed to a slightly less brainwashed outlook on the topic.
I believe it to be much more truthful and more logical now.
IOW I was wrong and feel I had some facts and sources revealed because I paid attention here.
There are some folks that make more sense than others.
has ghetto converted you to a Holocaust Qualifier?
23 Apr 2025 6:52 am
CoozieCosmology, too tedious....lost interest...DeezerShoove » 23 Apr 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ An example of something being "right".
Scientists basically agree on a couple of universal truths.
1) Big Bang Theory - 13 billion years ago the universe was a speck of unimaginable energy. Hence, the origin of The Bang.
2) Observable Universe - We can only "see" as far 13 billion light years because light further out than that hasn't had time enough to reach us yet. As such we don't know how much further any limit to the universe actually is.
So, the Big Bang, 13 billion years ago, is predicated on running the "movie" of the universe in reverse and projecting its age.
How do we know this would ever end if we don't know the actual limit?
The "movie" running in reverse may never stop if there isn't any limit to the universe. We haven't seen that limit.
The best we can say is the universe is at least 13 billion years old. It may have no age at all.
What is right when you only "know" just so much...?
--
Admitting you may have learned something because a post got you thinking is not a sign of weakness.
I PG'd a couple of your posts because you can't seem to grasp the slightest hint of that notion.
I PG'd a couple of your posts because you can't seem
That's not why, Coozie...
23 Apr 2025 6:59 am
All these facts are assumptions life isn't a series parallel situation. Series parallel situation is each object is spontaneously separated in combinations of movements being the whole universe evolving equally forward now as simultaneously a different total sum present all the time each part exists so far.Deezer Shoove » 23 Apr 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ An example of something being "right".
Scientists basically agree on a couple of universal truths.
1) Big Bang Theory - 13 billion years ago the universe was a speck of unimaginable energy. Hence, the origin of The Bang.
2) Observable Universe - We can only "see" as far 13 billion light years because light further out than that hasn't had time enough to reach us yet. As such we don't know how much further any limit to the universe actually is.
So, the Big Bang, 13 billion years ago, is predicated on running the "movie" of the universe in reverse and projecting its age.
How do we know this would ever end if we don't know the actual limit?
The "movie" running in reverse may never stop if there isn't any limit to the universe. We haven't seen that limit.
The best we can say is the universe is at least 13 billion years old. It may have no age at all.
What is right when you only "know" just so much...?
--
Admitting you may have learned something because a post got you thinking is not a sign of weakness.
I PG'd a couple of your posts because you can't seem to grasp the slightest hint of that notion.
Eternity is a balance point of eternal changes combined as currently changing forward so far. Evolution theory is projecting it doesn't happen this way same as wishing a superior entity was in control of outcomes next including all details currently changing form since arrival as a combination added to this point of interpretation forward between existing results spaced apart one ta time now.
Defending reasonable doubt protects doubt life is self evident time adapting uniquely here creating ways to pretend to be exceptional or exempt from standard time adapting in plain sight as specifically one of a kind equally eternally separated now.
Oh what webs are woven in the networks of communicating ideas life exceeds personal time here in one time event of chromosomes being a faraday cage of self evident position of ancestral displacement now.
Better to seek forgiveness from like minded people than stand alone asking permission after admitting you were wrong and still continue to repeat the human error historically performed by every reality serving humanity's promise of 7 tomorrows 52 weeks a year 24 hours a rotation each ancestor is only counted alive cradle to grave.
23 Apr 2025 12:26 pm
31stArrival » 23 Apr 2025, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ When you admit you are wrong, you have to define what made you wrong in the first place. Reality's time management of social outcomes daily or real time daily living just adapting since conceived in series parallel positions of ancestry limited to adapting to life dawn to dusk every rotation alive since personally added to life by genetic outcomes so far.
Einstein's relative time theory distorts actual time adapting as displaced since conception. It manages time by clocks using international dateline and Greenwich prime meridian as division between two east and west halves of each rotation forward other two halves are day facing the core of the solar system and night gazing at the universe beyond this atmosphere by each ancestor alive now.
Oh then there are the two halves each side of the equator. wow 6 halves of a whole physical object universally balancing one of a kind locations by periodic element combinations same way chromosomes are never same total sum per reproduction living each rotation staying the same form as their original fertilized cell until a decomposed corpse personal cycle in the circle of life philosophy living could exceed adapting forward today.
MY anger issues are focused on how corruption doesn't get corrected by rule of law in any alternate reality dividing 5 ancestral lineages each of their 5 generation gaps living daily here without harming the corrupted since birth by their own societal promises of artificial tomorrows every day, dawn to dusk rule of law only acknowledged midnight to noon 7 days a week ideas living is more than personally adapting here now.
I civilly defend my time being me by chromosomes not language arts..
You are a **** spewing lying babbling piece of worthless dog **** that needs to be scraped off a *** shoe! Like harry said, "Be careful where the dog **** you!"
23 Apr 2025 3:14 pm
Corrected a word in your with a hyphen in the quote above. con-spiritual beliefs intellect came before instincts navigate space when sharing time alive now.jefftec » 23 Apr 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ *1. ….probably not wise to do so on this website…..there are narcissists here.
On the other hand, nothing wrong with changing one’s point of view, if it fits their con-science.
It isn't personal jefftec. it is how vocabulary is used socially between generation gaps repeating history daily expecting better tomorrows by defying how evolving works genetically eternally separating ancestors daily here.
23 Apr 2025 6:05 pm
“con-spiritual…con-scious”…..no one can say that you aren’t creative…31stArrival » 23 Apr 2025, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Corrected a word in your with a hyphen in the quote above. con-spiritual beliefs intellect came before instincts navigate space when sharing time alive now.
It isn't personal jefftec. it is how vocabulary is used socially between generation gaps repeating history daily expecting better tomorrows by defying how evolving works genetically eternally separating ancestors daily here.
hmm, comm-scious….no, not going down avenue. Oh well.
23 Apr 2025 8:29 pm
23 Apr 2025 8:35 pm
Remember when you claimed that using PG on a tribute thread was so ****** that not even you would do it?*Huey » 22 Apr 2025, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ The difference between you and I is I admit when I am wrong. In the very instance you do admit you are wrong it is not because you are rarely wrong. It took you MONTHS, literally months, to adit PK was a mistake. You ran and ran from that one. You still have not admitted Biden was wrong, was lying, make the 5x comment. And you still have not admitted it was not a gun in pieces.
That is just to name a few. You blame others, you lie, and basically are a dishonest POS. If your daughter thinks you are wonderful she too is a POS.
Just stating the facts.
24 Apr 2025 5:48 am
I navigate space by heartbeats as individually here everyone else alive is living in series parallel proportionately alive in plain sight meaning the moment regardless which 24 hour space one is located geographically here is living eternally separated in plain sight since arriving a fertilized cell.jefftec » 23 Apr 2025, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ “con-spiritual…con-scious”…..no one can say that you aren’t creative…
hmm, comm-scious….no, not going down avenue. Oh well.
that is how I came up with my screen name 31st Arrival in my ancestral lineage and I evolved long enough to be 1 of 4 grandparents to 2 grandchildren.
My siblings reached 1 of 16 great great grandparents with great great grandchildren older than my 2 grandchildren.
that didn't happen by relative time facts, that happens because life is living eternally separated by the moment here.
Living taught me humanity's concept of space time continuum is artificial facts sustaining reasonable doubt every ancestor alive. Premeditated tomorrows my rule of law tyranny regardless dictatorships or democracies honoring God and country over understanding the natural method of eternal life daily here.
the original sin is practicing self deception cradle to grave.
"Lead us not into temptation and deliver us from evil, live." and currently governing tomorrows midnight to noon 7 days a week dusk to dawn every 2 days in a week 52 weeks year regardless the year has 365 or 366 rotations per revolution of the planet around the star..
Damn I am in trouble now posting in peanut gallery. My temper does that to me.
24 Apr 2025 6:43 am
Interpretation by humans to feel superior to other life forms equally eternally separated now. Oops I did it again, debunked humanity not ancestors living in plain sight.Deezer Shoove » 24 Apr 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ Following your logic from my question to your answer:
Hair is on humans; fur is on non-human mammals.
Rational minds don't accept exponential whole results being one themselves with a sole brain developing the nucleus of their fertilized cell into the organ of the central nervous system to adapt as eternally separated chromosome ancestor per heartbeat daily here in their specific time of ancestral lineage and generation gap part of the food chain exclusively to this universal position's each rotation, each revolution uniquely one of a kind equally alive so far.
I simply applied rule of 72 in economic theory to chromosomes and followed the patterns of behavior between my siblings, my cousins, my previous generation gaps, every other ancestral lineage in reverse time arrived.
Relative time theory factually erases yesterdays contextually, daily, midnight to noon, and noon to midnight, dawn to dusk, 24/7, in rule of law, institutions constituting human rights to die in character or face eternal hell defying humanity in a court of law.
24 Apr 2025 7:37 am
Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember when you claimed that using PG on a tribute thread was so ****** that not even you would do it?
And do you remember after you posted the ONE instance from 4 yours ago what I said? Too Far, although I will admit when I am wrong, assholes like you are why many won’t. This is another reason your wife fled the country.
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
24 Apr 2025 7:39 am
That's a lot of omission.*Huey » 24 Apr 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ And do you remember after you posted the ONE instance from 4 yours ago what I said? Too Far, although I will admit when I am wrong, assholes like you are why many won’t. This is another reason your wife fled the country.
You took many stands before acceding to the Obvious.
24 Apr 2025 7:46 am
Blackvegetable » 24 Apr 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ That's a lot of omission.
You took many stands before acceding to the Obvious.
No asshole, it’s not. The argument was not over whether or not I posted it. You acted like a child (as you usually do) and claimed my mistake was a lie. You went on and on about it.
****, ******, you were proven wrong on. A number of things, like over the name stroky, and never, not ont Once, admitted you were wrong. Using your rules, you lied. Another reason your wife fled as far south as she could, Cuck.
Does your daughter know you were a cuck? And no ArmsLength, you won’t do ****. Nod.
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
24 Apr 2025 7:49 am
*Huey » 24 Apr 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ No asshole, it’s not. The argument was not over whether or not I posted it. You acted like a child (as you usually do) and claimed my mistake was a lie. You went on and on about it.
****, ******, you were proven wrong on. A number of things, like over the name stroky, and never, not ont Once, admitted you were wrong. Using your rules, you lied. Another reason your wife fled as far south as she could, Cuck.
Does your daughter know you were a cuck? And no ArmsLength, you won’t do ****. Nod.
Other than by confronting you with your words, how can we be certain that you are lying?No asshole, it’s not
The meltyness...Does your daughter know you were a cuck?
24 Apr 2025 7:59 am
Not at all. Again, there is no context, real, online, or imagined, where you can put me in meltdown mode. Me, on the other hand, can quickly do that to you. But, you may finally be learning to handle What you started in Aug of 2017.Blackvegetable » 24 Apr 2025, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Other than by confronting you with your words, how can we be certain that you are lying?
The meltyness...
Now, don’t lie about it, Big Nose.
You worked on those chicken legs and have you gotten those hair plugs? The young women you perv over want nothing to do with that hairline.
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Who is online
In total there are 2859 users online :: 6 registered, 14 bots, and 2839 guests
Bots: CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, BLEXBot, semantic-visions.com, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, bingbot, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, app.hypefactors.com, curl/7, GPTBot