Does it really help for Trump to get combative during these interviews. If the interviewer is asking bad questions - this does happen, I'd rather see Trump give a thoughtful, well informed responses where he rejects the interviewer's premises and then proceed to explain why its a false narrative with facts. This is stronger than what he actually did.MR-7 » 30 Apr 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ TRUMP is the best and he proved it...
Donald Trump bluntly tells Terry Moran ‘I don’t trust you’ as the two spar over first 100 days
Yes be combative challenge themSkans » 30 Apr 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Does it really help for Trump to get combative during these interviews. If the interviewer is asking bad questions - this does happen, I'd rather see Trump give a thoughtful, well informed responses where he rejects the interviewer's premises and then proceed to explain why its a false narrative with facts. This is stronger than what he actually did.
If Trump caught the interviewer making false narratives 3 times, at that point, he set up the interviewer for the type of tong lashing Trump gave him. But, without the set-up, it the tong lashing falls flat. It will be used against him. A good comedian has to prime the audience and then spring a fantastic punch line on them. It's the same thing with interviews where the interviewer is being a bit aggressive and using false narratives.
I thought TRUMP was very fair up to the point Moron says the photo has been photo shopped. He's calling TRUMP a liar. I mean, at least Moron could have provided the evidence he has that the photo was altered. And, ABC has always treated TRUMP with total disrespect. **** all the fake news sites. May TRUMP bust them in their *** asses every day.Skans » 30 Apr 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Does it really help for Trump to get combative during these interviews. If the interviewer is asking bad questions - this does happen, I'd rather see Trump give a thoughtful, well informed responses where he rejects the interviewer's premises and then proceed to explain why its a false narrative with facts. This is stronger than what he actually did.
If Trump caught the interviewer making false narratives 3 times, at that point, he set up the interviewer for the type of tong lashing Trump gave him. But, without the set-up, it the tong lashing falls flat. It will be used against him. A good comedian has to prime the audience and then spring a fantastic punch line on them. It's the same thing with interviews where the interviewer is being a bit aggressive and using false narratives.
Who is that cretin calling "grossly incompetent"?MR-7 » 30 Apr 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ "We had a president that was grossly incompetent," Trump said. "You knew it. I knew it. Everybody knew it. You guys didn’t want to write about it because you’re fake news."
"By the way, ABC is one of the worst, I have to be honest with you," he added.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What would you accept as evidence that Grifty lied?MR-7 » 30 Apr 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ I thought TRUMP was very fair up to the point Moron says the photo has been photo shopped. He's calling TRUMP a liar. I mean, at least Moron could have provided the evidence he has that the photo was altered. And, ABC has always treated TRUMP with total disrespect. **** all the fake news sites. May TRUMP bust them in their *** asses every day.
Ok, that's a fair point. I had to go back and re-watch the clip. I didn't catch the part where the reporter claimed the picture was photo-shopped. Yep, he said it, and that is when Trump got combative with him. In reviewing it again, I agree with you, Terry deserved to get punched right between the eyes. You don't make a claim that a photo of a gang member with MS13 tattooed on his knuckles is photo-shopped, unless you are ready to back that BS claim up. The interviewer just made that **** up and lied.MR-7 » 30 Apr 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ I thought TRUMP was very fair up to the point Moron says the photo has been photo shopped. He's calling TRUMP a liar. I mean, at least Moron could have provided the evidence he has that the photo was altered. And, ABC has always treated TRUMP with total disrespect. **** all the fake news sites. May TRUMP bust them in their *** asses every day.
The Dairy Queen Dickhead has an awful case ofBlackvegetable » 30 Apr 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ What would you accept as evidence that Grifty lied?
Lied about what? The THUG being a MS13 gang banger?Blackvegetable » 30 Apr 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ What would you accept as evidence that Grifty lied?
Much respect Skans.Skans » 30 Apr 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, that's a fair point. I had to go back and re-watch the clip. I didn't catch the part where the reporter claimed the picture was photo-shopped. Yep, he said it, and that is when Trump got combative with him. In reviewing it again, I agree with you, Terry deserved to get punched right between the eyes. You don't make a claim that a photo of a gang member with MS13 tattooed on his knuckles is photo-shopped, unless you are ready to back that BS claim up. The interviewer just made that **** up and lied.
There's that.
Let me say this...Skans » 30 Apr 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Does it really help for Trump to get combative during these interviews. If the interviewer is asking bad questions - this does happen, I'd rather see Trump give a thoughtful, well informed responses where he rejects the interviewer's premises and then proceed to explain why its a false narrative with facts. This is stronger than what he actually did.
If Trump caught the interviewer making false narratives 3 times, at that point, he set up the interviewer for the type of tong lashing Trump gave him. But, without the set-up, it the tong lashing falls flat. It will be used against him. A good comedian has to prime the audience and then spring a fantastic punch line on them. It's the same thing with interviews where the interviewer is being a bit aggressive and using false narratives.
Point?Blackvegetable » 30 Apr 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Who is that cretin calling "grossly incompetent"?
The U.S. economy shrank in the first three months of 2025, contracting by an annualized rate of 0.3 percent, a stark reversal after nearly three years of solid growth, as tariff-related uncertainty upended spending patterns and raised fears of an impending recession.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... y-tariffs/
What you are describing is precisely what Putin does - off the cuff, regularly.Skans » 30 Apr 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Does it really help for Trump to get combative during these interviews. If the interviewer is asking bad questions - this does happen, I'd rather see Trump give a thoughtful, well informed responses where he rejects the interviewer's premises and then proceed to explain why its a false narrative with facts. This is stronger than what he actually did.
I think a better response Trump could have made would be to tell the reporter that he would trust his agents in the field to identify gang members, rather than agents of the MSM.Skans » 30 Apr 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ If Trump caught the interviewer making false narratives 3 times, at that point, he set up the interviewer for the type of tong lashing Trump gave him. But, without the set-up, it the tong lashing falls flat. It will be used against him. A good comedian has to prime the audience and then spring a fantastic punch line on them. It's the same thing with interviews where the interviewer is being a bit aggressive and using false narratives.
So whose scrotum tastes better?Cannonpointer » 01 May 2025, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ What you are describing is precisely what Putin does - off the cuff, regularly.
He fields questions routinely - and I'm not talking about from friendly media. I'm talking about from western media - the unfriendliest kind. He has absolute command of the facts, never falls into gotchas, always comes off classy and a winner. He doesn't make fools of reporters. He lets them do that to themselves.
The only point he has is on the top of his head. .3% is well within the margins of error when measuring something the size and complexity of the U.S. economy. .3% is not a contraction. It's a rounding error.
I don't feel any compulsion to go for scrotums, simply because I respect a man. But I understand that IS a thing in your community.JohnnyYou » 01 May 2025, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ So whose scrotum tastes better?
Sounds like you'll choose Putins everyday of the week