Yeah, when you're acting out the way Trump is, you own the results - even in the first quarter. I know that I, personally, have made purchases in advance that I would not have made ordinarily. I made these purchases specifically to avoid the tariffs. I have no illusions that I am the smartest mother **** in Murka and the ONLY SUMBITCH that thought of doing that. So... yeah. Trump owns the surge in imports. The rest of the argument is a wee hazier for me.Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ U.S. economy shrank in early 2025 as tariffs sapped growth and imports surged
GDP contracted at an annual rate of 0.3 percent, a new report shows, as panic purchases ahead of tariffs fueled imports.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... y-tariffs/
Those familiar with The Master's timeless treatise "Econometrics - A Robust Heuristic for Analysing Performance of Presidential Administrations" will argue that an incoming administration can't be held responsible for GDP in the first quarter of their term.
Given the legislative process, it is nearly impossible to both pass, and see the effects of, major policy initiatives less than 3 months after inauguration.
Unless you're Bubble Boy - Unchained.
What I'm saying is that Grifty is an unusually **** POTUS.Cannonpointer » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yeah, when you're acting out the way Trump is, you own the results - even in the first quarter. I know that I, personally, have made purchases in advance that I would not have made ordinarily. I made these purchases specifically to avoid the tariffs. I have no illusions that I am the smartest mother **** in Murka and the ONLY SUMBITCH that thought of doing that. So... yeah. Trump owns the surge in imports. The rest of the argument is a wee hazier for me.
I do not see the relationship between "panic purchases" (FTR, I was quite calm; I was scheming, not panicking) and GDP contraction. How does that bit work? Also, a "contraction" of three tenths of one hundredth? That is only a "contraction" in jackoff land. Three tenths of one percent is a rounding error. It's three one thousandths, to be mathematorically precise. On what planet would a "contraction" that small, in a measured object that big, be outside the margin of error?
What you are really saying is that the economy was flat for Trumps first hundred days. To which I reply, okay. Thanks for the info.
Bloom's Taxonomy Evaluation of Grifticles’ OPBlackvegetable » Today, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. economy shrank in early 2025 as tariffs sapped growth and imports surged
GDP contracted at an annual rate of 0.3 percent, a new report shows, as panic purchases ahead of tariffs fueled imports.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... y-tariffs/
Those familiar with The Master's timeless treatise "Econometrics - A Robust Heuristic for Analysing Performance of Presidential Administrations" will argue that an incoming administration can't be held responsible for GDP in the first quarter of their term.
Given the legislative process, it is nearly impossible to both pass, and see the effects of, major policy initiatives less than 3 months after inauguration.
Unless you're Bubble Boy - Unchained.
No links. No “ask me why.”If tariffs caused a Q1 GDP dip due to import surges and panic buying, what specific sectors were most affected, and how would you distinguish short-term volatility from structural economic weakness?
Why does a dumb piece of ****, incapable of defining "net", presume?Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Bloom's Taxonomy Evaluation of Grifticles’ OP
Title: "GDP dipped and Bubble Boy did it" Whoops...do I need to "Post the title"?
Level 1: Remembering - Check
Check - “GDP contracted at an annual rate of 0.3%”
This is a simple recitation of a fact pulled from the article. There's no interpretation, no connection drawn—just a report summary.
Level 2: Understanding - Nope
The post dances near this level with the line about “panic purchases” and legislative lag, but it falls short. Your ******* doesn't explain why tariffs impacted GDP beyond quoting the source, nor does your ******* demonstrate comprehension beyond surface-level commentary. Wow. Shocker.
It's just simply unnecessary to evaluate for level 3+.
Assessment:
This post peaked at Level 1.0 — it flirts with understanding but never quite crosses the threshold. It's mostly copy/paste with a little glitter glued on.
Alright Grifticles, here’s your Level 2 Challenge:
No links. No “ask me why.”
Just you, a keyboard, and a thought. We'll wait.
(We won’t.)
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why does a dumb piece of ****, incapable of defining "net", presume?
Your job.Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ And there is his dodge. He still can't define survivorship bias or "net", so what can I expect?
Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump says he'll blame Biden again for 2nd quarter GDP after blaming him for Q1 drop
and an even worse human being.
Vegas » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And there is his dodge. He still can't define survivorship bias or "net", so what can I expect?
He was VP for #8, is tied for 13th.BuckNaked » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ plugs n jugs was a disaster. What accomplishments did plugs accomplish in his 50 year political career?
@Blackvegetable Your Op, your job to answer and defend it. You are now at 134 dodges.Vegas » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑If tariffs caused a Q1 GDP dip due to import surges and panic buying, what specific sectors were most affected, and how would you distinguish short-term volatility from structural economic weakness?
Your OPs, **** idiot.Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your OP, Your job. How many times....
SQUARESPACE | Q3 | Service-Seller | :15 | EN-US
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He was VP for #8, is tied for 13th.
My turn...
Post the salient measures by which you believe Grifty will outperform Bad Brandon - The Baby Crusher.
SALIENT, Usefool.
Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He was VP for #8, is tied for 13th.
My turn...
Post the salient measures by which you believe Grifty will outperform Bad Brandon - The Baby Crusher.
which of you is the sok?BuckNaked » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ 1) Undertaken one of most BOLD economic initiatives in American HISTORY...
2) To correct 70 years of a SERIOUSLY SKEWED trade imbalance,
3) To put in place the largest tariff generated increase in America's income since 1913,
4) To CUT and SAVE... WASTE, FRAUD, and Abuse thru-out the U.S. Government,
5) To CLOSE the OUT OF CONTROL Southern Border, and CONTROL: a) the illegal immigration, b) the related Crime & Drug Traffic, & c) the hundreds of thousands of Fentanyl deaths in America yearly...
6) To put America into a position to begin to CLOSE the $37 Trillion deficit, and
7) To do it all by NOT ONLY NOT increasing Income Taxes... but REDUCING them !!!