ConservativeWave » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
California Democrats legalize solicitation of minors, by adults... USING the reasoning that it was because 18 &19 year olds should not be penalized ? BUT, in WHAT WORLD do California Democrats live, where 18 & 19 year old are gong to PAY 16 & 17 year olds for SEX????
MUCH more likely, this law will also ABSOLVE 30, 40, & 50+ year olds, who can AFFORD to solicit teens for sex... AND what's much MORE likely... will ABSOLVE SEX Traffickers when THEY are the middle man in SEX trafficking & deals, and ABUSING 16 &17 years old KIDS in the process !!
IS THIS why the Democrat Party is ALL IN for helping MS-13 and other GANGS... who are KNOWN to do this EXACT THING? ...and, it's not a big LEAP form there, to surmise that California Democrats are being PAID in order to pass these WRONG HEADED laws... in ONE WAY or another, SOMETHING is WRONG here !!!
Democrats are SCUMBAGS... PLAIN & SIMPLE !
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-wor ... der-teens/
That didn't happen, you know.
What they DID do was to block raising it to a felony. They didn't legalize it. They just refused to truly criminalize it.
No bill passed. A bill TRYING to get harsher penalties FAILED to pass.
Accuracy: It's what's for winners.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?