And yet it’s 5 billion they don’t need to steal from the American tax payer. If your numbers are even accurate.Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And all these idiots need to be told is to meet ANY criticism of this complete and utter scam with whimpers of
"Why do you oppose eliminating gubmint waist?"
HA!! Sounds like Liberal BULL $HIT to me..Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And all these idiots need to be told is to meet ANY criticism of this complete and utter scam with whimpers of
"Why do you oppose eliminating gubmint waist?"
So **** g'ddammned stupidCedar » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And yet it’s 5 billion they don’t need to steal from the American tax payer. If your numbers are even accurate.
Another stupendous misrepresentation of evolving life in real time.Blackvegetable » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And all these idiots need to be told is to meet ANY criticism of this complete and utter scam with whimpers of
"Why do you oppose eliminating gubmint waist?"
So the repukes lied. Fascinating. You could bowl me over with a feather.Blackvegetable » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And all these idiots need to be told is to meet ANY criticism of this complete and utter scam with whimpers of
"Why do you oppose eliminating gubmint waist?"
Still no intelligent thoughts about your own OP.Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And all these idiots need to be told is to meet ANY criticism of this complete and utter scam with whimpers of
"Why do you oppose eliminating gubmint waist?"
Or that barnyard animals aren't to my personal tastes....Cannonpointer » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So the repukes lied. Fascinating. You could bowl me over with a feather.
Meanwhile, several repukes - not the majority, I admit, but several - know the difference between a boar and a sow. That means if they're stupid, you're a moron.
By all means stay vegan, eggplant
Tastes suggests discrimination, fruitcake. You cannot discriminate between a male human and a female human.
Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Tastes suggests discrimination, fruitcake. You cannot discriminate between a male human and a female human.
Don't start trying to pretend you have a palate, fruitcake.
You cannot even DEFINE woman, much less distinguish one from a man.
Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why don't you and @Deezer Shoove just let me spam this piece of ****? All he does is demand answers to his incessant questions while evading and dodging everybody else. He should be punished until he can finally get the ball sack to start defending his own OPs.
How about we compromise-you allow me to spam his threads until he answers questions after the being asked the first time, and in return I will...crap. I got nothing. Be that as it may, I will do what you ask...within reason.
@Blackvegetable
I'll make it work.
My instincts have NEVER failed me....over a large sample size...Cannonpointer » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Tastes suggests discrimination, fruitcake. You cannot discriminate between a male human and a female human.
Don't start trying to pretend you have a palate, fruitcake.
You cannot even DEFINE woman, much less distinguish one from a man.
How will that be different than what you do now?Vegas » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why don't you and @Deezer Shoove just let me spam this piece of ****? All he does is demand answers to his incessant questions while evading and dodging everybody else. He should be punished until he can finally get the ball sack to start defending his own OPs.
How about we compromise-you allow me to spam his threads until he answers questions after the being asked the first time, and in return I will...crap. I got nothing. Be that as it may, I will do what you ask...within reason.
@Blackvegetable