And sure as **** not Pimp.
Post my definition of Survivorship bias.Vegas » 22 May 2025, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Your quote of mine does nothing to prove a contradiction. You do what you always do. Stalk. You found an old thread about it and then pretend it's a mic drop on your behalf. You literally proved nothing.
Let's get back to it. Give the full definition. NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!
1. You will stalk again and post a quote/thread that does nothing to gain favor for your side...but you will pretend it does. **** moron.
Based on that paltry remuneration, she was likely an assistant to Hunter Biden's assistant's assistant.Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑ @Harper Lee
Can you tell everyone what Pam Bondi did that was worth 115,000/mo.?
Burisma paid Hunter less than half as much.Cannonpointer » 22 May 2025, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Based on that paltry remuneration, she was likely an assistant to Hunter Biden's assistant's assistant.
Why do you ax?
The claim was made by sen. markwayne mullin - the only native american (featherhead not dot head) indian senator.
You really need that explained?
You have a right to be Stupid.Cannonpointer » 22 May 2025, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You really need that explained?
The lie is that the gift is to trump, for personal use, when it is to the United States, for use by its air force to haul the president around.
So do machine gun advocates, stupid.
Where does the Constitution mention "machine guns"?
Hasty google: CelebrityNetWorth.com reports Hunter Biden's net worth at $1 million, although he earned as much as $6 million between 2014 and 2016.Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Burisma paid Hunter less than half as much.
Hunter was never appointed to Joe's cabinet.
They are technically correct.
Right after it says, "No free jets."Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Where does the Constitution mention "machine guns"?
https://youtu.be/0eXIOK2vOhM?si=KH3Y6TxzY9GeFhRgBlackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ Is it legal for a foreign country to gift a $400 million plane to the President of the United States for his personal use? Not according to the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
The prohibition against foreign gifts to the President or other office holder, absent Congressional approval, is "the only ethics and conflicts rule that was put directly in the Constitution by the founders and the framers."
And yet, according to reports, Attorney General Pam Bondi (R) has concluded that the transfer of the plane from Qatar to the Defense Department and then to the Trump Presidential Library is legally permissible.
How did Bondi come to this conclusion? Her rationale has not been publicly released. But we do know that, before joining Trump's political operation, Bondi represented the Qatari Government as a foreign agent in a $115,000 per month contract between Qatar and Bondi's former employer, the Trump-connected lobbying firm Ballard Partners.
If Qatar transfers the plane to Trump, the complex process of outfitting the plane with the security features to serve as Air Force One will reportedly go to L3Harris, a military contractor. L3Harris recently hired Ballard Partners to lobby the federal government on its behalf for "business development."
https://open.substack.com/pub/popularinformation/p/why-qatar-is-bribing-trump?r=7dnqz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
When Comer starts looking into THIS ****....
Emoluments Clause.
Someone should remove you.Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ I post an example of you doing the same, you pluck out your eyes so I may **** into your empty sockets.
Deal?
No mention of jets, turd. Not one word about jets - and there were airports, so they knew.
Why does someone else have to post your definition?
Because he insisted.31stArrival » 23 May 2025, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ Why does someone else have to post your definition?
Just say it yourself. I do. Called adapting in space mutually evolving one of a kind now, as equally occupying time same as your denying *** has since you convinced yourself reality is more than actual time adapting here since your body arrived as a fertilized cell never same shape since.
same chromosomes though.
Look at you still not sharing your definitions? Just evading what you been since a fertilize cell equally inhabiting space now pretending to be beyond actual self.