Just misinterpretations by all sides playing "we are better than everyone else.".
When was the Reagan plane donated to his library?*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Just like with reagan the US Government will donate it to his library. Not fly around on as I said earlier.
Acknowledge you were answered correctly.
I am done with your 20 questions. Start making points. You are afraid to go on record, Coward.
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ Either tell me what happens when Grifty is done with it, or stop puking up your spin, Toady.
The Presidential Library system is composed of sixteen Presidential Libraries across 14 facilities nationwide. These facilities are overseen by the Office of Presidential Libraries, in the National Archives and Records Administration. The Hoover through the George W. Bush Libraries also have museums with permanent and temporary exhibitions, educational offerings, and public programming. View locations and contact information. The Frequently Asked Questions page contains additional information about the National Archives Presidential Libraries and Museums.The Presidential Library SystemPresidential Libraries are archives and museums, bringing together the documents and artifacts of a President and his administration and presenting them to the public for study and discussion without regard for political considerations or affiliations. Presidential Libraries and Museums, like their holdings, belong to the American people.Many Presidential papers and records had been lost, destroyed, sold for profit, or ruined by poor storage conditions. In 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt sought a better alternative. Learn more about the Presidential Libraries HistoryCongress legislated this policy, passing the Presidential Libraries Act in 1955. Through archives, museums, and public programs, Presidential Libraries continue to preserve the documents and artifacts of our Presidents, helping us learn about our nation and our democracy.
Notice how you're a lying traitor *** **** stain child molester.
When was Reagan's 2nd term over?*Beekeeper » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ 2001, SUCKFACE!!
Reagan Plane Given to Library - Los Angeles Times
Aug. 17, 2001 12 AM PTTIMES STAFF WRITERA Boeing 707 jet used as Air Force One by five former presidents will be retired and donated to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library next month.Library directors have committed to carefully preserve this significant piece of American history, said Secretary of the Air Force James G. Roche. The library’s location 50 miles north of Los Angeles, allowing easy access for millions of people, also influenced the military’s decision, Roche said.The library’s fund-raising arm has promised to pay for getting the aircraft to its new home in a hangar to be built next to the library, set on 100 hilltop acres above Simi Valley.
How's that for a CITATION that KICKS YOUR **** MORONIC IMBECILIC ***??
**** OFF, ASSHOLE, YOU'VE LOST!!
Eeeewwwww! The creep is still thinking about me.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ When was Reagan's 2nd term over?
Even @*HooooeyVagina had the sense to back off.
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ They cite the Constitution in support...
What have you got?
Other than PTSD.
Is it creepy when you do it, or are you convinced that you don't?*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Eeeewwwww! The creep is still thinking about me.
PS. I didn't back off. You refused to make a point. Like a coward. I made my point and hid behind questions.
:rofl:*Beekeeper » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Psssst. ****!!!
It's NOT A PERSONAL GIFT TO TRUMP SO THE EMMOLUMENTS CLAUSE DOESN'T APPLY HERE!!
Now, GO **** YOURSELF!! It was NEVER a PERSONAL GIFT AND NEVER WILL BE, ASSHOLE!!
Title is a question, hence hiding. As always, no intelligent thoughts of his ownBlackvegetable » Today, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ Is it legal for a foreign country to gift a $400 million plane to the President of the United States for his personal use? Not according to the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
The prohibition against foreign gifts to the President or other office holder, absent Congressional approval, is "the only ethics and conflicts rule that was put directly in the Constitution by the founders and the framers."
And yet, according to reports, Attorney General Pam Bondi (R) has concluded that the transfer of the plane from Qatar to the Defense Department and then to the Trump Presidential Library is legally permissible.
How did Bondi come to this conclusion? Her rationale has not been publicly released. But we do know that, before joining Trump's political operation, Bondi represented the Qatari Government as a foreign agent in a $115,000 per month contract between Qatar and Bondi's former employer, the Trump-connected lobbying firm Ballard Partners.
If Qatar transfers the plane to Trump, the complex process of outfitting the plane with the security features to serve as Air Force One will reportedly go to L3Harris, a military contractor. L3Harris recently hired Ballard Partners to lobby the federal government on its behalf for "business development."
https://open.substack.com/pub/popularinformation/p/why-qatar-is-bribing-trump?r=7dnqz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
When Comer starts looking into THIS ****....
I post an example of you doing the same, you pluck out your eyes so I may **** into your empty sockets.Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Title is a question, hence hiding. As always, no intelligent thoughts of his own
Let's save time-here is my response to your upcoming question: There is no **** rule. I am simply humiliating you. If you don't like being humiliated, then you have 2 options:
1. Do better
2. Come up with your own damn rule about it.
Lmao!Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Is it creepy when you do it, or are you convinced that you don't?
If the latter, please explain why you continue to employ the tag function, while sporting the @*......Vagina tunic...
Only if you can prove that the ratio between us is proportionate. Then it's a deal.Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I post an example of you doing the same, you pluck out your eyes so I may **** into your empty sockets.
Deal?
Blackvegetable » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ When was Reagan's 2nd term over?
Even @*HooooeyVagina had the sense to back off.
*Beekeeper » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It's NOT GOING INTO TRUMP'S LIBRARY UNTIL LONG AFTER HIS TERM IS OVER, ASSHOLE!!
Suck on that one, MORON!!
Beside, It was USED BY REAGAN,, AS PRESIDENT ON US BUSINESS to ride around it, same as TRUMP IS USING IT FOR!!
In regards to your thread title, it's because you're a worthless at arm's length POS living in a duplex who hates very successful women...Blackvegetable » Today, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ Is it legal for a foreign country to gift a $400 million plane to the President of the United States for his personal use? Not according to the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
The prohibition against foreign gifts to the President or other office holder, absent Congressional approval, is "the only ethics and conflicts rule that was put directly in the Constitution by the founders and the framers."
And yet, according to reports, Attorney General Pam Bondi (R) has concluded that the transfer of the plane from Qatar to the Defense Department and then to the Trump Presidential Library is legally permissible.
How did Bondi come to this conclusion? Her rationale has not been publicly released. But we do know that, before joining Trump's political operation, Bondi represented the Qatari Government as a foreign agent in a $115,000 per month contract between Qatar and Bondi's former employer, the Trump-connected lobbying firm Ballard Partners.
If Qatar transfers the plane to Trump, the complex process of outfitting the plane with the security features to serve as Air Force One will reportedly go to L3Harris, a military contractor. L3Harris recently hired Ballard Partners to lobby the federal government on its behalf for "business development."
https://open.substack.com/pub/popularinformation/p/why-qatar-is-bribing-trump?r=7dnqz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
When Comer starts looking into THIS ****....
Kamala Harris.ROG62 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In regards to your thread title, it's because you're a worthless at arm's length POS living in a duplex who hates very successful women...