Liberal Forum

.As for 451,000 new jobs created, the statistic is based on a Fox Business story using company announcements and industry reports. 9NEWS relied on government statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Based on reports from BLS, we reviewed job data from March and April 2025, since Trump has been president, and compared it to March and April 2024. 

In March and April this year, there were 362,000 new jobs. In the same time period last year, there were 475,000.

https://www.9news.com/article/news/poli ... 7ecd1410a2

"Securing American Innumeracy".

So **** g'ddammned stupid...
 

Can I get a

"BUT LESS IS SO MUCH MORE!"

from the congregation?

I knew I could.
 

BV the **** POS liberal shill
 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 7:57 am

.As for 451,000 new jobs created, the statistic is based on a Fox Business story using company announcements and industry reports. 9NEWS relied on government statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Based on reports from BLS, we reviewed job data from March and April 2025, since Trump has been president, and compared it to March and April 2024. 

In March and April this year, there were 362,000 new jobs. In the same time period last year, there were 475,000.

https://www.9news.com/article/news/poli ... 7ecd1410a2

"Securing American Innumeracy".

So **** g'ddammned stupid...

Is that before or after this revision:

Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. employers added far fewer jobs than originally reported in the year through March, the Labor Department said on Wednesday, underscoring the growing concerns the Federal Reserve has about the health of the labor market as it gears up to start cutting interest rates in September.
The department's estimate for total payroll employment for the period from April 2023 to March 2024 was lowered by 818,000. The revision represented a total downward change of about 0.5% and means that monthly job gains during the period averaged roughly 174,000, compared to the previously reported figure of 242,000.


https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-j ... 024-08-21/
 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 7:57 am

.As for 451,000 new jobs created, the statistic is based on a Fox Business story using company announcements and industry reports. 9NEWS relied on government statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Based on reports from BLS, we reviewed job data from March and April 2025, since Trump has been president, and compared it to March and April 2024. 

In March and April this year, there were 362,000 new jobs. In the same time period last year, there were 475,000.

https://www.9news.com/article/news/poli ... 7ecd1410a2

"Securing American Innumeracy".

So **** g'ddammned stupid...
 

Statistically averaging social issues compared to actual separation of chromosomes to ancestral lineages specifically occupying time today inhabiting space one at a time debating anything else is possible tomorrow, 7 days a week, cradle to grave.

*Huey » 21 May 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 8:22 am

Is that before or after this revision:

Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. employers added far fewer jobs than originally reported in the year through March, the Labor Department said on Wednesday, underscoring the growing concerns the Federal Reserve has about the health of the labor market as it gears up to start cutting interest rates in September.
The department's estimate for total payroll employment for the period from April 2023 to March 2024 was lowered by 818,000. The revision represented a total downward change of about 0.5% and means that monthly job gains during the period averaged roughly 174,000, compared to the previously reported figure of 242,000.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-j ... 024-08-21/

May I be relieved of the obligation of harpooning this bloated talking point carcass AGAIN?

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 8:28 am

May I be relieved of the obligation of harpooning this bloated talking point carcass AGAIN?

 

Go ahead and run.  But remember your hypocrisy and cowardice the next time you ask a repetitive question.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 7:57 am

.As for 451,000 new jobs created, the statistic is based on a Fox Business story using company announcements and industry reports. 9NEWS relied on government statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Based on reports from BLS, we reviewed job data from March and April 2025, since Trump has been president, and compared it to March and April 2024. 

In March and April this year, there were 362,000 new jobs. In the same time period last year, there were 475,000.

https://www.9news.com/article/news/poli ... 7ecd1410a2

"Securing American Innumeracy".

So **** g'ddammned stupid...

"It's only math"
OK let's try some 8th grade level   "compound probability" math.
Blacks are only 1/8 the USA population yet they commit 1/2 of all murder year after year after year.
This makes Blacks how many times more likely to commit murder than the rest of the USA population combined...?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 8:28 am

May I be relieved of the obligation of harpooning this bloated talking point carcass AGAIN?

No you may not 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 7:57 am

"Securing American Innumeracy".


 

Coming from the person who still can't define survivorship bias and net. 

The hypocrisy continues.

Vegas » 21 May 2025, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 9:08 am

Coming from the person who still can't define survivorship bias and net. 

The hypocrisy continues.

I show that I have defined Survivorship bias, and you FedEx me your vital organs, in aspic.


Deal?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 9:48 am

I show that I have defined Survivorship bias, and you FedEx me your vital organs, in aspic.

Deal?

If you can prove that you did it in your words, WITHOUT MY HELP, then yes. It's a deal. 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 9:48 am

I show that I have defined Survivorship bias, and you FedEx me your vital organs, in aspic.

Deal?

aspic
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
noun

1. a savory jelly made with meat stock, set in a mold and used to contain pieces of meat, seafood, or eggs.
   "chicken in aspic"

Vegas » 21 May 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 10:03 am

If you can prove that you did it in your words, WITHOUT MY HELP, then yes. It's a deal.

Prove that you helped.

*Huey » 21 May 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 8:32 am

Go ahead and run.  But remember your hypocrisy and cowardice the next time you ask a repetitive question.

You don't answer ANY questions..

What is the date of the revision to which you refer?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 10:35 am

You don't answer ANY questions..

What is the date of the revision to which you refer?

What is the date of the revision to which you refer?

Posted in the link. 

You don't answer ANY questions..

 

*Huey » 21 May 2025, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 10:37 am

Posted in the link.

Didn't answer that question either.

Defaulting into a lot of Ls today.

BV still hasn't defined the term woman

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 10:40 am

Didn't answer that question either.

Defaulting into a lot of Ls today.

 

It is already posted.  THe answer is in the link that is posted it.  You can see it in the quote.  Additionally, if you weren't such a lazy coward, afraid to go on record, you would click the link and then make a point.

But, you are a ****.  

*Huey » 21 May 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2025, 8:22 am

Is that before or after this revision:

Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. employers added far fewer jobs than originally reported in the year through March, the Labor Department said on Wednesday, underscoring the growing concerns the Federal Reserve has about the health of the labor market as it gears up to start cutting interest rates in September.
The department's estimate for total payroll employment for the period from April 2023 to March 2024 was lowered by 818,000. The revision represented a total downward change of about 0.5% and means that monthly job gains during the period averaged roughly 174,000, compared to the previously reported figure of 242,000.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-j ... 024-08-21/