How about this. I'll give you what you would say ready? "prove I didn't. "
The point is posted, in your link.*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is already posted. THe answer is in the link that is posted it. You can see it in the quote. Additionally, if you weren't such a lazy coward, afraid to go on record, you would click the link and then make a point.
But, you are a ****.
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ .As for 451,000 new jobs created, the statistic is based on a Fox Business story using company announcements and industry reports. 9NEWS relied on government statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Based on reports from BLS, we reviewed job data from March and April 2025, since Trump has been president, and compared it to March and April 2024.
In March and April this year, there were 362,000 new jobs. In the same time period last year, there were 475,000.
https://www.9news.com/article/news/poli ... 7ecd1410a2
"Securing American Innumeracy".
So **** g'ddammned stupid...
And the man afraid to make a point, go on record, drones on.
When you don't answer questions, particularly about your own links, you make my point.
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ When you don't answer questions, particularly about your own links, you make my point.
In your words.
Stop running from the challenges....
You sure post a lot for a guy without much substance.
When you do nothing but ask questions, (particularly when the answer was already posted) and refuse to make a point, go on record, it proves you are a coward. I told you the other day that when yh ou find your balls and takes stands, go on record, I then will answer your questions.Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ When you don't answer questions, particularly about your own links, you make my point.
In your words.
I answer questions and take unambiguous stands.*Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ When you do nothing but ask questions, (particularly when the answer was already posted) and refuse to make a point, go on record, it proves you are a coward. I told you the other day that when yh ou find your balls and takes stands, go on record, I then will answer your questions.
You may stipulate what you want but they'll be my conditions, as stated.Vegas » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I said I would take the challenges you illiterate ****. Under my stipulations. Your stipulations are stupid , as always.
You wanna see 'em?
Oh my god! You are **** hilarious! In s hypocritical sorta way.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I answer questions and take unambiguous stands.
You do neither.
Look at what the **** just posted:BlackvegetableVegas » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I said I would take the challenges you illiterate ****. Under my stipulations. Your stipulations are stupid , as always.
I answer questions and take unambiguous stands.*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
19 minutes ago
When you do nothing but ask questions, (particularly when the answer was already posted) and refuse to make a point, go on record, it proves you are a coward. I told you the other day that when yh ou find your balls and takes stands, go on record, I then will answer your questions.
Since they are comparing them with the current bls data, it would make sense.*Huey » Today, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ Is that before or after this revision:
Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. employers added far fewer jobs than originally reported in the year through March, the Labor Department said on Wednesday, underscoring the growing concerns the Federal Reserve has about the health of the labor market as it gears up to start cutting interest rates in September.
The department's estimate for total payroll employment for the period from April 2023 to March 2024 was lowered by 818,000. The revision represented a total downward change of about 0.5% and means that monthly job gains during the period averaged roughly 174,000, compared to the previously reported figure of 242,000.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-j ... 024-08-21/