Liberal Forum

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Look at what the **** just posted:Blackvegetable

I answer questions and take unambiguous stands.

You do neither.

With what do you take issue?

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Oh my god!  You are **** hilarious!  In s hypocritical  sorta way.

Tiny,

Why do you persist?
 

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Look at what the **** just posted:Blackvegetable

I answer questions and take unambiguous stands.

You do neither.

God Grifticles. You check every single box for narcissism. Every day. 

The sad thing is that you literally believe your lies. You genuinely believe this. 

And your predictable as hell. Watch: You will now respond with "Prove it." To which I will reply - 156 dodges. 


Moron. 


@Blackvegetable  

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:28 am

May I be relieved of the obligation of harpooning this bloated talking point carcass AGAIN?

NO!

Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

You wanna see 'em?

No thanx...4 failed years was enough.  

Blackvegetable » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

Since they are comparing them with the current bls data, it would make sense.

But they do make a mistake.

They compare Feb & March 2024 with March & April 2025.

If you correct, either way, for their error Grifty still loses.

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001&output_view=net_1mth

But march of 2024 was revised DOWN.   Is the number you are touting from March and April 2024 BEFORE or AFTER the revision.  If you would get to the point right away we could have resolved this much sooner.  BUT, you have to go thru **** theatrics. 

Vegas » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

God Grifticles. You check every single box for narcissism. Every day. 

The sad thing is that you literally believe your lies. You genuinely believe this. 

And your predictable as hell. Watch: You will now respond with "Prove it." To which I will reply - 156 dodges. 


Moron. 


@Blackvegetable  

 

 

I gotta a good laugh out of it. 
 

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

But march of 2024 was revised DOWN.   Is the number you are touting from March and April 2024 BEFORE or AFTER the revision.  If you would get to the point right away we could have resolved this much sooner.  BUT, you have to go thru **** theatrics.

yes...in AUGUST, 2024, you **** doorstep!

Once again demonstrating why you must always answer questions the first time.

Nod.

 

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

I gotta a good laugh out of it.

The delusions are real. He genuinely believes it. 

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

yes...in AUGUST, 2024, you **** doorstop!

Once again demonstrating why you must always answer questions the first time.

Nod.

 
 

 

You should have just got to the point right away without the pontificating and theatrics.  Plus, you are not sure what numbers they are using.  

 

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You should have just got to the point right away without the pontificating and theatrics.  Plus, you are not sure what numbers they are using.

Who is stupid enough to believe BLS doesn't update its data according to its own revisions?

Oh....wait...


Let me look at your sig.

This is awkward...

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Who is stupid enough to believe BLS doesn't update its data according to its own revisions?

Oh....wait...


Let me look at your sig.

This is awkward...

 

For you it is awkward.  I got you to show what an egotistical *** your are, again.  

Blackvegetable » 57 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

57 minutes ago

With what do you take issue?

156 dodges and he asks this ^^^. God the delusions. One huge **** piece of ****. 

Just kill yourself already. You offer nothing to society. 

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

For you it is awkward.  I got you to show what an egotistical *** your are, again.

How so?

Because you embarrassed yourself?
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

How so?

Because you embarrassed yourself?

Oh look...hiding twice. Now he will ask about a rule or some stupid ****. 

156 dodges. 

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Oh look...hiding twice. Now he will ask about a rule or some stupid ****. 

156 dodges.

Are you making any progress trying to find evidence that you're not a moron?

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Are you making any progress trying to find evidence that you're not a moron?

Hides again and again and again...

The same **** comments. Unbelievable. This guy just can't come up with anything different. 

Watch this: Hides. Probably something like "is that a yes or no?" or something stupid.

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Hides again and again and again...

The same **** comments. Unbelievable. This guy just can't come up with anything different. 

Watch this: Hides. Probably something like "is that a yes or no?" or something stupid.

I take that as a "No....I can't stand the thought of reading my ****."

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Are you making any progress trying to find evidence that you're not a moron?

It's only math. Staying within genetic outcomes of ancestral lineages occupying time in the atmosphere daily here

Each son or daughter has 2 parents.

Any siblings of a son or daughter share at least one of the 2 parents biologically here.

The two parents from the same process regardless how many siblings in previous generation had two parents that become the grandparents of each last son or daughter added to the species so far. 3 generation gaps living same rotations alive biologically are specifically 6 prior people lived for each grandchild added in direct sequence to numbers living in all 3 generation gaps of one family unit having a population that adds all the combinations together each rotation forward.

Add a 4th generation gap and the biological numbers become 14 previous ancestor sharing DNA with the new arrived each great grandchild. Expand that to 5 generation gaps and chromosome relativity become 30 in each great great grandchild.

No great great grandchild born ever gets conceived again while they may conceptualize themselves as larger than their time living in plain sight.

Oh Look! original sin is self deception practiced ancestrally forward socially in every reality here today.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I take that as a "No....I can't stand the thought of reading my ****."

      Copies me again. No thoughts of his own. Hello Mary. 

156 dodges. ^^^