Does AI say karen read is guilty or innocent?

17 posts • Page 1 of 1
Buck Naked
Today 9:03 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,035 posts
If it’s so smart what does it say about this case 
User avatar
Mrkelly
Today 11:08 am
User avatar
      
9,318 posts
BuckNaked » Today, 9:03 am » wrote: If it’s so smart what does it say about this case
ask it
Image
Buck Naked
Today 11:24 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,042 posts
I don’t use AI
User avatar
Skans
Today 12:08 pm
User avatar
      
14,263 posts
BuckNaked » 43 minutes ago » wrote: I don’t use AI
 Image
You've got mail.
Harper Lee
Today 12:29 pm
      
9,298 posts
BuckNaked » Today, 9:03 am » wrote: If it’s so smart what does it say about this case
She is so guilty 




 
Buck Naked
Today 1:26 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,043 posts

someone ax it please 
Buck Naked
Today 2:53 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,048 posts
 Nuttin happens when I ax is karen read guilty 
 
User avatar
jerra b
Today 3:36 pm
User avatar
      
8,921 posts
BuckNaked » 47 minutes ago » wrote:  Nuttin happens when I ax is karen read guilty
---------------------------------------As of April 30, 2025, Karen Read has not been found guilty of the charges against her. She is currently undergoing a retrial for the alleged murder of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The first trial ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury, which means that the jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict on whether she was guilty or not[1].In her ongoing retrial, which began on April 22, 2025, Read faces charges including second-degree murder and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. Her defense team has argued that jurors in the first trial reached a unanimous but unannounced decision to acquit her on two of the three charges. They claim this constitutes double jeopardy if she is retried on those charges[2][3].The U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to hear an appeal from Read's defense regarding these double jeopardy claims, allowing the retrial to proceed[4]. As of now, testimonies are ongoing, and it remains to be seen how the jury will ultimately decide in this case.Thus, as it stands today, Karen Read is presumed innocent until proven guilty in this retrial process.Authoritative Sources
Buck Naked
Today 4:09 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,049 posts
jerrab » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ---------------------------------------As of April 30, 2025, Karen Read has not been found guilty of the charges against her. She is currently undergoing a retrial for the alleged murder of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The first trial ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury, which means that the jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict on whether she was guilty or not[1].In her ongoing retrial, which began on April 22, 2025, Read faces charges including second-degree murder and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. Her defense team has argued that jurors in the first trial reached a unanimous but unannounced decision to acquit her on two of the three charges. They claim this constitutes double jeopardy if she is retried on those charges[2][3].The U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to hear an appeal from Read's defense regarding these double jeopardy claims, allowing the retrial to proceed[4]. As of now, testimonies are ongoing, and it remains to be seen how the jury will ultimately decide in this case.Thus, as it stands today, Karen Read is presumed innocent until proven guilty in this retrial process.Authoritative Sources
Thanks for the effort but I want to know what AI thinks now will she be found guilty or innocent?
User avatar
jerra b
Today 4:23 pm
User avatar
      
8,922 posts
BuckNaked » Today, 1:26 pm » wrote: someone ax it please
undetermined.
-----------------------Conversely, Read's defense team maintains that O’Keefe was killed by other individuals present at the Canton home, and that law enforcement officers subsequently engaged in a vast conspiracy to cover up the true circumstances of his death and frame Read.[1]While the core allegations remain the same, several significant differences distinguish the retrial from the first proceeding, potentially influencing the jury's decision:
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Today 5:15 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
41,951 posts
BuckNaked » Today, 9:03 am » wrote: If it’s so smart what does it say about this case
I thought you only watched baseball.
User avatar
murdock
Today 5:17 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
1,447 posts
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: I thought you only watched baseball.

Lying traitor *** bastard.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Today 5:23 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
41,953 posts
BuckNaked » Today, 11:24 am » wrote: I don’t use AI
"Tell me what's happening....because I refuse to know!"


You come from a very small holler, don't you....


 
User avatar
murdock
Today 7:08 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
1,451 posts
Blackvegetable » Today, 5:23 pm » wrote: "Tell me what's happening....because I refuse to know!"

You come from a very small holler, don't you....

You come from a *** asshole.
User avatar
Johnny You
Today 7:40 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,812 posts
BuckNaked » Today, 9:03 am » wrote: If it’s so smart what does it say about this case
I saw AI has been reanalyzing 150 TB of radioastronomical data and has identified potential intelligent signals. (In like 30 minutes versus 100,000's of hours of humans listening to static all day long at 90$ an hour)

I am wondering if P Diddiy will be sentenced to 47,450 hours of community service as Head Oil Boy on Trumpocalypse's Flying **** Fortress.

You are probably wondering how good Karen Read's Flyting **** is and if Bruce Springsteen will strap his hands around your engines at the same time.

People say I should try Stand Up.  I am pretty sure anybody born in the audience would stand up and run away.
 
 
Buck Naked
Today 8:55 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,050 posts
Blackvegetable » Today, 5:15 pm » wrote: I thought you only watched baseball.

don’t think…..where did you get that idea?
17 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 421 users online :: 12 registered, 17 bots, and 392 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, oBot, curl/7, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, Adsbot, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, Applebot, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, BLEXBot
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum