Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
BlackVEGGIE: “The Wages of Supply side idiocy Parte QUATRE”
BlackVEGGIE: “The Wages of Supply side idiocy Parte QUATRE”
By LowIQTrash
Today 7:42 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
In an alternate universe…
——————
GOP Senator in a subpoena:
“ChancelloR Musk, if DOGE allegedly cut $1T or more GUBMINT WAIST from the annual federal budget, why does the tRUMP administration intend to increase the NATIONOE DETT by > 3T compared to a baseline budget over the next 10 years?”
——————
https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/i ... ay-19-2025
PWBM now estimates that conventional primary deficits will increase by $3,175 billion ($3.2 trillion) over the 10-year budget window.
——————
GOP Senator in a subpoena:
“ChancelloR Musk, if DOGE allegedly cut $1T or more GUBMINT WAIST from the annual federal budget, why does the tRUMP administration intend to increase the NATIONOE DETT by > 3T compared to a baseline budget over the next 10 years?”
——————
https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/i ... ay-19-2025
PWBM now estimates that conventional primary deficits will increase by $3,175 billion ($3.2 trillion) over the 10-year budget window.
Are you familiar with the 3 trillion budget dodge?LowIQTrash » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In an alternate universe…
——————
GOP Senator in a subpoena:
“ChancelloR Musk, if DOGE allegedly cut $1T or more GUBMINT WAIST from the annual federal budget, why does the tRUMP administration intend to increase the NATIONOE DETT by > 3T compared to a baseline budget over the next 10 years?”
——————
https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/i ... ay-19-2025
PWBM now estimates that conventional primary deficits will increase by $3,175 billion ($3.2 trillion) over the 10-year budget window.
But Jesse will furrow his brow and explain that democrats "spend like drunken sailors", and Gutfeld's face will contort in heart belly laughs as if hearing it for the first time.
Republican populist humor.
You have to LOVE the idiot's attempt to prove something with a TEN-YEAR PROJECTION that has NEVER happened in the ENTIRE history of TEN-YEAR PROJECTIONS
But if it makes your **** MORONS FEEL BETTER ABOUT YOURSELVES, have at it.
Dumbasses.
Now tell us WHY this is ****!!
Go!
But if it makes your **** MORONS FEEL BETTER ABOUT YOURSELVES, have at it.
Dumbasses.
Now tell us WHY this is ****!!
Go!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
WHY? Because due to the Budgetary process:LowIQTrash » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In an alternate universe…
——————
GOP Senator in a subpoena:
“ChancelloR Musk, if DOGE allegedly cut $1T or more GUBMINT WAIST from the annual federal budget, why does the tRUMP administration intend to increase the NATIONOE DETT by > 3T compared to a baseline budget over the next 10 years?”
——————
https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/i ... ay-19-2025
PWBM now estimates that conventional primary deficits will increase by $3,175 billion ($3.2 trillion) over the 10-year budget window.
1) The CBO assumes a yearly 1.5% GDP growth (which with Trumps relocation of $7T of private $$$ into America is likely to be more like 3.5%/yr. growth) !
2) The Budget does not include Tariff income (Likely to be $1T+/yr.) ! and
3) Does NOT include all the ancillary benefits/savings associated with DOGE, controlling the border, and Federal workforce reductions !
SO, a spending increase of $3T over 10 years ( $350B/yr.), minus something close to $4.5 Trillion income/savings per YEAR... is a NET ESTIMATED Savings of over $4 Trillion/yr. !!
NO WONDER Democrats always SCREW UP the Budget...
You watch these people?Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Are you familiar with the 3 trillion budget dodge?
But Jesse will furrow his brow and explain that democrats "spend like drunken sailors", and Gutfeld's face will contort in heart belly laughs as if hearing it for the first time.
Republican populist humor.
Why, Forrest? Why?
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Opposite spin is the best reason.
There WILL BE spin no matter what.
The Coriolis Effect will see to that.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
For the 1200th time...
I see them.
Two of the 15 screens at the gym are tuned to FOX.DeezerShoove » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Opposite spin is the best reason.
There WILL BE spin no matter what.
The Coriolis Effect will see to that.
I never hear the sound...just see the faces, cc, and chyrons.
It is high comedy..
You "see" them a **** a lot more than I do, clown. If not for you, I would NOT "see" them.
Ya whiny bitch.
Intelligent people discuss ISSUES. Mediocrities talk about people. You're a mediocrity.
Every time I challenge you to talk ISSUES, you run like a little bitch - and then you post some **** calling this or that person a name, using other men's words to make the argument.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Right up there with the genius of zelenskyy?Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Two of the 15 screens at the gym are tuned to FOX.
I never hear the sound...just see the faces, cc, and chyrons.
It is high comedy..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP2EUxdgo-s
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Thanks for admitting you rely on what others tell you to think.Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Two of the 15 screens at the gym are tuned to FOX.
I never hear the sound...just see the faces, cc, and chyrons.
It is high comedy..
Are these the same people who told you that Biden was is fantastic shape and not in cognitive decline? The same people who claimed he only had a stutter? Which is odd because no one could post any audio of him stuttering over his 45 prior years in politics.
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 35 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2743897#p2743897
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 35 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2743897#p2743897
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
I grow weary of the fictional accounts.Cannonpointer » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You "see" them a **** a lot more than I do, clown. If not for you, I would NOT "see" them.
Ya whiny bitch.
Intelligent people discuss ISSUES. Mediocrities talk about people. You're a mediocrity.
Every time I challenge you to talk ISSUES, you run like a little bitch - and then you post some **** calling this or that person a name, using other men's words to make the argument.
You can't talk "ISSUES" because you feed on spam. Every "challenge" rapidly devolves into babbling about non existen public showers, and your fatkiddieporn.
Should any of you half and dim wits ever show you're capable of Argument, I'll be here to disabuse you of your delusions.and then you post some **** calling this or that person a name, using other men's words to make the argument.
Until then I will continue to practice sound rhetorical economy.
Post my words...*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Thanks for admitting you rely on what others tell you to think.
Are these the same people who told you that Biden was is fantastic shape and not in cognitive decline? The same people who claimed he only had a stutter? Which is odd because no one could post any audio of him stuttering over his 45 prior years in politics.
I accept your surrender.
Go back to lying.
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 35 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2743897#p2743897
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 35 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2743897#p2743897
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
If there are hundreds of genders, why does gender reassigtnment surgery only offer one option to those who seek it ?Blackvegetable » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑You can't talk "ISSUES" because you feed on spam. Every "challenge" rapidly devolves into babbling about non existen public showers, and your fatkiddieporn.
Should any of you half and dim wits ever show you're capable of Argument, I'll be here to disabuse you of your delusions.
Run.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
There are, literally, 3 genders.Cannonpointer » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If there are hundreds of genders, why does gender reassigtnment surgery only offer one option to those who seek it ?
Run.
Just as we don't need further granularity past male or female, neuter shouldn't be held to a higher standard.
I am a man. Technically, so are you...even in your mumu...
But "identity" is not a technical matter.
Uh huh. Just three. Okay, fruitcake.
And they are - according to your previous posts - Male, female, and that which you are incompetent to name.
When you say there are three genders but you cannot name them, you expose yourself for a unicorn riding nine year old, fruity.
THERE'S the little girl.Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Just as we don't need further granularity past male or female, neuter shouldn't be held to a higher standard.
Gotta watch out for "granularity."
Run.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
The 3rd gender is "neuter"....when applied to volition, it is "non-binary".Cannonpointer » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Uh huh. Just three. Okay, fruitcake.
And they are - according to your previous posts - Male, female, and that which you are incompetent to name.
When you say there are three genders but you cannot name them, you expose yourself for a unicorn riding nine year old, fruity.
THERE'S the little girl.
Gotta watch out for "granularity."
Run.
Wow. Look at you. The last time you ran from me, you claimed it was the gender that could not be named.Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The 3rd gender is "neuter"....when applied to volition, it is "non-binary".
But you have a yuge problem, fruitcake. You're admittting that all of this gender nonsense is ****. So, you are NOW admitting that gender is sex. Which means when a man says that he is a woman, he is telling a lie based on hard, distinguishable science that you now admit exists.
Run.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
LEARN TO **** READ..Cannonpointer » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Wow. Look at you. The last time you ran from me, you claimed it was the gender that could not be named.
But you have a yuge problem, fruitcake. You're admittting that all of this gender nonsense is ****. So, you are NOW admitting that gender is sex. Which means when a man says that he is a woman, he is telling a lie based on hard, distinguishable science that you now admit exists.
Run.
....when applied to volition, it is "non-binary".
Who is online
In total there are 1624 users online :: 18 registered, 17 bots, and 1589 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, MR-7, *Beekeeper, jerra b, murdock, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, SOCK SAVINGS, Cannonpointer, Cedar, 31st Arrival
Bots: Custo, DuckDuckBot, FDM, proximic, CriteoBot, curl/7, semantic-visions.com, Mediapartners-Google, app.hypefactors.com, Applebot, ADmantX, YandexBot, BLEXBot, bingbot, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, oBot