Liberal Forum

I cornered him with a question that he keeps dodging...yeah, so unusual for him. He literally went back to bump threads from 3 years ago.         
Meltdown Mary is out, but could this be upgraded to nuclear Nancy? 


@Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 22 May 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 10:49 am

I cornered him with a question that he keeps dodging...yeah, so unusual for him. He literally went back to bump threads from 3 years ago.         
Meltdown Mary is out, but could this be upgraded to nuclear Nancy? 

@Blackvegetable

Post my definition of Survivorship bias. 

Vegas » 22 May 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 10:49 am

I cornered him with a question that he keeps dodging...yeah, so unusual for him. He literally went back to bump threads from 3 years ago.         
Meltdown Mary is out, but could this be upgraded to nuclear Nancy? 

@Blackvegetable

I’m beginning to think blackvegetable is maineman 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 6:12 pm

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Cannonpointer » 22 May 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:15 pm

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

it's not a question, **** idiot.



It's a coopdagrase...

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 7:21 am

it's not a question, **** idiot.

It's a coopdagrase...

It's a tail-thumping petition for assistance. 

Or, "question."
 

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:03 am

It's a tail-thumping petition for assistance. 

Or, "question."

Another reason why you are a waste of time.

Vegas has repeated the same lie over several days.

It is now for Vegas to eat well deserved ****.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 6:12 pm

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

Post it yourself. I don't take orders from cowards or narcissists. 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:17 am

Another reason why you are a waste of time.

Vegas has repeated the same lie over several days.

It is now for Vegas to eat well deserved ****.

Your definition was partial, as I demonstrated. Thus, no lie. 

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:20 am

Your definition was partial, as I demonstrated. Thus, no lie.

Post my definition.

Hey @Blackvegetable  , aka coward, aka dumb mother ****. Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:21 am

Post my definition.

Post it yourself. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:03 am

It's a tail-thumping petition for assistance. 

Or, "question."

It's not uncommon for him to have meltdowns, but damn. I didn't expect my question to launch him into orbit like this. He even went back into my profile to post threads from 3 years ago. He deflects regularly, but even that was extreme for him. 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:17 am

Another reason why you are a waste of time.

Vegas has repeated the same lie over several days.

It is now for Vegas to eat well deserved ****.

Have you gone full mode, son? Did Vegas launch you into orbit?      
 
 

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:25 am

Post it yourself.

Kill yourself. 

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:29 am

Have you gone full mode, son? Did Vegas launch you into orbit?    

Vegas is navigating his petard, sidesaddle.

You are riding bitch.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:30 am

Vegas is navigating his petard, sidesaddle.

You are riding bitch.

Well ****? 




Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 6:12 pm

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

Post your mother's smelly crack you little bitch.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 9:30 am

Vegas is navigating his petard, sidesaddle.

You are riding bitch.

Uh huh. And only your mind is keen enough to perceive it.

You must be applying that same level of skyQ that informs your understanding of "gender" - which you CURRENTLY admit is just another word for sex. 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 6:12 pm

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

Here is an idea.  YOU Post YOUR definition of it and then explain why he is wrong.

Or, keep being laughed at for your stupidity.  I am guessing your daughter is an idiot as well if she thinks you are smart,