Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Kill yourself.

You first ***.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:12 pm

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

Maybe he lost it.

Can you give us the link to the copy paste whence you derived it?

I will post it myself, if you do.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Maybe he lost it.

Can you give us the link to the copy paste whence you derived it?

I will post it myself, if you do.

I have it in post # !!.   He gave a partial definition. A vague one. Shocker. 

Hey @Blackvegetable  , aka coward, aka dumb mother ****. Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.
 
 

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

I have it in post # !!.   He gave a partial definition. A vague one. Shocker. 

Hey @Blackvegetable  , aka coward, aka dumb mother ****. Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Sweet Jeebus, I haven't argued this issue and I don't recall hearing the term before you guys raised it, but I knew iummediately which answer fit the definition. 
 

Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Sweet Jeebus, I haven't argued this issue and I don't recall hearing the term before you guys raised it, but I knew iummediately which answer fit the definition.

All of those answers fit his definition, but there is only one correct answer. His definition is ambiguous and incomplete. Math is very precise with its definitions. It has to be. What he did was take an element of a definition (that he still doesn't know) and generalized it. It's like being asked to identify Trump and then saying if he has blue eyes, then it's Trump. Well ok. Yes, Trump has blue eyes, but so do millions of other people. 

Vegas » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

Hey @Blackvegetable  , aka coward, aka dumb mother ****. Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

@Blackvegetable  I won't stop with this you dumb son-of-a-bitch. Run if you want, but I won't stop. It pisses you off too much. So why would I stop?

Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

All of those answers fit his definition, but there is only one correct answer. His definition is ambiguous and incomplete. Math is very precise with its definitions. It has to be. What he did was take an element of a definition (that he still doesn't know) and generalized it. It's like being asked to identify Trump and then saying if he has blue eyes, then it's Trump. Well ok. Yes, Trump has blue eyes, but so do millions of other people.

If his bosses tell him trump's eyes are brown, he will swear up and down that they are.
 

Cannonpointer » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Uh huh. And only your mind is keen enough to perceive it.

You must be applying that same level of skyQ that informs your understanding of "gender" - which you CURRENTLY admit is just another word for sex.

Catch up or/and **** off.

*Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Here is an idea.  YOU Post YOUR definition of it and then explain why he is wrong.

Or, keep being laughed at for your stupidity.  I am guessing your daughter is an idiot as well if she thinks you are smart,

That last one must have left another scar, Melty.

To be clear...

You are suggesting I repost my repost of my definition?
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

That last one must have left another scar, Melty.

To be clear...

You are suggesting I repost my repost of my definition?

LMAO.!


 To be clear…..

There is no context where you could leave a scar on me, Cubicle.


I don’t give a **** what you do, Cubicle.  
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Catch up or/and **** off.

Looks like Nancy is going nuclear.     

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

LMAO.!

 To be clear…..

There is no context where you could leave a scar on me, Cubicle.

I don’t give a **** what you do, Cubicle.

Then why the recurring pre-ignition Issue flare ups?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Then why the recurring pre-ignition Issue flare ups?

Don’t know what you are talking about, Cubicle.  

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Don’t know what you are talking about, Cubicle.

Natch....

That is a question. You will have to figure out like everyone else does.   So, my stand is posted

  

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Natch....

Sure, whatever.  So there is no need for you to run around and dead others repost it.  Got it.  

Carry on, Cubicle.  

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Sure, whatever.  So there is no need for you to run around and dead others repost it.  Got it.  

Carry on, Cubicle.

I'm talking repost of a repost, qui

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Then why the recurring pre-ignition Issue flare ups?

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

*Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Don’t know what you are talking about, Cubicle.

And I even capitalized it to assist your memory.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I'm talking repost of a repost, qui

Good for you, Cubicle.  

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

And I even capitalized it to assist your memory.

Cubicle, that's nice.  But I am not the one with recall issues.

And, I don't even really care.  When I posted the definition of survivor bias you showed how stupid you truly are.

I am just successfully jerking your chain.