Liberal Forum

*Huey » 23 May 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 10:57 am

Cubicle, that's nice.  But I am not the one with recall issues.

And, I don't even really care.  When I posted the definition of survivor bias you showed how stupid you truly are.

I am just successfully jerking your chain.

Cannon got it also. For a guy who incessantly accuses others as being "innumerate" he sure is quite dense. Usually, it's the ones with the superiority complex that knows the least. 

Narcissists. Aren't they real peaches to deal with?       


@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 10:13 am

Catch up or/and **** off.

Here's an idea, you mincing ******. There are four options. Pick one. I did. And mine was right. And I never preened that this was my area of expertise. 

Common sense. I don't even recall ever having heard the term, but the term is bloody self explanatory. I can't believe that a stupid ****** is skirt-hiking. You must have a very low IQ.
 

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 11:02 am

Here's an idea, you mincing ******. There are four options. Pick one. I did. And mine was right. And I never preened that this was my area of expertise. 

Common sense. I don't even recall ever having heard the term, but the term is bloody self explanatory. I can't believe that a stupid ****** is skirt-hiking. You must have a very low IQ.

     

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 11:02 am

Here's an idea, you mincing ******. There are four options. Pick one. I did. And mine was right. And I never preened that this was my area of expertise. 

Common sense. I don't even recall ever having heard the term, but the term is bloody self explanatory. I can't believe that a stupid ****** is skirt-hiking. You must have a very low IQ.

He has been awfully quiet. I can safely assume he is now digging through my profile again to bring up 3 year old threads.       


@Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 11:44 am

He has been awfully quiet. I can safely assume he is now digging through my profile again to bring up 3 year old threads.       

@Blackvegetable

Out hitting golf balls...


This must begin with you posting my definition of Survivorship bias....and acknowledging that you have been lying.

Then, before I need do anything else, you will explain what Survivorship bias has to do with the results of the APSA survey.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:23 pm

This must begin with you posting my definition of Survivorship bias....and acknowledging that you have been lying.


 

Jesus. I already did ****. Stop pretending that you didn't see this. Where is the lie? Yeah, that's what I thought. Now get to it. 

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:23 pm

Then, before I need do anything else, you will explain what Survivorship bias has to do with the results of the APSA survey.

I have one for you. Let's see if you can take what you dish out. Ready? 

Before I do, you must demonstrate that you understand what survivorship bias is. 

       

Now **** your deflections. Acknowledge that you are incessantly deflecting because you still don't know. Do it. 

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 11:02 am

Here's an idea,

Here's a far better idea...

Ask Vegas to elaborate on its application to the APSA survey...he thinks you're too stupid to understand what he's lying about.

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image  

I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 

@Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down. 
Survivorship bias = dead presidents. Image  

 
 

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:35 pm

I have one for you. Let's see if you can take what you dish out. Ready? 

Before I do, you must demonstrate that you understand what survivorship bias is. 

       

Now **** your deflections. Acknowledge that you are incessantly deflecting because you still don't know. Do it.

You've got work to do.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:37 pm

Here's a far better idea...

Ask Vegas to elaborate on its application to the APSA survey...he thinks you're too stupid to understand what he's lying about.

      Here's a far better idea. Acknowledge that you are incessantly deflecting because you are clueless. 




Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:29 pm

Jesus. I already did ****. Stop pretending that you didn't see this. Where is the lie? Yeah, that's what I thought. Now get to it. 

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

**** off with that crap.

Post it.

Now.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:40 pm

**** off with that crap.

Post it.

Now.

You struck through it. God you are **** dumb. So **** stupid. 




Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:39 pm

      Here's a far better idea. Acknowledge that you are incessantly deflecting because you are clueless. 

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

I like this part.

Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means

tell us what it means...

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:41 pm

You struck through it. God you are **** dumb. So **** stupid. 

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Not in a pile of your ****.

You won't even read it.

 

@Blackvegetable  Your strike throughs won't protect you. Your evasions won't protect you. Your deflections won't protect you. This isn't going anywhere. I will continue to repost it until you do one of two things: 

1. Get busy with it
or
2. Finally acknowledge that you have no idea whatsoever. Not **** clue. 

Pick one. 

1. Here comes your lie about me not posting your definition, as if lying protects you.
2. You will now say "prove I am lying" ^^^ So **** stupid. 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:45 pm

Not in a pile of your ****.

You won't even read it.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:43 pm

I like this part.

tell us what it means...

      Now he is asking for my help. Just like last time. 

No chance. Figure it out. 

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:45 pm

@.

Easy.

Vegas » 23 May 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:46 pm

      Now he is asking for my help. Just like last time. 

No chance. Figure it out.

Already did.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2025, 12:47 pm

Already did.

Blatant lie. 

1. prove it. Your claim, your job...video