Liberal Forum

Let's keep this on one thread. Though when you post new OPs, I will post it on there also since your OPs are trash anyway. Also, in post 2 I am going to copy the "are these your words?" post that you keep deflecting to. That way you can just say "post 2" a million times to count for your evasions. 
@Blackvegetable  




Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.
 

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image   I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 
 

Vegas » Today, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:51 pm

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image   I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 

Break that down for us....now that I've defined and categorized it.

Blackvegetable » Today, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:10 pm

Break that down for us....now that I've defined and categorized it.

I already helped you once. You are on your own this time.

Vegas » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

I already helped you once. You are on your own this time.

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Post my definition of Survivorship bias.

Post it yourself. Your recall is ****. It's impossible to take you seriously when your memory is so **** pathetic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

Vegas » Today, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:57 pm

Post it yourself. Your recall is ****. It's impossible to take you seriously when your memory is so **** pathetic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

You have no problem repeating yourself.

You posted the wrong one for weeks...

There is much for which you need be humiliated.


 

Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

You have no problem repeating yourself.

You posted the wrong one for weeks...

There is much for which you need be humiliated.

You evade repeatedly, so I have to repeat the question as to demoralize you. You will go out of your way to evade a question. That means you are scared. Thus, I make it a point to consistently hold it over your stupid *** head. 

Vegas » Today, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:50 pm

Let's keep this on one thread. Though when you post new OPs, I will post it on there also since your OPs are trash anyway. Also, in post 2 I am going to copy the "are these your words?" post that you keep deflecting to. That way you can just say "post 2" a million times to count for your evasions. 
@Blackvegetable  

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Preview of 2026..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux-ycbZWcdY

Plant some phooking eggs..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ0YQ94Z8Ak

Vegas » Today, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:03 pm

You evade repeatedly, so I have to repeat the question as to demoralize you. You will go out of your way to evade a question. That means you are scared. Thus, I make it a point to consistently hold it over your stupid *** head.

You've lied, repeatedly.

When are you gonna break down your own words?

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

You've lied, repeatedly.

When are you gonna break down your own words?

Ghostbusters are eating the tarriffs.

I hear they might be able to help @Vegas  

but we gotta pay for ET to call home first..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaV1r341wYk