Gun Bans Weren't Enough - - Here Comes the Machete Ban....

User avatar
By Skans
28 May 2025 8:33 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 8:33 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
The woke, white limp-dicks of Australia just found out that banning guns does not stop Africans from murdering people.  After 2 African gangs met up at a Victoria mall, slicing and dicing each other an innocent bystanders, the butt-fornicating pirates who have hijackd the Australian Government are now going to ban Machetes.  Machetes are defined to be all large knives, swords, or anything more dangerous than a dull butter knife.

But, are the cowardly Australian citizens asking their government "why" they don't just ban Africans? Clearly a simpler and far more just solution to the problem is for the Australia's homosexual bureaucrats to ban Africans and give Australians their guns back so they can defend themselves. How hard is it for white people to assess the problem and then directly address the problem. 

There must be something in the Australian water that turns men into *** and women into gun-banning bitches. I'm sure the Chinese are at the root of whatever is chemically castrating Australians and turning their brains into gun-ban, knife-ban jello.  It's spread to California and might even spread to a State near YOU.
 
 
 
User avatar
murdock
28 May 2025 9:02 am
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,679 posts
The Brisbane **** club thanks you!
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 9:32 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
murdock » 28 May 2025, 9:02 am » wrote: The Brisbane **** club thanks you!
Africans doing what Africans will do.  And, Australians doing what castrated men will do.
 
User avatar
PhiloBeddo
28 May 2025 11:55 am
User avatar
     
3,370 posts
The only thing that needs to be banned, is protesting
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 12:07 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
PhiloBeddo » 28 May 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: The only thing that needs to be banned, is protesting
Is it fair game to spit on protesters? Shoot soda from a soda bottle at them?  What if the person doing this has a hoodie and a face mask on?
 
User avatar
PhiloBeddo
28 May 2025 12:17 pm
User avatar
     
3,370 posts
The best way to deal with protestors is, Pepper Spray. Heavy duty pepper spray. They will cry like little bitches.
User avatar
Huey
28 May 2025 12:32 pm
User avatar
      
33,800 posts
PhiloBeddo » 28 May 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: The best way to deal with protestors is, Pepper Spray. Heavy duty pepper spray. They will cry like little bitches.

So do KeyBoard Komandos who manage to get pepper sprayed in their driveway.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
murdock
28 May 2025 12:35 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,679 posts
PhiloBeddo » 28 May 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: The only thing that needs to be banned, is protesting

No it doesn't. Protesting is right we have. Now if it turns into a riot, then it's no longer a protest. In case you forgot it's called the right to peaceably assemble.
 
 
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 12:59 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
murdock » 28 May 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: No it doesn't. Protesting is right we have. Now if it turns into a riot, then it's no longer a protest. In case you forgot it's called the right to peaceably assemble.
You can peacefully assemble all you want on your own private property. 

1.  Nothing requires that other private people need to donate their land for peaceful assembly. 

2.  Nothing in the Constitution requires that we, the taxpayers, donate public land upon which to allow people to protest. Broadening the Constitution out  was done by some bogus, liberal court, just pulling **** out of thin air.  That court went above and beyond the bounds of the Constitution. 

So, protesters be damned....unless they are assembling and protesting on land bought and paid for by them..
 
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
28 May 2025 1:06 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Skans » 28 May 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: The woke, white limp-dicks of Australia just found out that banning guns does not stop Africans from murdering people.  After 2 African gangs met up at a Victoria mall, slicing and dicing each other an innocent bystanders, the butt-fornicating pirates who have hijackd the Australian Government are now going to ban Machetes.  Machetes are defined to be all large knives, swords, or anything more dangerous than a dull butter knife.

But, are the cowardly Australian citizens asking their government "why" they don't just ban Africans? Clearly a simpler and far more just solution to the problem is for the Australia's homosexual bureaucrats to ban Africans and give Australians their guns back so they can defend themselves. How hard is it for white people to assess the problem and then directly address the problem. 

There must be something in the Australian water that turns men into *** and women into gun-banning bitches. I'm sure the Chinese are at the root of whatever is chemically castrating Australians and turning their brains into gun-ban, knife-ban jello.  It's spread to California and might even spread to a State near YOU.
What's amazing about this is African ****** are only 1.5% of Australia's population...yet they feel safe enough to chimp out at will against the Humans.    :die:  
 
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 1:08 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
*GHETTOBLASTER » 28 May 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: What's amazing about this is African ****** are only 1.5% of Australia's population...yet they feel safe enough to chimp out at will against the Humans.    Image
Who's going to stop them?  Australian men have been castrated.  Guns and knives taken away and told they cannot defend themselves against entitled Africans.
 
User avatar
murdock
28 May 2025 4:25 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,679 posts
Skans » 28 May 2025, 12:59 pm » wrote: You can peacefully assemble all you want on your own private property. 

1.  Nothing requires that other private people need to donate their land for peaceful assembly. 

2.  Nothing in the Constitution requires that we, the taxpayers, donate public land upon which to allow people to protest. Broadening the Constitution out  was done by some bogus, liberal court, just pulling **** out of thin air.  That court went above and beyond the bounds of the Constitution. 

So, protesters be damned....unless they are assembling and protesting on land bought and paid for by them..
Nope you can protest in public places. That's why we have protests.
 
 
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 4:33 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
murdock » 28 May 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: Nope you can protest in public places. That's why we have protests.
The Constitution doesn't say this.  Just a stupid judge stretching the Constitution said that. 

As for what I can do?  I can do a lot of things.  I can do a lot of illegal things.  I  can even do things the government doesn't know are or are not illegal. But, you know what - NONE OF THE **** I CHOOSE TO DO IS EVEN MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION.

All I'm saying is that people do not have a right to protest on property they don't own, just by claiming its "public".  Don't believe me - ask all those people arrested for protesting on January 6.
 
 
User avatar
murdock
28 May 2025 5:07 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,679 posts
Skans » 28 May 2025, 4:33 pm » wrote: The Constitution doesn't say this.  Just a stupid judge stretching the Constitution said that. 

As for what I can do?  I can do a lot of things.  I can do a lot of illegal things.  I  can even do things the government doesn't know are or are not illegal. But, you know what - NONE OF THE **** I CHOOSE TO DO IS EVEN MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION.

All I'm saying is that people do not have a right to protest on property they don't own, just by claiming its "public".  Don't believe me - ask all those people arrested for protesting on January 6.
Lol, breaking into buildings and tearing up **** isn't protesting. And, it's called the right to peaceably peaceably assemble.
 
User avatar
Skans
28 May 2025 5:11 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
murdock » 28 May 2025, 5:07 pm » wrote: Lol, breaking into buildings and tearing up **** isn't protesting. And, it's called the right to peaceably peaceably assemble.
Yeah, you have a right to peaceably assemble.  Where?  Not anywhere.  On all public property?  No.  On someone else's property? No.  On your own property? Yes.

What to peaceably assemble on I-10?  Go for it....kerplunk kerplunk.
 
 
User avatar
murdock
28 May 2025 5:13 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,679 posts
Skans » 28 May 2025, 5:11 pm » wrote: Yeah, you have a right to peaceably assemble.  Where?  Not anywhere.  On all public property?  No.  On someone else's property? No.  On your own property? Yes.
Lol, I guess all those protests that occur are just imaginary.
User avatar
Skans
29 May 2025 7:39 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
murdock » 28 May 2025, 5:13 pm » wrote: Lol, I guess all those protests that occur are just imaginary.
LOL!!!
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
17 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 4145 users online :: 12 registered, 13 bots, and 4120 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, Baiduspider, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Googlebot, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search