Panama is in NATO?Cannonpointer » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ **** with the bull get the horn, lads.
Fact-checked by AI:
"Yes, Russian forces have indeed targeted ships, including some registered to NATO countries, in the Odesa region of Ukraine. Specifically, a Russian missile strike on a Panamanian-registered ship in Odesa killed eight people, according to BBC News. Additionally, a Russian attack on a grain vessel in Odesa also resulted in casualties, reported by Reuters. These attacks highlight Russia's continued efforts to disrupt maritime traffic in the Black Sea. "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vR6cyNc7QKs
NATO nations flag their commercial ships there. Panama, Liberia, and the Marshal Islands have open registries, allowing pretty much any nation's companies, regardless of national origin or ownership, to flag their vessles there.
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW_GDJJ5QMM
Always remember that whatever the western media admits is maybe ten percent of the real situation on the ground.
Here is what Wiki failed to lie about. Wiki is echoing the propaganda that Odesa is mostly ethnic Coupkrainians. Wiki lies that ethnic Russians comprise only 29% of Odesa. But in their incompetence bred of corruption, they forgot to SCROLL DOWN and edit this part about the languages spoken in Odesa - oops:
Languages Number of speakers
Ukrainian 307,196 30.41%
Russian 654,128 64.75%
If you believe that ethnic Coupkrainians are speaking Russian, bless your heart.![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are AI's admissions, which again is maybe ten percent of the REAL bad news for Coupkraine and the west:
Yes, there are indications that some residents in Odesa, a Ukrainian city, may be challenging the authority of Kyiv, particularly in light of the ongoing war with Russia. While not a widespread or organized rebellion, there are reports of internal disagreements and tensions, fueled by the conflict and the significant impact it has on Odesa.
Here's a more detailed look:
Internal Tensions:
The Russian attacks on Odesa and its port have created internal divisions and anxieties within the city. Some residents may be questioning the effectiveness of Kyiv's leadership or the strategy being used to defend the city.
Impact of the War:
The war has led to the closure of the port, disrupting trade and affecting the city's economy, which has further fueled internal tensions.
Russian Influence:
While the majority of Odesa's population is Ukrainian, there is a significant Russian-speaking population within the city. Some individuals, particularly those with strong Russian ties or sympathies, may be challenging Kyiv's authority or siding with Russia's perspective.
Lack of a Unified Front:
The ongoing war and the internal divisions it has created have made it difficult to establish a unified front within Odesa, potentially making it harder for Kyiv to effectively govern the city.
Symbolic Challenges:
The Russian attacks on Odesa, particularly the port, have been seen as a symbolic challenge to Kyiv's control and authority over the Black Sea region.
Not an Open Rebellion:
It's important to note that this is not a widespread or organized rebellion. Rather, it's a situation of internal tensions and disagreements within the city, exacerbated by the conflict and the actions of Russia.
WW Three will be Free!Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ **** with the bull get the horn, lads.
Fact-checked by AI:
"Yes, Russian forces have indeed targeted ships, including some registered to NATO countries, in the Odesa region of Ukraine. Specifically, a Russian missile strike on a Panamanian-registered ship in Odesa killed eight people, according to BBC News. Additionally, a Russian attack on a grain vessel in Odesa also resulted in casualties, reported by Reuters. These attacks highlight Russia's continued efforts to disrupt maritime traffic in the Black Sea. "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vR6cyNc7QKs
My cousins grew up in East Germany under STASI / Russian rule...Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑If you believe that ethnic Coupkrainians are speaking Russian, bless your heart.
agreed....
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW_GDJJ5QMM
Always remember that whatever the western media admits is maybe ten percent of the real situation on the ground.
Here is what Wiki failed to lie about. Wiki is echoing the propaganda that Odesa is mostly ethnic Coupkrainians. Wiki lies that ethnic Russians comprise only 29% of Odesa. But in their incompetence bred of corruption, they forgot to SCROLL DOWN and edit this part about the languages spoken in Odesa - oops:
Languages Number of speakers
Ukrainian 307,196 30.41%
Russian 654,128 64.75%
If you believe that ethnic Coupkrainians are speaking Russian, bless your heart.![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are AI's admissions, which again is maybe ten percent of the REAL bad news for Coupkraine and the west:
Yes, there are indications that some residents in Odesa, a Ukrainian city, may be challenging the authority of Kyiv, particularly in light of the ongoing war with Russia. While not a widespread or organized rebellion, there are reports of internal disagreements and tensions, fueled by the conflict and the significant impact it has on Odesa.
Here's a more detailed look:
Internal Tensions:
The Russian attacks on Odesa and its port have created internal divisions and anxieties within the city. Some residents may be questioning the effectiveness of Kyiv's leadership or the strategy being used to defend the city.
Impact of the War:
The war has led to the closure of the port, disrupting trade and affecting the city's economy, which has further fueled internal tensions.
Russian Influence:
While the majority of Odesa's population is Ukrainian, there is a significant Russian-speaking population within the city. Some individuals, particularly those with strong Russian ties or sympathies, may be challenging Kyiv's authority or siding with Russia's perspective.
Lack of a Unified Front:
The ongoing war and the internal divisions it has created have made it difficult to establish a unified front within Odesa, potentially making it harder for Kyiv to effectively govern the city.
Symbolic Challenges:
The Russian attacks on Odesa, particularly the port, have been seen as a symbolic challenge to Kyiv's control and authority over the Black Sea region.
Not an Open Rebellion:
It's important to note that this is not a widespread or organized rebellion. Rather, it's a situation of internal tensions and disagreements within the city, exacerbated by the conflict and the actions of Russia.
Not any of them American ships. LOL. Commies killing commies. How is this war bad for the US? The next time Germany and Russia get into it, I'm just hoping the US grabs a bag of popcorn and watches the show. The one good thing coming out of such a war, would be all of the beautiful widows looking for their sugar-ticket to America.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ **** with the bull get the horn, lads.
Fact-checked by AI:
"Yes, Russian forces have indeed targeted ships, including some registered to NATO countries, in the Odesa region of Ukraine. Specifically, a Russian missile strike on a Panamanian-registered ship in Odesa killed eight people, according to BBC News. Additionally, a Russian attack on a grain vessel in Odesa also resulted in casualties, reported by Reuters. These attacks highlight Russia's continued efforts to disrupt maritime traffic in the Black Sea. "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vR6cyNc7QKs
You girls are going to find that it's hard to fight a war in **** pumps and rouge.
Yeah, I doubt the USSR had much patience with occupied Germany. I suppose it's possible that 35 years out, Soviet-influenced linguistic habits linger in Coupkraine. POSSIBLE.ROG62 » Today, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑ My cousins grew up in East Germany under STASI / Russian rule...
in school, Russian was the language of (no) choice that was taught as part of their education...IOW, foreign language class consisted of a choice between Russian, Russian or Russian...
Yeah, ole rog brought that to my attention, too. Might be right. But the linguistic bullying has only run one way for the past couple of generations. I don't know why people who don't like Russians and have a memory of being dominated by Russia would be speaking Russian in their own homes...DeezerShoove » Today, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ English-speaking people aren't necessarily English.
Besides, 7 decades of "occupation" by the USSR is bound to leave a bit of residue.
Jus' sayin' . . . details can be spun. I trust nothing about that mess...
No?
Losing it - and it is lost - humiliated the USA. It signalled to the world that USA dominance is yesterday's headline.
Yeah, NO. First, no military ships belonging to the United States would EVER be flagged under a different nation, like Panama. Private ships, maybe. U.S. Naval vessels - never.
Gosh, really? Heck hoodathunkit.Skans » Today, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, NO. First, no military ships belonging to the United States would EVER be flagged under a different nation, like Panama. Private ships, maybe. U.S. Naval vessels - never.
No war ships - just ***-country ships, USED for war. If you throw a dart at a globe and it lands on a country where dick sucking is perfectly acceptable, they were probably invovled. But NOT with war ships - they don't have the balls. Please try really hard to comprehend that, so you dfon't keep going down that hole.
Keep waiting, child. USA doesn't have the sac to go into the port of Odesa and try that **** flying any but false colors.Skans » Today, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ So, back to you, Blowhard (I’ll sing ye a song o’ the fish o’ the sea, – timme way, hay, blow thar man down!). Show me one American military ship that was sunk by Mammy-Russia yesterday. Flagged American. Not some Panamanian shrimping boat. Not a Japanese whaler. A genuine American Military Naval Vessel. Waiting............................
........ I see, you've got nothing.Cannonpointer » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Gosh, really? Heck hoodathunkit.
The post you answered said nothing about military vessels.
No war ships - just ***-country ships, USED for war. If you throw a dart at a globe and it lands on a country where dick sucking is perfectly acceptable, they were probably invovled. But NOT with war ships - they don't have the balls. Please try really hard to comprehend that, so you dfon't keep going down that hole.
Maybe re-read the OP? That could bring clarity.
Keep waiting, child. USA doesn't have the sac to go into the port of Odesa and try that **** flying any but false colors.
Still at the bottom, son. You're still losing to Vlad. And you're still a secret fanclub member of the gay/tranny alliance. You wanna pretend to be some klind of bisexual fence sitter with no dog in the fight - but look at those teeth gnash. Your a tranny supportimng little neocon.
Sending NATO flagged vessels to the briny deep is "nothing"?Skans » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ........ I see, you've got nothing.
"With the head o’ the codfish he made a fine pipe,The sprat then he salted, but ’twas only a bite.The breeze it blew merrily sailed he, But what an’ ol’ bastard that Cannonpointer must be!"