Once again, there is no such thing as a NATO flagged vessel. Military vessels are flagged with their national flag. Non-military vessels can be flagged with any country, and often are. Russia did not destroy any American warships.Cannonpointer » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Sending NATO flagged vessels to the briny deep is "nothing"?
Exactly. You're learning, trans-national.
And you'd better keep it that way, or get more of the same, sissy-country boy.
Keep singing ditties as your tranny heroes eat Putin's ****, son. WWIII is optional. He's putting your eye-spy weapons carriers on the bottom. He's promising missiles for Berlin. Brandenburg is an hour from Berlin, and it is completely unprotected from any missile moving faster than mach 5. Russia can take out Brandenburg faster than the average U.S. Marine can suck a dick or put on makeup.Skans » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
"With the head o’ the codfish he made a fine pipe,The sprat then he salted, but ’twas only a bite.The breeze it blew merrily sailed he, But what an’ ol’ bastard that Cannonpointer must be!"
I was the one that told YOU that Russia and Germany could end up in a war. This is a German-Russian problem. Not an American one. I've been telling you for a long time now that Russia is occupying a piece of land which was traditionally Prussian, i.e. German. I expect the Germans may eventually grow a set and pounce on Russia to get Königsberg back. And, you ain't seen Ethnic Cleansing until you see how the Germans get rid of the Russians who have been squatting on their land.Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Keep singing ditties as your tranny heroes eat Putin's ****, son. WWIII is optional. He's putting your eye-spy weapons carriers on the bottom. He's promising missiles for Berlin. Brandenburg is an hour from Berlin, and it is completely unprotected from any missile moving faster than mach 5. Russia can take out Brandenburg faster than the average U.S. Marine can suck a dick or put on makeup.
Let that sink in, son. Keep giggling about homosexual countries poking the bear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BifHVDNdims
Nato-COUNTRY flagged vessels. It's in the thread title. Don't let a typo make you think you're sensible, son.Skans » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Once again, there is no such thing as a NATO flagged vessel. Military vessels are flagged with their national flag. Non-military vessels can be flagged with any country, and often are. Russia did not destroy any American warships.
The weapons - carried by a non-American ship, were bought and paid for. We will get paid out of the minerals deal. Don't cry. We are winning.Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nato-COUNTRY flagged vessels. It's in the thread title. Don't let a typo make you think you're sensible, son.
Russia sent american weapons to the bottom of the sea. And america will take it, and america will like it. You're already on board pretending that fist in the *** was "nothing." Keep that good attitude about it, son. Spread it to your tranny rulers.
I don't think it gets stupider than this.Skans » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was the one that told YOU that Russia and Germany could end up in a war. This is a German-Russian problem. Not an American one.
Okay, ya gotme.Skans » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I've been telling you for a long time now that Russia is occupying a piece of land which was traditionally Prussian, i.e. German. I expect the Germans may eventually grow a set and pounce on Russia to get Königsberg back. And, you ain't seen Ethnic Cleansing until you see how the Germans get rid of the Russians who have been squatting on their land.
In a war between Germany and Russia, I would bet on Germany. You can bet on Russia. When the war's done, I'm a coming to collect.Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't think it gets stupider than this.
The US has over 40 military installations in Germany. They are an occupied vassal of the United States.When your dog attacks the neighbor, he doesn't sue your dog.
TRY to do SOME adult level thinking, kid. I cannot imagine anything stupider than the position youjust took.
Okay, ya gotme.
That's stupider.
Russia just beat ALL OF NATO on the battlefield, and you jack off that ONE tranny country is going tobeat Russia. With what weapons? Mach 5 missiles? Cross dressing soldiers fueled by lattes and sex orgies?
I gotta say, son. You're taking dumb to a hole. New level.
There is no minerals deal, there is no we. I'm rootin fer Putin. You stick with the trans agenda, kid. NATO is full ***. And NATO hangs from the US keychain.Skans » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The weapons - carried by a non-American ship, were bought and paid for. We will get paid out of the minerals deal. Don't cry. We are winning.
How'd it work out the last two times, child?Skans » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In a war between Germany and Russia, I would bet on Germany. You can bet on Russia. When the war's done, I'm a coming to collect.
I am an American for America. You go and cheer for Putin all you want. I won't get dragged into that treasonous, un-American ****. You remind me of Hanoi-Jane.Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How'd it work out the last two times, child?
You are CLEARLY not at all educated on this issue. Russia is outproducing and outclassing every NATO country on earth, USA inclusive. More and better. That's what Russia has.
And guess what happens to a Russian soldier who gets caught sucking a dick?
You mean SAINT Hanoi Jane.Skans » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I am an American for America. You go and cheer for Putin all you want. I won't get dragged into that treasonous, un-American ****. You remind me of Hanoi-Jane.
Now go get your shine box with the pride flag.
I'll save your pride flag for wiping my ***. If I want a spit-shine, I'll just pay you a quarter to get on you knees and give me one.
Ranking the nations of the world based on current available firepower.Skans » Today, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ In a war between Germany and Russia, I would bet on Germany. You can bet on Russia. When the war's done, I'm a coming to collect.
Cannonpointer » Today, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, ole rog brought that to my attention, too. Might be right. But the linguistic bullying has only run one way for the past couple of generations. I don't know why people who don't like Russians and have a memory of being dominated by Russia would be speaking Russian in their own homes...
When you embrace the rain, you embrace the mud.Skans » Today, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll save your pride flag for wiping my ***. If I want a spit-shine, I'll just pay you a quarter to get on you knees and give me one.
And I take your point. But I also remind you that vinny and angelo use the bad words and a couple of benedictions. The rest of their conversation is in english, because they don't REALLY know guinea. They just wanna be SEEN asknowing guinea.DeezerShoove » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Tell that **** to my cousins Vinny and Angelo.
Must be they wanna talk wit da relatives.
Just pointing out that the lingo used is not an absolute indicator one way or another.
Cannonpointer » Today, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ And I take your point. But I also remind you that vinny and angelo use the bad words and a couple of benedictions. The rest of their conversation is in english, because they don't REALLY know guinea. They just wanna be SEEN asknowing guinea.
Like Calvin Candie in Django Unchained and the Lingua Granca.