:rofl:*Beekeeper » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And he wonders WHY no one gives 2 **** what they have to say!!
Right @Blackvegetable ??
You're STILL the FORUM'S IDIOT!!
Trump claims win as Florida court rejects Pulitzer Board bid to pause defamation case
President Donald Trump notched a significant legal victory this week in his ongoing effort to strip the New York Times and the Washington Post of their Pulitzer Prizes for reporting on alleged ties between his 2016 campaign and Russia — coverage he claims was false and defamatory.
A Florida appellate court on Wednesday rejected the Pulitzer Prize Board’s attempt to pause the defamation lawsuit, clearing the way for the case to proceed.The board had argued that allowing the litigation to move forward while Trump is serving in office would raise constitutional concerns, but the court dismissed that claim, saying only the president himself could assert such privileges.
“BREAKING! In a major WIN in our powerful lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board regarding the illegal and defamatory ‘Award’ of their once highly respected ‘Prize,’ to fake, malicious stories on the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, by the Failing New York Times and the Washington Compost, the Florida Appellate Court viciously rejected the Defendants’ corrupt attempt to halt the case,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
“They’ll have to give back their ‘Award.’ They were awarded for false reporting, and we can’t let that happen in the United States of America.”
The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Florida issued a seven-page ruling Wednesday that denied the board’s motion to stay proceedings.
The board had argued that allowing the case to proceed while Trump serves in office could raise constitutional issues, including concerns under the Supremacy Clause and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution.
The court flatly rejected that rationale, ruling that such privileges are not transferable to Trump’s legal opponents.
2016 might as well be as relevant as Neanderthals today.. People smear shyt on the Capitol walls and everyone is like "Cool!"
More WINNING for TRUMP. Excellent post Beekeeper.*Beekeeper » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And he wonders WHY no one gives 2 **** what they have to say!!
Right @Blackvegetable ??
You're STILL the FORUM'S IDIOT!!
Trump claims win as Florida court rejects Pulitzer Board bid to pause defamation case
President Donald Trump notched a significant legal victory this week in his ongoing effort to strip the New York Times and the Washington Post of their Pulitzer Prizes for reporting on alleged ties between his 2016 campaign and Russia — coverage he claims was false and defamatory.
A Florida appellate court on Wednesday rejected the Pulitzer Prize Board’s attempt to pause the defamation lawsuit, clearing the way for the case to proceed.The board had argued that allowing the litigation to move forward while Trump is serving in office would raise constitutional concerns, but the court dismissed that claim, saying only the president himself could assert such privileges.
“BREAKING! In a major WIN in our powerful lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board regarding the illegal and defamatory ‘Award’ of their once highly respected ‘Prize,’ to fake, malicious stories on the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, by the Failing New York Times and the Washington Compost, the Florida Appellate Court viciously rejected the Defendants’ corrupt attempt to halt the case,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
“They’ll have to give back their ‘Award.’ They were awarded for false reporting, and we can’t let that happen in the United States of America.”
The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Florida issued a seven-page ruling Wednesday that denied the board’s motion to stay proceedings.
The board had argued that allowing the case to proceed while Trump serves in office could raise constitutional issues, including concerns under the Supremacy Clause and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution.
The court flatly rejected that rationale, ruling that such privileges are not transferable to Trump’s legal opponents.
Fondler doesn't link to his crap...JohnnyYou » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ 2016 might as well be as relevant as Neanderthals today.. People smeared shyt on the Capitol walls and everyone is like "Cool!"
I mean just give it the Old Hillary.... "What the phook does that matter at this point?"
Buzzheeper is probably having Benghazi Syrup on his 5$ Flap Jacks this morning. With a side order of Bealzallahbub Breakfast Meat. With Elon Ketamine Juice..
787 million, and the head of Tuck-Tuck...*Beekeeper » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And he wonders WHY no one gives 2 **** what they have to say!!
Right @Blackvegetable ??
You're STILL the FORUM'S IDIOT!!
Trump claims win as Florida court rejects Pulitzer Board bid to pause defamation case
President Donald Trump notched a significant legal victory this week in his ongoing effort to strip the New York Times and the Washington Post of their Pulitzer Prizes for reporting on alleged ties between his 2016 campaign and Russia — coverage he claims was false and defamatory.
A Florida appellate court on Wednesday rejected the Pulitzer Prize Board’s attempt to pause the defamation lawsuit, clearing the way for the case to proceed.The board had argued that allowing the litigation to move forward while Trump is serving in office would raise constitutional concerns, but the court dismissed that claim, saying only the president himself could assert such privileges.
“BREAKING! In a major WIN in our powerful lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board regarding the illegal and defamatory ‘Award’ of their once highly respected ‘Prize,’ to fake, malicious stories on the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, by the Failing New York Times and the Washington Compost, the Florida Appellate Court viciously rejected the Defendants’ corrupt attempt to halt the case,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
“They’ll have to give back their ‘Award.’ They were awarded for false reporting, and we can’t let that happen in the United States of America.”
The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Florida issued a seven-page ruling Wednesday that denied the board’s motion to stay proceedings.
The board had argued that allowing the case to proceed while Trump serves in office could raise constitutional issues, including concerns under the Supremacy Clause and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution.
The court flatly rejected that rationale, ruling that such privileges are not transferable to Trump’s legal opponents.
ABC News has agreed to pay $15m (£12m) to US President-elect Donald Trump to settle a defamation lawsuit after its star anchor falsely said he had been found "liable for rape".
And you STILL place credence in these MORONS?President Trump’s legal team reportedly rejected a $15 million offer from media conglomerate Paramount to settle a lawsuit he brought against CBS News last year.Lawyers for Paramount made the offer in recent days, according to The Wall Street Journal, and they were rejected by Trump’s team, which is seeking more than $25 million and a formal apology for an interview “60 Minutes” conducted with former Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential race last fall.
787 MILLION, the head of Tuck-Tuck....*Beekeeper » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Awwww. Poor baby.
And you STILL place credence in these MORONS?
YOU only PROVE how much of a **** IDIOT you really are. CONSTANTLY!! On every post. Where you get CURB STOMPED ON!!
https://media.tenor.com/Cijir9vIvYcAAAA ... ns-wwe.gif
Nope. NOT UNTIL you post the PICTURE OF YOUR DUMPLEX!!Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ 787 MILLION, the head of Tuck-Tuck....
AND COUNTING.
Time for you to post a pic of your hovel.
Run.*Beekeeper » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nope. NOT UNTIL you post the PICTURE OF YOUR DUMPLEX!!
Show us that **** you live in beside the SEWAGE SLUDGE RETENTION POND!!
GO!!
NOT ME doing the RUNNING here ASSHOLE!!
Oh, it is...
The Trump administration has lost a shocking 96% of rulings in federal district courts so far this month, according to a recent analysis by Adam Bonica, a professor of political science at Stanford.
SHOW THAT DUMPLEX, ASSHOLE!! on those 5 acres you claim you have!!
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The Trump administration has lost a shocking 96% of rulings in federal district courts so far this month, according to a recent analysis by Adam Bonica, a professor of political science at Stanford.
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-al ... al-losses/
On your tab....
Link?*Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ AND WON A WHOPPING 97% ON APPEAL!!!
Which makes YOUR **** totally irrelevant!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()