Liberal Forum

"[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote. "I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right. Until we are vigilant in enforcing it, the right to bear arms will remain 'a second-class right.'"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-co ... eapon-ban/

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!


After applying that new framework to Maryland's ban, the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the assault weapons ban is constitutional. Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

 It also rejected the challengers' contention that because the guns covered by Maryland's ban are commonly used, they are protected by the Constitution. Instead, the 4th Circuit said adopting this argument would mean that any dangerous weapon "could gain constitutional protection merely because it becomes popular before the government can sufficiently regulate it."

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

 
 

Where's the Ammosexual caterwauling?

[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote.

Free Ride is too modest to reference the abortion, of his authorship, to which he refers. Lower courts have made a sport of challenging its infantile reasoning.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:37 am

"[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote. "I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right. Until we are vigilant in enforcing it, the right to bear arms will remain 'a second-class right.'"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-co ... eapon-ban/

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

After applying that new framework to Maryland's ban, the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the assault weapons ban is constitutional. Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

 It also rejected the challengers' contention that because the guns covered by Maryland's ban are commonly used, they are protected by the Constitution. Instead, the 4th Circuit said adopting this argument would mean that any dangerous weapon "could gain constitutional protection merely because it becomes popular before the government can sufficiently regulate it."

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

The Supreme Court will take up the issue.  But, not to only address the Maryland ban. It wants other state bans included in its decision. This means that other bans still need to make it through their court systems.  The conservative judges just don't want to shoot their wad off prematurely where other slave-states can re-tweak their laws to try and ban them again. 

I expect when the Supreme Court takes up the matter, it will uphold that all American Citizens have a constitutional right to own and shoot an AR-15.  Anyway, that's my prediction.  Wake me up when something actually happens.  
 

Weapons have always been the answer. Those with the biggest and best weapons WIN, EVERYTIME. It's a fact of life.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:37 am

"[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote. "I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right. Until we are vigilant in enforcing it, the right to bear arms will remain 'a second-class right.'"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-co ... eapon-ban/

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

After applying that new framework to Maryland's ban, the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the assault weapons ban is constitutional. Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

 It also rejected the challengers' contention that because the guns covered by Maryland's ban are commonly used, they are protected by the Constitution. Instead, the 4th Circuit said adopting this argument would mean that any dangerous weapon "could gain constitutional protection merely because it becomes popular before the government can sufficiently regulate it."

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

 

Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

The AR 15 Semi automatic was never used in military service.  It was designed for law enforcement and civilians.  Whoever wrote is an idiot and you are dumber for believing it.

The government had an opportunity to regulate back in 1964.  But, BATF determined it was not a NFA weapon and could sold to the public with the tax stamp process.

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd..

If there was a ban on a national level it will only ban NEW rifles.  There are at least 20 million of these weapons in circulation.  And as long as the weapon was manufactured BEFORE the ban went in place, like the 94 ban, you could own or sell it.

Also, the ban and proposed bans all deal with certain parts that do not improve function.  It is all visual.  If there was a ban you just strip away the mean scary parts an you still have a semi automatic that fires 223/556.  So you have accomplished nothing.

 

Anyone who owns an AR-15 should buy their binary triggers and FRT triggers now, while they still can. If you don't know what these are, you should.

There are also some pretty cool SBR-type guns out there that are not SBR's, but ordinary pistols - y'all aught to be looking at those too.

I wish I could give you a good pistol to invest in that will become more valuable years from now. Maybe the Kel Tec P50....

Here's a bucket-list gun.  Maybe if Congress gets silencers off of the NFA I'll buy one. 

I love it when a plan comes together. 

For the gunophobes:

CA Ban Compliant AR:



https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/c ... r15/472134

The only people who hate guns, want to control you. You can't control and armed society. History has proven that. Disarm them and you control them.

Looks like the OP Gunophobe split.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:37 am

"[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote. "I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right. Until we are vigilant in enforcing it, the right to bear arms will remain 'a second-class right.'"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-co ... eapon-ban/

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

After applying that new framework to Maryland's ban, the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the assault weapons ban is constitutional. Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

 It also rejected the challengers' contention that because the guns covered by Maryland's ban are commonly used, they are protected by the Constitution. Instead, the 4th Circuit said adopting this argument would mean that any dangerous weapon "could gain constitutional protection merely because it becomes popular before the government can sufficiently regulate it."

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

Most of us don’t live in MD.  Not sure how it bets uglier.  You should move there.  NH does not have a ban.

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Most of us don’t live in MD.  Not sure how it bets uglier.  You should move there.  NH does not have a ban.

Coward,

Just run.

It's what you do.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Coward,

Just run.

It's what you do.

Actually, you are running from my posts.  Intake it you agree with my posts because you haven’t even tried to refute them.  I accept your surrender.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Actually, you are running from my posts.  Intake it you agree with my posts because you haven’t even tried to refute them.  I accept your surrender.

Tiny,

You're having questions AND follow up questions answered.

And I CLEARLY disagree with your posts and challenge you to defend them.....but you're a dim ******.
 

*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Most of us don’t live in MD.  Not sure how it bets uglier.  You should move there.  NH does not have a ban.

Not sure how it bets uglier.

Because you're an idiot, as we have just demonstrated.

Maryland has seen a decline in gun violence since the enactment of a series of laws aimed at curbing access to dangerous weapons.

 Officials particularly credit a series of federal, state and local restrictions imposed on gun kits in 2022 and 2023 with slowing online sales of untraceable firearms, requiring background and age checks of buyers and banning some kit sales in Maryland altogether.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme ... =122417400

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Tiny,

You're having questions AND follow up questions answered.

And I CLEARLY disagree with your posts and challenge you to defend them.....but you're a dim ******.

after you tell me what is wrong with them.  As a matter of fact what I replied to was not even YOUR WORDS.

1.  It is a fact tThe AR 15 semi auto was never a military weapon.

2.  It is a fact that under the old nationwide ban, and states bans and proposals, only weapons manufactured after the date of enactment are affected.  You can still buy and sell those already in circulation.

3.  It is a fact the these bans and proposals ban exterior, visual and non operational parts.  You them them away and you are still left with a firearm capable of firing a 223/556.  Hence Ban Compliant weapons.

4.  It is a fact that there are over 20 million of these weapons in the US.

There ya have it folks.
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Because you're an idiot, as we have just demonstrated.

ArmsLength, you have not done anything other than lash out.