Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Why?

you're looking at it.

Do you not understand the citation?

Dude, you haven't even read the citation.  After all these years you had to ask if the shorter was mentioned in the article.  If is.  As a CIVILIAN firearm, *******.

Tel us the years the Semi Auto Sporter was standard combat issue in the military?  

Here is the challenge:

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Dude, you haven't even read the citation.  After all these years you had to ask if the shorter was mentioned in the article.  If is.  As a CIVILIAN firearm, *******.


 

But it's about the DESIGN, Quimmie. 

And the fact that the weapons listed are VARIANTS.


 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

But it's about the DESIGN, Quimmie. 

And the fact that the weapons listed are VARIANTS.

All you gotta do is honestly answer these questions:

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

All you gotta do is honestly answer these questions:

 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

What does the article describe "the many" of?

How many families?

How many designs?

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

What does the article describe "the many" of?

How many families?

How many designs?

Already answered multiple times, Cubicle ******.  Your turn.  You have been running from this for ever:

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Already answered multiple times, 

Answer them HONESTLY and this debate is exhausted.

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Answer them HONESTLY and this debate is exhausted.

I have answered them honestly.  You turn.  Answer honestly and the debate is over.  Numbness, if the weapons were both designed for combat the Sporter WOULD NOT have been on the civilian list.  If the Shorter was Designed for Combat like the M 16 you would need to do more than fill out a 4473 to obtain one.  It would have been classified as a NFA weapon in 1964.  

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

*Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I have answered them honestly.  

Really?

How did you do so?

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

*Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

All you gotta do is honestly answer these questions:


 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

What does the article describe "the many" of?

How many families?

How many designs?

 

A variant refers to an alternative or adapted form of a product or system, designed to meet specific needs, preferences, or market requirements. Variants usually coexist within the same time frame, each serving a distinct audience or purpose. They are often derived from a shared base design or platform but differ in specific attributes or features. 

Looks like your argument is dead.

Now, for the questions you have never answered, Cubicle ******:


Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

 

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

A variant refers 

I don't see answers.

 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I don't see answers.

I told you the last time I answered them I would not do it again.

Cubicle Boy, you have NEVER answered this.  You haven't because you know when you do you argument is killed.

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I told you the last time I answered them I would not do it again.

Cubicle Boy, you have NEVER answered this.  You haven't because you know when you do you argument is killed.

Here is the challenge again:


 

I told you the last time I answered them I would not do it again.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I told you the last time I answered them I would not do it again.

You have NEVER answered them.  Now you are lying.  Hell, Cubicle ******, you did not know the Sporter was on the list, in the article, until yesterday.  This is like your 4th lie between yesterday and today.

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:14 am

You have bragged that your penis may be tiny, but your tongue is willing.

You have boasted of whoring.

Until you took a few probing jabs you were inclined to "fighting words".

Can you tell me what this OP is about?

it’s about long rifles 

BuckNaked » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

it’s about long rifles

That dishonest diversion is how you know BV is losing an argument.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:56 am

you marked time....you feel inadequate.....there are millions like you.

And now you can buy what the Service deemed you unfit to carry.

Here's the truth..........58% of all firearm related death are suicides...so toss them out of this discussion.

https://fee.org/articles/are-ar-15-rifl ... -data-say/  

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... e-us/Which types of firearms are most commonly used in gun murders in the U.S.?"In 2023, the most recent year for which the FBI has published data, handguns were involved in 53% of the 13,529 U.S. gun murders and non-negligent manslaughters for which data is available. Rifles – the category that includes guns sometimes referred to as “assault weapons” – were involved in 4% of firearm murders. Shotguns were involved in 1%."        

If you live in areas that are 95% White and Asian combined..your chance of ever being involved in or just witnessing a shooting drop to a level that any sane person would call "SLIM and NONE"     

*Huey » Today, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:47 am

Aside from his overall fear of firearms he does not like Semi Auto Sports Rifles dues to their appearance and whom they attract.

Not everyone can defend themselves with a SUPER NINJA TURTLE SPINNING DECAPITATION KICK like BV can.....

 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Not everyone can defend themselves with a SUPER NINJA TURTLE SPINNING DECAPITATION KICK like BV can.....

He is a real King Fu Panda.

Since he is under the very ignorant and false narrative that the Sporter was designed for the battle he wants it banned. Since it was not designed for the battlefield, it only LOOKS LIKE IT WAS, he really wants it banned for it's appearance.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2025, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 6:37 am

"[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote. "I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right. Until we are vigilant in enforcing it, the right to bear arms will remain 'a second-class right.'"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-co ... eapon-ban/

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

After applying that new framework to Maryland's ban, the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the assault weapons ban is constitutional. Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

 It also rejected the challengers' contention that because the guns covered by Maryland's ban are commonly used, they are protected by the Constitution. Instead, the 4th Circuit said adopting this argument would mean that any dangerous weapon "could gain constitutional protection merely because it becomes popular before the government can sufficiently regulate it."

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

Here ya go Cubicle ******.  This should really scare you:



Introducing the MCX-SPEAR, the civilian version of the U.S. Army’s new XM7 rifle. The MCX-SPEAR is available in 7.62x51 and coming soon in 277 SIG Fury. The next generation has arrived. The MCX-SPEAR by SIG SAUER.

The reason the Army is going back to a larger, more powerful cartridge is 5.56 is not really all that effective contrary to to talking points you use.  It has a longer effective range, increased penetration, and more energy.

Oh, and this was released first and was designed specifically for the civilian market.

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Here ya go Cubicle ******.  This should really scare you:



Introducing the MCX-SPEAR, the civilian version of the U.S. Army’s new XM7 rifle. The MCX-SPEAR is available in 7.62x51 and coming soon in 277 SIG Fury. The next generation has arrived. The MCX-SPEAR by SIG SAUER.

The reason the Army is going back to a larger, more powerful cartridge is 5.56 is not really all that effective contrary to to talking points you use.  It has a longer effective range, increased penetration, and more energy.

Oh, and this was released first and was designed specifically for the civilian market.

Back to debunked jive..