Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Back to debunked jive..

You talk a lot.

You now even less about this than you do the Semi Auto Sporter and those based on its design.  


 

I am glad we got your stance nailed down.

*Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

He is a real King Fu Panda.

Since he is under the very ignorant and false narrative that the Sporter was designed for the battle he wants it banned. Since it was not designed for the battlefield, it only LOOKS LIKE IT WAS, he really wants it banned for it's appearance.

I saw a "melt down" you tube demo done with one of the lowest priced AR15 style rifles that were on the market.
The guy had enough magazines to continuously feed ammo into the rifle for something like 5 minutes if I remember correctly.
The rifle was converted to full auto BTW.
The guy was wearing welder's gloves and other protective gear just in case of an explosion.
The rifle started malfunctioning after 100s of rounds of continuous fire but it still could shoot in single shot mode.
The barrel was glowing red hot after the heat shield grips had melted off the barrel.

I would call that weapon "battle ready".......but so what...?.  

Where I live I can hear my fellow White Land Owners off in the distance and  in all directions "enjoying their rights"...any **** day of the week....  
It makes me feel proud to know that  [[[THE JEWS]]] are still several generations away from being able to disarm the Law Abiding & Self Reliant  Land Owners of the USA......  

 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

I saw a "melt down" you tube demo done with one of the lowest priced AR15 style rifles that were on the market.
The guy had enough magazines to continuously feed ammo into the rifle for something like 5 minutes if I remember correctly.
The rifle was converted to full auto BTW.
The guy was wearing welder's gloves and other protective gear just in case of an explosion.
The rifle started malfunctioning after 100s of rounds of continuous fire but it still could shoot in single shot mode.
The barrel was glowing red hot after the heat shield grips had melted off the barrel.

I would call that weapon "battle ready".......but so what...?.  

Where I live I can hear my fellow White Land Owners off in the distance and  in all directions "enjoying their rights"...any **** day of the week....  
It makes me feel proud to know that  [[[THE JEWS]]] are still several generations away from being able to disarm the Law Abiding & Self Reliant  Land Owners of the USA......

BV knows everything about everything.  

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2025, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 6:37 am

"[F]urther percolation is of little value when lower courts in the jurisdictions that ban AR-15s appear bent on distorting this court's Second Amendment precedents," he wrote. "I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right. Until we are vigilant in enforcing it, the right to bear arms will remain 'a second-class right.'"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-co ... eapon-ban/

A SECOND CLASS RIGHT?????!!!!!!!????

DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!

After applying that new framework to Maryland's ban, the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the assault weapons ban is constitutional. Focusing on the AR-15 in particular, the appeals court found that it is most useful in military service and can be banned consistent with the Second Amendment.

 It also rejected the challengers' contention that because the guns covered by Maryland's ban are commonly used, they are protected by the Constitution. Instead, the 4th Circuit said adopting this argument would mean that any dangerous weapon "could gain constitutional protection merely because it becomes popular before the government can sufficiently regulate it."

And if you don't think it can get any uglier for the Sporting Rifle crowd....

I just caught your thread title when you mentioned Assault Long Rifle on another thread.  According to your title MD just banned the M 16.
 

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I just caught your thread title when you mentioned Assault Long Rifle on another thread.  According to your title MD just banned the M 16.

Stop interpreting.

You suck at it.
 

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

BV knows everything about everything.

Such a boring and pathetic life he lives with no real purpose other than to spend all day, every day venting his anger, frustration  and jealousy at the rest of us.....  
 

@Blackvegetable  

You know everything.  You should be able to answer.  Is a Semi Auto Sports rifle, sometimes called an assault weapon, that only shoots 223 a weapon designed for the battlefield?

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Stop interpreting.

You suck at it.

But, ya big dum dum, by definition, by definition the weapon in question is NOT an Assault Rifle.

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

@Blackvegetable  

You know everything.  You should be able to answer.  Is a Semi Auto Sports rifle, sometimes called an assault weapon, that only shoots 223 a weapon designed for the battlefield?

I don't know why you keep using tags while wearing the @*......Vagina No Contact Surrender tunic...


 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Such a boring and pathetic life he lives with no real purpose other than to spend all day, every day venting his anger, frustration  and jealousy at the rest of us.....

Right now he is in maximum Nuclear Nancy mode.  He is chasing me from thread to thread thinking he is being witty with pitiful attack type posts.  It is pretty funny.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I don't know why you keep using tags while wearing the @*......Vagina No Contact Surrender tunic...

Last I checked you are participating on this thread.  You always lie by omission.

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Last I checked you are participating on this thread.  You always lie by omission.

I don't care about your invented excuse, I'm trying to suss the logic of your suffocating hypocrisy...

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I don't know why you keep using tags while wearing the @*......Vagina No Contact Surrender tunic...

An assault rifle is defined as a selective-fire firearm that fires an intermediate-power cartridge and is capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. It typically uses a detachable magazine and is designed for military use. The term "assault rifle" is often used interchangeably with "assault weapon," but this is incorrect as "assault weapon" is a broader term that can include semi-automatic rifles. 

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

I don't care about your invented excuse, I'm trying to suss the logic of your suffocating hypocrisy...

Here is some logic for you:


I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.
 

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Here is some logic for you:

I will take the L when you do the following:


 

Your credit is no good and your words are perishable.

Speaks to your character 

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

*Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Last I checked you are participating on this thread.  You always lie by omission.

I don't care about your invented excuse, I'm trying to suss the logic of your suffocating hypocrisy...

 

Gulf War, 1991. A Marine officer reported that "several Marines commented that they had to shoot Iraqi soldiers 2-3 or more times with the 62-grain 5.56mm green tip ammo before they stopped firing back at them.... An Iraqi officer, still on fire, faced the firing line of Marines and charged forward firing his weapon from the hip. He didn't hit anyone, but two Marines each nailed him with a three-- round burst from their M-16A2s. One burst hit him immediately above his heart, the other in his belly button. [He] ... kept right on charging and firing until his magazine was empty.... The surgeons told me he certainly died of burns, but not necessary from the six 5.56-mm wounds."Somalia, 1993. Army Sergeant First Class Paul Howe, a Delta Force soldier, noted that the 5.56-mm green-tip round made a small clean hole and passed right through the enemy. Unless it happened to hit the heart or spine, it was not enough to stop a man in his tracks. "Howe felt like he had to hit a guy five or six times just to get his attention."
 Afghanistan, 2002. A soldier who preferred to remain anonymous e-mailed the following account to me in April 2002: "The current-issue 62-grain 5.56-mm (.223) round, especially when fired from the short-barreled, M-4 carbine, is proving itself (once again) to be woefully inadequate as [a] man stopper. Engagements at all ranges are requiring multiple, solid hits to permanently bring down enemy soldiers. Penetration is also sadly deficient. Even light barriers are not perforated by this rifle and cartridge combination."

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedi ... -not-rifle

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Here is some logic for you:

I will take the L when you do the following:



 

Your credit is no good and your words are perishable.

Speaks to your character 

 

My credit is outstanding.  You never have defeated me in a challenge 

Run, ******, Run

Here is some logic for you:


I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

These reports are consistent with my experience during three tours of duty in Vietnam from 1964 to 1969. It was apparent that the 5.56-mm cartridge was nothing more than the commercial Remington .223 cartridge used for hunting small game. (The state of Virginia does not permit it to be used for hunting deer because it cannot ensure a "clean kill" on deer.) Yet its full-metal-jacket military counterpart continues to be issued to U.S. combatants for the purpose of knocking down and killing or disabling enemy soldiers.

*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

My credit is outstanding.  You never have defeated me in a challenge 

Run, ******, Run

Here is some logic for you:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

My credit is outstanding.  

:rofl:  

You never have defeated me in a challenge 

:die:   :die: