Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

 

 

found that pic yet?  You owe me some time on that one.

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

found that pic yet?  You owe me some time on that one.

 

Mr. Other Charlieze,

I say that your ongoing meltdown over that is telling.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Mr. Other Charlieze,

I say that your ongoing meltdown over that is telling.

And again, The weapon in question is not, by definition, an Assault Rifle.

LMAO!

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

And again, The weapon in question is not, by definition, an Assault Rifle.

 

How does the law in Maryland define the "civilian" variant, patterned on the original AR-15 design?

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

How does the law in Maryland define the "civilian" variant, patterned on the original AR-15 design?

In the title they define as an assault WEAPON.  I posted definitions for you earlier. It uses assault long gun once and  then the article claims Maryland owners brought forward a case that challenged the law in 2020, arguing that they have a Second Amendment right to own common assault rifles.  Assault Weapon  is used multiple times.

No mention of assault rifle in reference to the MD Law.

Acknowledge you were answered.

An assault rifle is defined as a selective-fire firearm that fires an intermediate-power cartridge and is capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. It typically uses a detachable magazine and is designed for military use. The term "assault rifle" is often used interchangeably with "assault weapon," but this is incorrect as "assault weapon" is a broader term that can include semi-automatic rifles.

The assault weapon you refer to is not a select fire weapon.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2025, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 6:37 am

 

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

*Huey » Today, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:26 pm

In the title they define as an assault WEAPON.  I posted definitions for you earlier. It uses assault long gun once and  then the article claims Maryland owners brought forward a case that challenged the law in 2020, arguing that they have a Second Amendment right to own common assault rifles.  Assault Weapon  is used multiple times.

No mention of assault rifle in reference to the MD Law.

Acknowledge you were answered.

An assault rifle is defined as a selective-fire firearm that fires an intermediate-power cartridge and is capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. It typically uses a detachable magazine and is designed for military use. The term "assault rifle" is often used interchangeably with "assault weapon," but this is incorrect as "assault weapon" is a broader term that can include semi-automatic rifles.

The assault weapon you refer to is not a select fire weapon.

@Blackvegetable  

You got the acknowledgement you were answered?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:12 pm

Mr. Other Charlieze,

I say that your ongoing meltdown over that is telling.

Everyone debating hypothetical values of tomorrow(midnight to noon) never admit they are repeating yesterday's(Noon to midnight) mistakes for generations in history so far dawn to dusk in their geographical location(longitude and latitude) now.

Climate is never the same at the same time geographically in this atmosphere same rotation as ancestors alive so far. two icecap axis points with one equator of rotation at the widest circumference on a tilted axis. dawn and dusk are physical edges between daytime facing the core of the solar system and night looking at the universe beyond being alive now as individually evolving as part of the whole process.

*Huey » Yesterday, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:50 pm

@Blackvegetable  

You got the acknowledgement you were answered?

BV's just trolling you.  You beat him pages ago and he knows it.  
 

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:26 pm

In the title they define as an assault WEAPON.  I posted definitions for you earlier. It uses assault long gun once and  then the article claims Maryland owners brought forward a case that challenged the law in 2020, arguing that they have a Second Amendment right to own common assault rifles.  Assault Weapon  is used multiple times.

You're wrong.

The Maryland State Police is responsible for reaching its own conclusions with respect to whether particular firearms are copies of enumerated banned firearms. In reaching those conclusions, the Maryland State Police adheres to the process articulated in the Firearms Bulletin #10-2 dated November 4, 2010 a copy of which may be found on our website. To that end, the Maryland State Police has determined that, for enforcement purposes, a firearm is considered a copy if it is both cosmetically similar to and has completely interchangeable internal components necessary for the full operation and function of one of the enumerated banned weapons.

This list represents those determinations. It includes weapons that are: 

1. Firearms defined under State law as "assault long guns," including firearms specifically enumerated under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article and their copies. 
 
https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/ ... earch.aspx

Now try answering the question,  honestly.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:26 pm

In the title they define as an assault WEAPON.  I posted definitions for you earlier. It uses assault long gun once and  then the article claims Maryland owners brought forward a case that challenged the law in 2020, arguing that they have a Second Amendment right to own common assault rifles.  Assault Weapon  is used multiple times.

You're wrong.

The Maryland State Police is responsible for reaching its own conclusions with respect to whether particular firearms are copies of enumerated banned firearms. In reaching those conclusions, the Maryland State Police adheres to the process articulated in the Firearms Bulletin #10-2 dated November 4, 2010 a copy of which may be found on our website. To that end, the Maryland State Police has determined that, for enforcement purposes, a firearm is considered a copy if it is both cosmetically similar to and has completely interchangeable internal components necessary for the full operation and function of one of the enumerated banned weapons.

This list represents those determinations. It includes weapons that are: 

1. Firearms defined under State law as "assault long guns," including firearms specifically enumerated under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article and their copies. 
 
https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/ ... earch.aspx

Now try answering the question,  honestly.

 

You did not say assault long guns.  You said assault long rifles.  I accept your admission you were wrong.  Read your title,

Never heard of an assault long gun.  Sounds like another made up term like Assault Weapon.

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

You did not say assault long guns.  

You are wrong.

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

You did not say assault long guns.  

You are wrong.

 

 

I am not playing your editing post that **** your argument.  Go ahead and me to post your thread title, ******.  I dare ya.

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:26 pm

In the title they define as an assault WEAPON.  I posted definitions for you earlier. It uses assault long gun once and  then the article claims Maryland owners brought forward a case that challenged the law in 2020, arguing that they have a Second Amendment right to own common assault rifles.  Assault Weapon  is used multiple times.

You're wrong.

The Maryland State Police is responsible for reaching its own conclusions with respect to whether particular firearms are copies of enumerated banned firearms. In reaching those conclusions, the Maryland State Police adheres to the process articulated in the Firearms Bulletin #10-2 dated November 4, 2010 a copy of which may be found on our website. To that end, the Maryland State Police has determined that, for enforcement purposes, a firearm is considered a copy if it is both cosmetically similar to and has completely interchangeable internal components necessary for the full operation and function of one of the enumerated banned weapons.

This list represents those determinations. It includes weapons that are: 

1. Firearms defined under State law as "assault long guns," including firearms specifically enumerated under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article and their copies. 
 
https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/ ... earch.aspx

Now try answering the question,  honestly.


 

You did not say assault long guns.  You said assault long rifles.  I accept your admission you were wrong.  Read your title,

Never heard of an assault long gun.  Sounds like another made up term like Assault Weapon.

 

 

Skans » Today, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:43 pm

BV's just trolling you.  You beat him pages ago and he knows it.

You're as **** stupid as he is.



This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column.

*Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I am not 

YOU were wrong.

Now answer the question,  honestly.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I am not 

YOU were wrong.

Now answer the question,  honestly.

 

 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

You did not say assault long guns.  

You are wrong.

 


 

I am not playing your editing post that **** your argument.  Go ahead and me to post your thread title, ******.  I dare ya.

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

You're wrong.

The Maryland State Police is responsible for reaching its own conclusions with respect to whether particular firearms are copies of enumerated banned firearms. In reaching those conclusions, the Maryland State Police adheres to the process articulated in the Firearms Bulletin #10-2 dated November 4, 2010 a copy of which may be found on our website. To that end, the Maryland State Police has determined that, for enforcement purposes, a firearm is considered a copy if it is both cosmetically similar to and has completely interchangeable internal components necessary for the full operation and function of one of the enumerated banned weapons.

This list represents those determinations. It includes weapons that are: 

1. Firearms defined under State law as "assault long guns," including firearms specifically enumerated under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article and their copies. 
 
https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/ ... earch.aspx

Now try answering the question,  honestly.



 

You did not say assault long guns.  You said assault long rifles.  I accept your admission you were wrong.  Read your title,

Never heard of an assault long gun.  Sounds like another made up term like Assault Weapon.


 

 

 

Your thread title, ******:

Re: Free Ride's Love For The Oppressed "Assault Long Rifles"
 

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:09 pm

found that pic yet?  You owe me some time on that one.

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

wait 5 days off or a whole month off?   What does he have to do if he is wrong?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:17 pm

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:14 pm

And again, The weapon in question is not, by definition, an Assault Rifle.


 

How does the law in Maryland define the "civilian" variant, patterned on the original AR-15 design?

 

Here is your answer,  Not as Assault Long Rifles.

Your thread title my bitch:

Re: Free Ride's Love For The Oppressed "Assault Long Rifles"

BuckNaked » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

wait 5 days off or a whole month off?   What does he have to do if he is wrong?

He knows he lost.  So I made easy for him to admit how **** wrong he has been all this time.

If thought he had won he would have accepted the challenge a long time ago.  He ignores it because he is a ****** when he wrong.

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

He knows he lost.  So I made easy for him to admit how **** wrong he has been all this time.

If thought he had won he would have accepted the challenge a long time ago.  He ignores it because he is a ****** when he wrong.

oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhh