Nope.Mrkelly » Yesterday, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did the get the term “assault weapons” ?
it was a gift from gun manufacturers
Mrkelly » Yesterday, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑I was talking about how stupid it is for you to try and say that the gun grabbers came up with “assault rifles “
you know that of course![]()
I know I hurt you lil feelers
but you will get over it
Mrkelly » Yesterday, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did the get the term “assault weapons” ?
it was a gift from gun manufacturers
Nearly 8 years...*Huey » Yesterday, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ This goes in the archive with the following:
He called C4 C5.
He said the PK was where soldiers go to buy food.
He called CS gas CV gas.
Tiny,*Huey » Yesterday, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah, it has to do with you know absolutely about the military. You even know where weapons are stored when in garrison.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
We've exposed what a fraud your claim of omniscience on this topic is.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column.
Again … where did they get the idea to call them that?*Huey » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.
https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column.
*Huey » Yesterday, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No, they didn't. We are talking about Assault Weapons. You posted about Assault Rifles. The weapons this thread is about are NOT select fire weapons. Posted this earlier:
An assault rifle is defined as a selective-fire firearm that fires an intermediate-power cartridge and is capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. It typically uses a detachable magazine and is designed for military use. The term "assault rifle" is often used interchangeably with "assault weapon," but this is incorrect as "assault weapon" is a broader term that can include semi-automatic rifles
Now tell us what rifle is the subject of the OP?
How many times where you dropped on your head as a child?Mrkelly » Yesterday, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑Again … where did they get the idea to call them that?
blame the gun grabbers all you want
The gun manufacturers **** in their nest when they coined the phrase “assault rifle” to sell what ever you guys want to call the guns on those gun magazine covers
the anti gun nuts took the gift and ran
admit it or not
kinda like their “deplorables” moment
*Huey » Yesterday, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ How many times where you dropped on your head as a child?
There are two different terms. One is for semi aunts and Wes invented in the 80s by the anti gun nuts. It is right there in the post ya ******* ****.
Assault Rifledates bak to **** WW2.
The term assault rifle is generally attributed to Adolf Hitler, who used the German word Sturmgewehr (which translates to "assault rifle") as the new name for the MP 43 (Maschinenpistole), subsequently known as the Sturmgewehr 44.[6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Allied propaganda suggested that the name was chosen for propaganda purposes, but the main purpose was to differentiate the Sturmgewehr from German submachine guns such as the MP 40.[15]It has been suggested, however, that the Heereswaffenamt was responsible for the name Sturmgewehr, and Hitler had no input besides signing the production order.[16][15] Furthermore, Hitler was initially opposed to the idea of a new infantry rifle, as Germany lacked the industrial capacity to replace the 12,000,000 Karabiner 98krifles already in service, only changing his mind once he saw it first-hand.[17]The StG 44 is generally considered the first selective fire military rifle to popularize the assault rifle concept.[6][8] Today, the term assault rifle is used to define firearms sharing the same basic characteristics as the StG 44.[6][8]
Damn you are **** ignorant. BBL to see if it finally sunk in. Those who claim you are a good guy are wrong. You are as **** stupid as BV on this topic. You know you are wrong and you are too **** stupid to admit.
Error*Huey » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.
https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf
@Mrkelly*Huey » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.
https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf
Is an assault rifle considered to be a weapon?*Huey » Yesterday, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ That was a mistake. I repeatably post this thread is about a weapon that is considered an Assault WEAPON.
That is how a man admits he is wrong. I guess you are not a man. You are POS.