Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm

Where did the get the term “assault weapons” ?

it was a gift from gun manufacturers

Nope.
 
 

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 10:08 am

  I was talking about how stupid it is for you to try and say that the gun grabbers came up with “assault rifles “

you know that of course   

I know I hurt you lil feelers

but you will get over it 

I didn't say gun grabbers came up with the term assault rifle.  I said they came up with assault WEAPON. Plus, this thread is not about assault RIFLES..


Assault RIFLE dates back to Hitler:

No, it was not.

The term assault rifle is generally attributed to Adolf Hitler, who used the German word Sturmgewehr (which translates to "assault rifle") as the new name for the MP 43 (Maschinenpistole), subsequently known as the Sturmgewehr 44.[6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Allied propaganda suggested that the name was chosen for propaganda purposes, but the main purpose was to differentiate the Sturmgewehr from German submachine guns such as the MP 40.[15]It has been suggested, however, that the Heereswaffenamt was responsible for the name Sturmgewehr, and Hitler had no input besides signing the production order.[16][15] Furthermore, Hitler was initially opposed to the idea of a new infantry rifle, as Germany lacked the industrial capacity to replace the 12,000,000 Karabiner 98krifles already in service, only changing his mind once he saw it first-hand.[17]The StG 44 is generally considered the first selective fire military rifle to popularize the assault rifle concept.[6][8] Today, the term assault rifle is used to define firearms sharing the same basic characteristics as the StG 44.[6][8]
 

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm

Where did the get the term “assault weapons” ?

it was a gift from gun manufacturers

The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.


https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 12:12 pm

This goes in the archive with the following:

He called C4 C5.

He said the PK was where soldiers go to buy food.

He called CS gas CV gas.

Nearly 8 years...

Quite a haul.


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm

Nearly 8 years...

Quite a haul.

Nah, it has to do with you know absolutely about the military.  You even know where weapons are stored when in garrison.

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm

Nah, it has to do with you know absolutely about the military.  You even know where weapons are stored when in garrison.

Tiny,

We've exposed what a fraud your claim of omniscience on this topic is.


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm

Tiny,

We've exposed what a fraud your claim of omniscience on this topic is.

LMAO!

NO ONE who served was ever issued an Semi Auto AR 15 Colt Sport or one of it.s descendants, regardless of manufacturer, as a personal weapon.

There is nothing further for me to argue on this point.  

Carry on.  Don't bother asking questions.  They will all be answered with the link from my sig box.  Now, you can be a man make your case.  Without questions.

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm

LMAO!


 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column.

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.

https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf

Again … where did they get the idea to call them that?

blame the gun grabbers all you want

The gun manufacturers **** in their nest when they coined the phrase “assault rifle” to sell what ever you guys want to call the guns on those gun magazine covers

the anti gun nuts took the gift and ran 

admit it or not

kinda like their “deplorables” moment 


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column.

Tell me.  Which list is the AR 15 Sporter in?

I'll wait.  BBL

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 1:23 pm

No, they didn't.  We are talking about Assault Weapons.  You posted about Assault Rifles.  The weapons this thread is about are NOT select fire weapons.  Posted this earlier:

An assault rifle is defined as a selective-fire firearm that fires an intermediate-power cartridge and is capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. It typically uses a detachable magazine and is designed for military use. The term "assault rifle" is often used interchangeably with "assault weapon," but this is incorrect as "assault weapon" is a broader term that can include semi-automatic rifles

Now tell us what rifle is the subject of the OP?

 

[img]blob:8e614d05-0d09-4f40-afc4-8e0421e4e6d2[/img]
https://www.shutterstock.com/shuttersto ... 605725.jpg
 
 

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:52 pm

 

[img]blob:8e614d05-0d09-4f40-afc4-8e0421e4e6d2[/img]
https://www.shutterstock.com/shuttersto ... 605725.jpg

This thread about Assault Rifles.  How **** stupid are you?

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf

Again … where did they get the idea to call them that?

blame the gun grabbers all you want

The gun manufacturers **** in their nest when they coined the phrase “assault rifle” to sell what ever you guys want to call the guns on those gun magazine covers

the anti gun nuts took the gift and ran 

admit it or not

kinda like their “deplorables” moment

How many times where you dropped on your head as a child?

There are two different terms.  One is for semi aunts and Wes invented in the 80s by the anti gun nuts.  It is right there in the post ya ******* ****.

Assault Rifledates bak to **** WW2.

The term assault rifle is generally attributed to Adolf Hitler, who used the German word Sturmgewehr (which translates to "assault rifle") as the new name for the MP 43 (Maschinenpistole), subsequently known as the Sturmgewehr 44.[6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Allied propaganda suggested that the name was chosen for propaganda purposes, but the main purpose was to differentiate the Sturmgewehr from German submachine guns such as the MP 40.[15]It has been suggested, however, that the Heereswaffenamt was responsible for the name Sturmgewehr, and Hitler had no input besides signing the production order.[16][15] Furthermore, Hitler was initially opposed to the idea of a new infantry rifle, as Germany lacked the industrial capacity to replace the 12,000,000 Karabiner 98krifles already in service, only changing his mind once he saw it first-hand.[17]The StG 44 is generally considered the first selective fire military rifle to popularize the assault rifle concept.[6][8] Today, the term assault rifle is used to define firearms sharing the same basic characteristics as the StG 44.[6][8]

Damn you are **** ignorant. BBL to see if it finally sunk in.  Those who claim you are a good guy are wrong.  You are as **** stupid as BV on this topic.  You know you are wrong and you are too **** stupid to admit.

 
 

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm

This thread about Assault Rifles.  How **** stupid are you?

  Mr thread integrity   

so was the magazine covers 

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm

How many times where you dropped on your head as a child?

There are two different terms.  One is for semi aunts and Wes invented in the 80s by the anti gun nuts.  It is right there in the post ya ******* ****.

Assault Rifledates bak to **** WW2.

The term assault rifle is generally attributed to Adolf Hitler, who used the German word Sturmgewehr (which translates to "assault rifle") as the new name for the MP 43 (Maschinenpistole), subsequently known as the Sturmgewehr 44.[6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Allied propaganda suggested that the name was chosen for propaganda purposes, but the main purpose was to differentiate the Sturmgewehr from German submachine guns such as the MP 40.[15]It has been suggested, however, that the Heereswaffenamt was responsible for the name Sturmgewehr, and Hitler had no input besides signing the production order.[16][15] Furthermore, Hitler was initially opposed to the idea of a new infantry rifle, as Germany lacked the industrial capacity to replace the 12,000,000 Karabiner 98krifles already in service, only changing his mind once he saw it first-hand.[17]The StG 44 is generally considered the first selective fire military rifle to popularize the assault rifle concept.[6][8] Today, the term assault rifle is used to define firearms sharing the same basic characteristics as the StG 44.[6][8]

Damn you are **** ignorant. BBL to see if it finally sunk in.  Those who claim you are a good guy are wrong.  You are as **** stupid as BV on this topic.  You know you are wrong and you are too **** stupid to admit.

 

poor lil triggered Cletus   
 

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:58 pm

  Mr thread integrity   

so was the magazine covers

That was a mistake.  I repeatably post this thread is about a weapon that is considered an Assault WEAPON.

That is how a man admits he is wrong.  I guess you are not a man.  You are POS.

Mrkelly » 06 Jun 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 3:00 pm

 

poor lil triggered Cletus 

I **** stomped your ignorant ***.  You have gone from bering wrong to being a ****** liar.  

I hope you learned the difference between the terms Assault RIFLE and the lefty created Assault WEAPON.

You brought that showed I am wrong.  **** you , POS.  I am not triggered.  I am flabbergasted at your stupidity and the fact that people on this forum have claimed you are an honest poster.  You are not.  You are a liar and here to **** with people.

I told you not to fuc with me on this.  You lose.

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.

https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf

Error
 

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

The term "Assault Weapon",
coined in the 1980's in an effort
to ban semiautomatic rifles, has
arguably become one of the most
successful antigun public relations
tools in modern history. The term
"assault weapon" is now broadly
used by antigun activists to describe
any and all semiautomatic firearms
as taboo and undesirable for private
civilian ownership, despite being
legally owned and used by millions
of Americans. Antigun politicians
and misinformed media have
p e r p e t u a t e d this e r r o n e o u s moniker
for decades to drive public opinion
of semiautomatic firearms into t h e
gutter. As a result, m a n y think that
a semiautomatic firearm is a so-
called "assault weapon" based on
its c o s m e t i c f e a t u r e s or a s s u m e that
the firearm is in fact a fully automatic
m a c h i n e gun.

https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/ho ... -SD017.pdf

@Mrkelly  

The proof I was right concerning who coined the term assault weapon.  The thread is about a weapon deemed an assault weapon.

You lose.

*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2025, 3:20 pm

That was a mistake.  I repeatably post this thread is about a weapon that is considered an Assault WEAPON.

That is how a man admits he is wrong.  I guess you are not a man.  You are POS.

Is an assault rifle considered to be a weapon? 

admit it or not

the gun people **** in their own hats bragging about “assault rifles”

just gave ammunition to the enemy