Because I believe in the rule of law. If you don't like current immigration law, change it, but until then follow the **** law.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Why you believe those constitute rational arguments...
I know you aren't bright, but how not bright can you be?
Why don’t YOU tell us what is bad about it.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑It was ramped up 3X overnight.Cedar » 18 Jun 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ Really? Any undertaking of this magnitude takes time to ramp up. 1000 a day was 1000 better than the previous admin, now that the wheels are greased time to pick up speed.
Now tell me what's "GOOD" about trying to deport every illegal alien.
What part of "illegal" do you have problems with?Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ It was ramped up 3X overnight.
Now tell me what's "GOOD" about trying to deport every illegal alien.
Cedar » 18 Jun 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ Because I believe in the rule of law. If you don't like current immigration law, change it, but until then follow the **** law.
that is incongrous in the context of your recent voting history.Because I believe in the rule of law
Cheddy, please.....you're slaying me.but until then follow the **** law.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ The change in the law had nothing to do with Grifty.
His request for en banc was taintpunted 8-2.
You don't know anything and understand even less.
Thanks for verifying you're a ******...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I took 6 years of Latin.*Beekeeper » 18 Jun 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Define EX POST FACTO if you have the INTELLIGENCE to do so.
GO!!
or run as you ALWAYS do when confronted with REAL FACTS!!
The vapidity of it.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑
because that's a question, Askholio .....and you have issues with those.
Is that the rule now?*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently there is nothing bad with it. I appreciate your stand.
Pleased to hear it, Toady..I appreciate your stand.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑Is that the rule now?*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently there is nothing bad with it. I appreciate your stand.
Grifty proposes something stupid, is told by a lot of people that it is stupid, confesses that it is stupid, announces that changes are coming to stupid, announces these changes to stupid, then walks back the non stupid to reimpose the stupid.Pleased to hear it, Toady..I appreciate your stand.
Stop declaring things you don't have the peas to support.*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ That part of the thread was over yesterday. You are just too stupid to figure it out.
Edited for character count.Cedar » 17 Jun 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑You’re a day late, dollar short, that policy was walked back yesterday, Moran.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ As in "so **** g'ddammned stupid they should have been smothered in their cribs".
Nod.
**chuckle**
Edited for character count.Cedar » 17 Jun 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigrat ... ion-raids/Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ I'm getting whiplash..
Which one did TACO "walk back"?
You might want you to find a news source that is actually current.
*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑No need. The policy has been reversed. Don’t bother with the link. Thread fail.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Read this again.
The piece is riddled with hyperlinks. If you take issue with the facts, make a case...
![]()
I know, right?
https://www.axios.com/2025/06/17/trump- ... tion-raids
Supported. Speaking not having the peas....33 miles.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑Stop declaring things you don't have the peas to support.*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ That part of the thread was over yesterday. You are just too stupid to figure it out.
what did I tell you it was NOT about, 43MilesShort&WideOpen?*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Edited for character count.
Supported. Speaking not having the peas....33 miles.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑what did I tell you it was NOT about, 43MilesShort&WideOpen?*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Edited for character count.
Supported. Speaking not having the peas....33 miles.
Answer the question, Controlly.
Try again. Edited quotes are a no no for civil discourse.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑Answer the question, Controlly.*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Next time, in the OP, make it very clear what you wish to discuss, Because right now you are twisting yourself into a pretzel tryin go to spin your way out of it.
Reposting portions of the OP is not making making your case for what you wish to discuss. Stop being a ****** and go on record in your own words.
*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑what did I tell you it was NOT about, 43MilesShort&WideOpen?*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Edited for character count.
Supported. Speaking not having the peas....33 miles.
Next time, in the OP, make it very clear what you wish to discuss, Because right now you are twisting yourself into a pretzel tryin go to spin your way out of it.
Reposting portions of the OP is not making making your case for what you wish to discuss. Stop being a ****** and go on record in your own words.
How does that involve you, Cowardly Runny?
*Huey » 18 Jun 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Next time, in the OP, make it very clear what you wish to discuss, Because right now you are twisting yourself into a pretzel tryin go to spin your way out of it.
Reposting portions of the OP is not making making your case for what you wish to discuss. Stop being a ****** and go on record in your own words.
You ain't the brightest rock in the box, are you? LMAO!