No, Cucky...*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ Damn, did you lie this much to the wife that ran away so fast she leather daughter with you?
*Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ MANY grounds. It's a 31 page petition, DICKSUCK!!
You MIGHT want to read it before you spout off some drivel and nonsense you can't even remotely understand what you're saying.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑No, Cucky...*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ Damn, did you lie this much to the wife that ran away so fast she leather daughter with you?
No leather....
You were off the forum for a while.....others were curious why I wasn't curbstomping you in absentia.....
I said it would not be sporting.....as unworthy of concern as you are.
You saw the post after you returned, and insisted I had to come down to Lilliput Circle for pasta.....
I explained that I am carb averse.....this set you off....
That, and my insistence that you arrive at any such encounter chaperoned by your spouse.
The rest is narrative.
No...that's the truth.*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ lmao! That’s a retelling fro the ages,
Dude, you have issued threats, some veiled, since Aug of 2017.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ No...that's the truth.
I've explained the consequences of you yapping in my presence..
But you persist.
Don't let Coozie catch you doing that..RebelGator » 19 Jun 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ What was the disposition of the 39 earlier rape accusations......Flounder?
No...*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
There are no consequences for yapping in your presence. You are an anonymous KeyBoard Komando never was. Your stories are entertaining.
*Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ Hey @Cannonpointer , did you read where BV now thinks he is the BOSS around here and can DEMAND that "you get no questions"??
But the REALITY IS, you can ask this **** PIECE OF **** a million questions and you GET NO ANSWERS!!
You're a JOKE of a "human being" @Blackvegetable
@ROG62 @Vegas @RebelGator @*Huey
Vegas » 17 Jun 2025, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable Only one of two options will end this demoralization.
Option A: Answer it as A< B< C< or D, then I will expect you to defend your choice as to remove the possibility of guesswork.
Option B: Finally acknowledge the truth - that you still have no clue what Survivorship Bias is.
I personally don't give a **** which option you choose, because either option proves you are a moron. Even if you do choose the correct answer, you still have to defend it. You won't be able to.
Of course not. In order to do that you would have to leave the Binky in the Duplex, give your name and a pic.You won't get that close.
*Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑
So what DICKSUCK??
How about telling us how the JURY FOUND NO RAPE HAPPENED??
When you CONFESS THAT, we can move forward.
Until then GO EAT ****!How about telling us how the JURY FOUND NO RAPE HAPPENED??
Looks like he just did.How about telling us how the JURY FOUND NO RAPE HAPPENED??
To whom?
You don't recognize it?*Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Is this your CONFESSION that NO RAPE HAPPENED?? @Blackvegetable
Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑To whom?
Tell me what you think you are looking at, Neverrun.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ You don't recognize it?
It's the petition you didn't know about, and never read.
Because it is noted at the very top of the page....even before you get to the table of content....where it is repeated.*Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** IDIOT!!
How the hell did I know it was 31 pages if I hadn't READ IT!!
From your source:Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Because it is noted at the very top of the page....even before you get to the table of content....where it is repeated.
That's my guess, anyway.
You're a **** moron, Fondler.
To what source are you referring?*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ From your source:
THE JURY FOUND THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT RAPED BY DEFENDANT