Liberal Forum

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm

I also went to page 3.  You have provided more documentation that the jury DID NOT find him liable for rape.

This is the diversion you create to avoid making a case.  It is your thread so let's see how long it takes you.

Like talking to very stupid moss.

Post the date of the document.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:35 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:29 pm

The name of the law firm that wote it and on whose behalf is also on the first page.

Acknoweldege you were answered.

I wasn't answered...

Do you understand the significance of that in the context of the "fact" asserted?
 

 

Tell you what.  I will answer in more detail when you answer the following:

1.  Does the Colt Sporter appear on the Civilian or Military list of firearms?

2,  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

Here are the lists:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

I have already done the hard work for you.  You can resume thing about questions when you answer those.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm

Like talking to very stupid moss.

Post the date of the document.

No need.  You claim to have read it so you know the date of that one.  How about you post it as part of your stand?

You gotta do something first if you wish for me to do it.

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:38 pm

Tell you what.  I will answer in more detail when you answer the following:

It doesn't require detail.

Only the answer.

And, as shown, it is critical that you provide it the first time.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:41 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:38 pm

Tell you what.  I will answer in more detail when you answer the following:

It doesn't require detail.

Only the answer.

And, as shown, it is critical that you provide it the first time.

 

 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:38 pm

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:35 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:29 pm

The name of the law firm that wote it and on whose behalf is also on the first page.

Acknoweldege you were answered.

I wasn't answered...

Do you understand the significance of that in the context of the "fact" asserted?
 


 

Tell you what.  I will answer in more detail when you answer the following:

1.  Does the Colt Sporter appear on the Civilian or Military list of firearms?

2,  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

Here are the lists:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

I have already done the hard work for you.  You can resume thing about questions when you answer those.

 

You are not going to be until I am answered.  Nod.  So stop whining.  Is this why your dad allowed your mom to have custody?  You were a whiny bitch? LMAO!


 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:40 pm

No need.  You claim to have read it so you know the date of that one.  How about you post it as part of your stand?

You gotta do something first if you wish for me to do it.

There is a need, even if you don't understand it 

You gotta do something first 

Is answering all of my questions to this point not enough?

The evidence is overwhelming that you gotta just answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:43 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:40 pm

No need.  You claim to have read it so you know the date of that one.  How about you post it as part of your stand?

You gotta do something first if you wish for me to do it.

There is a need, even if you don't understand it 

You gotta do something first 

Is answering all of my questions to this point not enough?

The evidence is overwhelming that you gotta just answer the question. 

 

Nope, that's not it.  

The evidence is overwhelming that you have not read the document.

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:43 pm

You are not going to be until I am answered.  Nod.  So stop whining.  Is this why your dad allowed your mom to have custody?  You were a whiny bitch? LMAO!

Tiny, 

Go back to the recitation of facts.

I've answered every one of my own questions.

You've answered none.

Is this why your dad allowed your mom to have custody?  You were a whiny bitch? LMAO!

Temperature's risin.....

 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:46 pm

Nope, that's not it.  

The evidence is overwhelming that you have not read the document.

Were that true, you would answer the questions. 

But you run.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:47 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:43 pm

You are not going to be until I am answered.  Nod.  So stop whining.  Is this why your dad allowed your mom to have custody?  You were a whiny bitch? LMAO!

Tiny, 

Go back to the recitation of facts.

I've answered every one of my own questions.

You've answered none.

Is this why your dad allowed your mom to have custody?  You were a whiny bitch? LMAO!

Temperature's risin.....

 

 

Yeah, your is.  You know what you gotta do. You have two questions that are 9 months old. Until you take care of that I am not answering any of yours. It would behoove you to just make your case.

At the moment we have you providing proof that no jury has found Trump liable for rape.  As the motion I posted, and you posted a screen shot of, factually says.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:48 pm

Were that true, you would answer the questions. 

But you run.

Sounds a lot like a PhD guy I know.         

Now show some respect for yer Daddy...     

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/33vHtsAdQ_Q
 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:48 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:46 pm

Nope, that's not it.  

The evidence is overwhelming that you have not read the document.

Were that true, you would answer the questions. 

But you run.
 

 

Cool, tell us all about page 3 then.  ;)

I don't need to answer any questions.  All the answers are in the information I provided.  Before I post them you have 9 month old questions to answer.  

Ya see, years ago we had a discussion where you asked a question, I answered, and I asked you a question.  Which you would not answer.  When this was pointed out to you you said you would answer questions after all of yours were answered.  At the time I did not know what a dishonest prick you are so I agreed.  After you were done you run like a whiny bitch and never answered a single question.

You know what you gotta do.

What list does the Colt Sporter appear on and when was it standard combat issue?

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm

Yeah, your is.  You know what you gotta do. You have two questions that are 9 months old. Until you take care of that I am not answering any of yours. It would behoove you to just make your case.

At the moment we have you providing proof that no jury has found Trump liable for rape.  As the motion I posted, and you posted a screen shot of, factually says.

I have no questions to answer.

Your "challenge" has been REPEATEDLY debunked, in detail.

You refuse to answer questions about that citation as well.

At the moment we have you providing proof that no jury has found 

where?

answer questions the first time.


Or, just meltdown...another **** day for you.

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm

Cool, tell us all about page 3 then.  

I don't need to answer any questions.  All the answers are in the information I provided.  Before I post them you have 9 month old questions to answer.  

Ya see, years ago we had a discussion where you asked a question, I answered, and I asked you a question.  Which you would not answer.  When this was pointed out to you you said you would answer questions after all of yours were answered.  At the time I did not know what a dishonest prick you are so I agreed.  After you were done you run like a whiny bitch and never answered a single question.

You know what you gotta do.

What list does the Colt Sporter appear on and when was it standard combat issue?

Page 3 of what?

Don't be vague...
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:03 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm

Yeah, your is.  You know what you gotta do. You have two questions that are 9 months old. Until you take care of that I am not answering any of yours. It would behoove you to just make your case.

At the moment we have you providing proof that no jury has found Trump liable for rape.  As the motion I posted, and you posted a screen shot of, factually says.

I have no questions to answer.

Your "challenge" has been REPEATEDLY debunked, in detail.

You refuse to answer questions about that citation as well.

At the moment we have you providing proof that no jury has found

where?

answer questions the first time.

Or, just meltdown...another **** day for you.

LMAO!  No idiot you have not.  All you have to do is honestly answer those questions and you win.  Well, not really.  You will lose and that is what you are a ****** and won't answer them.  So I recommend that until you find your balls and answer that challenge, I REFUSE to answer any of your questions.  So start making a case.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm

Cool, tell us all about page 3 then.  

I don't need to answer any questions.  All the answers are in the information I provided.  Before I post them you have 9 month old questions to answer.  

Ya see, years ago we had a discussion where you asked a question, I answered, and I asked you a question.  Which you would not answer.  When this was pointed out to you you said you would answer questions after all of yours were answered.  At the time I did not know what a dishonest prick you are so I agreed.  After you were done you run like a whiny bitch and never answered a single question.

You know what you gotta do.

What list does the Colt Sporter appear on and when was it standard combat issue?

Page 3 of what?

Don't be vague...

The document you took a screen shot of and which I posted the link.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-conte ... l-memo.pdf
 
 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:08 pm

LMAO!  No idiotic has not.  All you have to do is honestly answer those questions and you win.  Well, not really.  You will lose and that is what you are a ****** and won't answer them.  So I recommend that until you find your balls and answer that challenge, I REFUSE to answer any of your questions.  So start making a case.

The document you took a screen shot of and which I posted the link.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-conte ... l-memo.pdf

Watch me crush...

Does the citation to which you refer begin as follows?

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:08 pm

LMAO!  No idiotic has not.  All you have to do is honestly answer those questions and you win.  Well, not really.  You will lose and that is what you are a ****** and won't answer them.  So I recommend that until you find your balls and answer that challenge, I REFUSE to answer any of your questions.  So start making a case.

The document you took a screen shot of and which I posted the link.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-conte ... l-memo.pdf

Watch me crush...

Does the citation to which you refer begin as follows?

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
 

 

Sorry, that is not the answer.  Stop whiny, lil bitch, that others don't answer questions until you start answering yourself.

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm

Sorry, that is not the answer.  Stop whiny, lil bitch, that others don't answer questions until you start answering yourself.

Yes, it is.

We know, because you run from it.

If not, answer.

If you don't, you concede defeat again.

 
 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm

Sorry, that is not the answer.  Stop whiny, lil bitch, that others don't answer questions until you start answering yourself.

Stop whiny, lil bitch, that others don't answer questions

You don't 

until you start answering yourself.

I do...even my own.

Lying Quimmie 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 2:18 pm

Sorry, that is not the answer.  Stop whiny, lil bitch, that others don't answer questions until you start answering yourself.

Yes, it is.

We know, because you run from it.

If not, answer.

If you don't, you concede defear again.


 

 

That is another case of your ****** *** answering a question with a question.  

I don't know what defear is.  

You conceded when you ran from the questions.  Here I will once again give you the answers BUT before I answer questions from you YOU need to post these as your words.

The answers are the Semi Auto SPorter is on the civilian list, not the military.  The Semi Auto Sporter was NEVER military issue for the battlefield.

Your turn.  As soon as you post those as the answers to the questions we may resume.  While those questions remain unanswered I refuse to answer any of yours.  Because you are a ******.