Yes, child.Cannonpointer » 19 Jun 2025, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑ You think refusing to do your job is "pouting"?
You're a special case, child.
I am not a child, so don't even think about trying to groom me, fruity.
I could have you violently express groomed for a 6pack of Tecate and a bag of TakisCannonpointer » 19 Jun 2025, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not a child, so don't even think about trying to groom me, fruity.
I'm just going to ask you to very quickly not be a ***.Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I could have you violently express groomed for a 6pack of Tecate and a bag of Takis
Sorry, hard wired like that...Cannonpointer » 19 Jun 2025, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm just going to ask you to very quickly not be a ***.
Hurry.
Sounds like you're trying some grooming, homo.Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, hard wired like that...
Thus is Ernesto....he will be your guide for the next 72 hrs.
Ernesto speaks no English.Cannonpointer » 19 Jun 2025, 10:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Sounds like you're trying some grooming, homo.
Stay away from the no zones.
Post my lie.*Beekeeper » 20 Jun 2025, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑ LYING like you do is no reason??
YOU'RE A **** IDIOT!!
But then again, you are a LWNJ, so we should expect nothing less.
Now, UNTIL YOU DO REPENT AND CONFESS, YOU DON'T NEED TO ASK ANYMORE QUESTIONS OF ANYONE. You'll get NOTHING, DICKSUCK!!
PERIOD!!
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
NO FINDING OF RAPE, ASSHOLE!!Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
*Beekeeper » 20 Jun 2025, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, and just so you know why that means JACK ****....
The COURT MUST USE THE LEGAL DEFINTION OF RAPE, not the "public opinion" of what it means, ASSHOLE!!
Sucks for you and Kaplan that the LAW SAYS THAT IS WHAT MUST BE USED!! So that in and of itself is MORE than enough for the SCOTUS to rule that KAPLAN IS A **** IDIOT!!
And if that "ruling" is the case, explain why Trump has now won 2 lawsuits where "Trump is a rapist" was claimed as "fact"!! YOUR BOY StephyPOOPolous **** AROUND AND FOUND OUT and trust me, YOU KEEP LYING AND YOU WILL TOO, ASSWIPER!!
https://i.postimg.cc/5yT7qRgK/Trump-Pre ... inting.jpg
Fondler,Oh, and just so you know why that means JACK ****....
No, the jury isn't so bound.The COURT MUST USE THE LEGAL DEFINTION OF RAPE, not the "public opinion" of what it means, ASSHOLE!!
He's a judge....you're a moron.Sucks for you and Kaplan
Even though I could run you down in half a block, I'm not gonna chase you.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Even though I could run you down in half a block, I'm not gonna chase you.
Had there been cars, you surely would have showed me.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Had there been cars, you surely would have showed me.
There are several public sources for my identity.*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t worry about you. You are too concerned about your identity going public.