Don't tag @*HooooeyVagina.....it upsets him.*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ But MUST CONFESS...
YOU ARE THE DUMBEST **** IDIOT I HAVE EVER ENCOUNTERED.
Ever.
@ROG62 @RebelGator @Cannonpointer @Vegas @*Huey
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
Time for your confession.*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ NO, YOU tagging Huey upsets him.
ANYONE ON HIS SIDE he loves.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Time for your confession.
Nose to the dirt.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .184.0.pdf
We're done here, Fondler.*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I DO confess that 90%+ of the ARGUMENTS in this petition were NEVER ADDRESSED in Kaplan's "ruling".
Obviously YOU...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom https://apnews.com/article/trump-e-jean ... fb17750f48*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I DO confess that 90%+ of the ARGUMENTS in this petition were NEVER ADDRESSED in Kaplan's "ruling".
NOW, YOUR TURN TO CONFESS THAT TRUMP IS NOT A RAPIST AND HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND TO BE ONE BY ANY JURY!!
Go!!
There are retards like you on both sides of the aisle.
There is no reasonable argument, it was a retarded policy shift. I’m glad they walked it back,Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ You are clearly missing the point (which should have been suggested by the title, bold text, and statement). Yet you insist on framing my argument.
Why don't you instead frame a reasoned argument for the original policy and subsequent flip flops?
Why don't you instead frame a reasoned argument for the original policy and subsequent flip flops?Cedar » 17 Jun 2025, 11:07 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no reasonable argument, it was a retarded policy shift. I’m glad they walked it back,
CheddyRube, please...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... ry-groups/*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ No need. The policy has been reversed. Don’t bother with the link. Thread fail.
https://www.axios.com/2025/06/17/trump- ... tion-raids
The pause on workplace raids in agriculture and hospitality went out hours after Trump said in a post Thursday on his social media platform, Truth Social, that he was sympathetic to concerns that executives raised about his deportation plan. Trump wrote last week that “changes are coming” to help “protect our Farmers” from losing workers. However, a White House official told The Washington Post at the time that no actual policy changes were proposed by the White House.Cedar » 17 Jun 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ You’re a day late, dollar short, that policy was walked back yesterday, Moran.
**chuckle**