Liberal Forum

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. 

The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration’s anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... er-vehicle


No skin off his teeth - Grifty can't drive.

And there's no tariff on bribes meme coins...

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. 

The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration’s anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... er-vehicle


No skin off his teeth - Grifty can't drive.

And there's no tariff on bribes meme coins...

Nothing new. Always the bottom of the totem pole chain of command systems contextual social order is created by rule of law that support all the top down leaderships governing time inside out by ancestors living outside in since arriving a fertilized cell so far.

First arrived always controls last generation arriving in relative time theory now isn't self evident life adapting in series parallel positions as displaced ancestrally here so far.

Doesn't change by faith in God or political science beliefs humans are exempt from the natural order of living forward now, one at a time each existing as part of the whole process accomplished here as evolving in plain sight specifically uniquely present by ancestral lineage and generation gap of sibling or only child these generation gaps present.

For most people, buying a new car is a poor financial move.

Immediate depreciation
Higher insurance rates
Higher registration fees and taxes
Higher repair costs
Higher interest rates for sub prime loans.

Then people wonder why they don't have enough money for retirement.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. 

The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration’s anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... er-vehicle

No skin off his teeth - Grifty can't drive.

And there's no tariff on bribes meme coins...

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. 

The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration’s anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... er-vehicle

No skin off his teeth - Grifty can't drive.

And there's no tariff on bribes meme coins...

Are these guys related to yer PhDs on LSD?    Will yer prediction be off by a light-year again?     
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. 

The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration’s anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... er-vehicle

No skin off his teeth - Grifty can't drive.

And there's no tariff on bribes meme coins...

Has anyone yet asked this **** why he didn't once mention prices of anything thru Biden's regime? 

SouthernFried » 19 Jun 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 10:44 am

Has anyone yet asked this **** why he didn't once mention prices of anything thru Biden's regime?

@Deezer Shoove  's gonna **** a brick.

Fuelman » 19 Jun 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 9:41 am

For most people, buying a new car is a poor financial move.

Immediate depreciation
Higher insurance rates
Higher registration fees and taxes
Higher repair costs
Higher interest rates for sub prime loans.

Then people wonder why they don't have enough money for retirement.

So I'm actually shopping now, and I won't pay for the massive depreciation in the first 3 years...

But you must believe used car dralers are idiots if you think they won't raise prices in response.


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 10:58 am

@Deezer Shoove  's gonna **** a brick.

Bv humped his leg, then voted for him.      

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcQTgw4snNw
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 10:58 am

 

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:03 am

Fuelman » 19 Jun 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 9:41 am

For most people, buying a new car is a poor financial move.

Immediate depreciation
Higher insurance rates
Higher registration fees and taxes
Higher repair costs
Higher interest rates for sub prime loans.

Then people wonder why they don't have enough money for retirement.

So I'm actually shopping now, and I won't pay for the massive depreciation in the first 3 years...

But you must believe used car dralers are idiots if you think they won't raise prices in response.


 

 

Used car prices have been rising for a few years.  Google it

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:05 am

Used car prices have been rising for a few years.  Google it

Let's keep this very brief..

When was the last time you looked at a "pricing history" report on a specific vehicle?

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 6:09 am

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. 

The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration’s anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... er-vehicle

No skin off his teeth - Grifty can't drive.

And there's no tariff on bribes meme coins...

There's but ONE teeny tiny little problem with your ****, ASSHOLE!!

Car prices HAVE NOT GONE UP due to tariffs!!

Despite two months of tariffs, car prices aren’t going up. Is now the time to buy? | CNN Business

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:09 am

Let's keep this very brief..

When was the last time you looked at a "pricing history" report on a specific vehicle?

That's a question.  Try again.

The price of used cars have been going up since COVID.  Prove me wrong.  

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:13 am

That's a question.  Try again.

The price of used cars have been going up since COVID.  Prove me wrong.

yes, coward..

The price of used cars have been going up since COVID.  Prove me wrong.

Not that it has anything to do with what I'm talking about...


https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1JHRm


Acknowledge that you've been proven wrong.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:24 am

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:13 am

That's a question.  Try again.

The price of used cars have been going up since COVID.  Prove me wrong.

yes, coward..

The price of used cars have been going up since COVID.  Prove me wrong.

Not that it has anything to do with what I'm talking about...


https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1JHRm


Acknowledge that you've been proven wrong.

 

https://www.cbtnews.com/used-car-prices ... port-says/

At your link look at Jul 2020 and Jan 2025.  2025 is much higher than Jul 2020.  

Thank you for proving my point.  Nd remember, that number was 6 months ago, idiot.
 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:30 am

https://www.cbtnews.com/used-car-prices ... port-says/

At your link look at Jul 2020 and Jan 2025.  2025 is much higher than Jul 2020.  

Thank you for proving my point.  Nd remember, that number was 6 months ago, idiot.

Stop wasting time..

Acknowledge that you've been proven wrong.

At your link look at Jul 2020 and Jan 2025.  2025 is much higher than Jul 2020.  

Where is the index relative to Feb 2022?

remember, that number was 6 months ago, idiot.

May 2025: 183.779 | Index 1982-1984=100, Seasonally Adjusted | Monthly Updated: Jun 11, 2025 7:41 AM CDT
  Next Release Date: Jul 15, 2025


Don't yap.

Do as you're told.


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:37 am

Stop wasting time..

Acknowledge that you've been proven wrong.

Where is the index relative to Feb 2022?

May 2025: 183.779 | Index 1982-1984=100, Seasonally Adjusted | Monthly Updated: Jun 11, 2025 7:41 AM CDT
  Next Release Date: Jul 15, 2025

Don't yap.

Do as you're told.

I haven’t been proven wrong.  You solidified my point.  I thank you for that.
 

*Huey » 19 Jun 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:40 am

I haven’t been proven wrong.  You solidified my point.  I thank you for that.

You are, once again, demonstrably wrong.


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2025, 11:41 am

You are, once again, demonstrably wrong.

Again, prices are higher by about 5 grand and some predict that to go higher.  You can’t even read your own info.