Liberal Forum

Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb Iran...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8hEtI9AI0U

michaelf » 20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm

Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb Iran...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8hEtI9AI0U

45 years later - that song was prophetic. 
 

michaelf » 20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm

Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb Iran...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8hEtI9AI0U

 

All I think we should bomb is the nuke sites.  No need for an all out war.  

Israel has them deaf and blind. Now is the time to finish them. They deserve everything they get for causing terror and taking hostages.

michaelf » 20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm

Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb Iran...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8hEtI9AI0U

I saw your name on the thread, I bet myself it was some *** anti-muslim ****. 

Meanwhile, jews own your soul. 
 

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm

All I think we should bomb is the nuke sites.  No need for an all out war.

What nuke sites would those be?

The IAEA was given full access. 100% full access. That was the deal Obama made. 

Bibi cried that Iran would have a bomb in one decade. I thought to myself, "But bibi - you were sniveling that they would have one in two weeks. Isn't ten years an improvement?"

Then Trump killed the deal and told Iran it was okay - no need to let the IAEA inspect. Business as usual.

And now you say we need to bomb? Why? To stop what Obama had ALREADY stopped? 

Have you been to Iran, and seen these nuke sites? Do you know for a fact these sites exist? Or do you just trust the fake news on this one?

Truly, I would LOVE know how you do this. How do you determine that on THIS one, the folks that tell you there are seven hundred genders are telling the truth?

"Yeah, sure, they lied to me 80 times last week alone. But they have a tell. When they're not lying, they move their head this-a-way." Is that the deal? They have a tell? What's your secret? You're ready to BOMB A COUNTRY, which is an act of war. And you're willing based on some news that you believed. Who told you that news, and why did you trust them enough to commit acts of war?
 
 
 

PhiloBeddo » 20 Jun 2025, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 5:44 pm

Israel has them deaf and blind. Now is the time to finish them. They deserve everything they get for causing terror and taking hostages.

What hostages are you talking about, you Frank Burns ***?

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 8:15 pm

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm

All I think we should bomb is the nuke sites.  No need for an all out war.

What nuke sites would those be?

The IAEA was given full access. 100% full access. That was the deal Obama made. 

Bibi cried that Iran would have a bomb in one decade. I thought to myself, "But bibi - you were sniveling that they would have one in two weeks. Isn't ten years an improvement?"

Then Trump killed the deal and told Iran it was okay - no need to let the IAEA inspect. Business as usual.

And now you say we need to bomb? Why? To stop what Obama had ALREADY stopped? 

Have you been to Iran, and seen these nuke sites? Do you know for a fact these sites exist? Or do you just trust the fake news on this one?

Truly, I would LOVE know how you do this. How do you determine that on THIS one, the folks that tell you there are seven hundred genders are telling the truth?

"Yeah, sure, they lied to me 80 times last week alone. But they have a tell. When they're not lying, they move their head this-a-way." Is that the deal? They have a tell? What's your secret? You're ready to BOMB A COUNTRY, which is an act of war. And you're willing based on some news that you believed. Who told you that news, and why did you trust them enough to commit acts of war?
 
 
 

 

https://financialpost.com/pmn/business- ... chdog-says

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:24 am

https://financialpost.com/pmn/business- ... chdog-says

Sweet Jesus, son. I am just going to declare you 100%, irreversibly Irony-Immune. 

Here is the actual HEADLINE from your hastily googled excuse to beat the war drums:

"The United Nations nuclear watchdog said the location of Iran’s near-bomb-grade stockpile of enriched uranium cannot currently be verified, as Israel’s ongoing military assault is preventing inspectors from doing their work."

What's the answer to "We lost it cus a the bombing"???

MORE **** BOMBING - THAT'LL FIND IT!!!

Mind you, it isn't declared missing. Or moved. JUST NOT VERIFIED, BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT THEIR INSPECTORS MURDERED. And your irony meter just sits uselessly at zero with your T levels.

Just throw up your hands on this whole thinking thing. It gives ya headaches and gets ya in trouble. How many times have we been down this road? You, couching neoconservative jingosim and bomb happy mnetrosexuality in "reasonableness" - not unlike your "reasonable" defenses of nanny state torture chambers back in the day. "We just need to bomb until we find the stuff that we lost track of because of the bombing."
 

Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:47 am

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:24 am

https://financialpost.com/pmn/business- ... chdog-says

Sweet Jesus, son. I am just going to declare you 100%, irreversibly Irony-Immune. 

Here is the actual HEADLINE from your hastily googled excuse to beat the war drums:

"The United Nations nuclear watchdog said the location of Iran’s near-bomb-grade stockpile of enriched uranium cannot currently be verified, as Israel’s ongoing military assault is preventing inspectors from doing their work."

What's the answer to "We lost it cus a the bombing"???

MORE **** BOMBING - THAT'LL FIND IT!!!

Mind you, it isn't declared missing. Or moved. JUST NOT VERIFIED, BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT THEIR INSPECTORS MURDERED. And your irony meter just sits uselessly at zero with your T levels.

Just throw up your hands on this whole thinking thing. It gives ya headaches and gets ya in trouble. How many times have we been down this road? You, couching neoconservative jingosim and bomb happy mnetrosexuality in "reasonableness" - not unlike your "reasonable" defenses of nanny state torture chambers back in the day. "We just need to bomb until we find the stuff that we lost track of because of the bombing."
 

 

Sweet Jesus Old Man, I don't want war.  That s pretty clear with my original post. We accuse the forums most prolific poster of not having critical thinking skills.  Iran sure has a lot of enriched uranium for a country NOT making a bomb.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:49 am

Sweet Jesus Old Man, I don't want war.  That s pretty clear with my original post. We accuse the forums most prolific poster of not having critical thinking skills.  Iran sure has a lot of enriched uranium for a country NOT making a bomb.

No no - not YOU. You just wanna drop LIMITED bombs - not enough to start a war.

How many bombs over Austin would it take - ballpark?

Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:51 am

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:49 am

Sweet Jesus Old Man, I don't want war.  That s pretty clear with my original post. We accuse the forums most prolific poster of not having critical thinking skills.  Iran sure has a lot of enriched uranium for a country NOT making a bomb.

No no - not YOU. You just wanna drop LIMITED bombs - not enough to start a war.

How many bombs over Austin would it take - ballpark?

 

If Iran had the capability to bomb us the would have already.

Now, back to those critical thinking skills.  In order for Iran to bomb Austin they would need ICBMs.  So you think they gave them.  And they also have, according to the UN, enough enriched uranium to create 10 nuclear bombs.

But, your argument is they aren't making any.  Not a chance I am willing to take.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

If Iran had the capability to bomb us the would have already.

Said the folks that gave you the covid shot.

Stay stupid, my firend.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

Now, back to those critical thinking skills.  In order for Iran to bomb Austin they would need ICBMs.  So you think they gave them.  And they also have, according to the UN, enough enriched uranium to create 10 nuclear bombs.

I said nothing about Iran bombing Austin. How many bombs could mexico drop, or argentina? I'm just looking for a REASONABLE number of bombs that don't start a war.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

But, your argument is they aren't making any.  Not a chance I am willing to take.

I would never ask you to take any chances, child. We meed to bomb everyone who might maybe someday could. And yellow cake and stuff.If kept Iraq from nuking us - and they were TWO WEEKS AWAY!!!!

Who we REALLY need to bomb is North Korea. If they had the capability to bomb us, they would have already.

Right?
 

Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

If Iran had the capability to bomb us the would have already.

Now, back to those critical thinking skills.  In order for Iran to bomb Austin they would need ICBMs.  So you think they gave them.  And they also have, according to the UN, enough enriched uranium to create 10 nuclear bombs.

But, your argument is they aren't making any.  Not a chance I am willing to take.

I don't think you have a **** clue what your words mean. I seriously do not. 

A nation whose Supreme Leader can bomb another soveriegn nation without even bothering to consult the legislature is a dictatorship. Trump did that. You are defending dictatorship. And you can run all the **** and claptrap google will give you, but you know for a fact that the founders did not intend a dictatorship, and you know for a fact that a nation whose Supreme Leader can declare war without the Congress is a dictatorship, and you know for a fact that DROPPING **** BOMBS is a pretty hard to ignore declaration of war. 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 11:26 am

I don't think you have a **** clue what your words mean. I seriously do not. 

A nation whose Supreme Leader can bomb another soveriegn nation without even bothering to consult the legislature is a dictatorship. Trump did that. You are defending dictatorship. And you can run all the **** and claptrap google will give you, but you know for a fact that the founders did not intend a dictatorship, and you know for a fact that a nation whose Supreme Leader can declare war without the Congress is a dictatorship, and you know for a fact that DROPPING **** BOMBS is a pretty hard to ignore declaration of war.

You mean like Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc?  
 

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:31 pm

You mean like Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc?

I ABSOLUTELY mean that. Ya see, my principles are not dependent on who is in the WH, whether I voted for them, etc.

And I am enough of a purist not to be mollified by legalisms. "Oh, president obama was acting on this use of force authorization from ten years ago that used the word terrorism, because this bomb he dropped could conceivably have accidentally landed on a terrorist, so he had congressional consent by polish proxy..."

But SINCE YOU BROUGHT THOSE GUYS UP...

Let us compare and contrast, shall we?

Can you give me an example of any of those guys just dropping **** bombs on a foreign nation - a de facto declaration of war - without even CONSULTING the congress? 

And do you have any response to my fact statement that the ability to declare war rests with the Congress, and Trump usurped the power to declare war when he bombed Iran?

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm

I ABSOLUTELY mean that. Ya see, my principles are not dependent on who is in the WH, whether I voted for them, etc.

And I am enough of a purist not to be mollified by legalisms. "Oh, president obama was acting on this use of force authorization from ten years ago that used the word terrorism, because this bomb he dropped could conceivably have accidentally landed on a terrorist, so he had congressional consent by polish proxy..."

But SINCE YOU BROUGHT THOSE GUYS UP...

Let us compare and contrast, shall we?

Can you give me an example of any of those guys just dropping **** bombs on a foreign nation - a de facto declaration of war - without even CONSULTING the congress? 

And do you have any response to my fact statement that the ability to declare war rests with the Congress, and Trump usurped the power to declare war when he bombed Iran?

here is the problem.  MY PRINCIPLES on this matter also are not dependent on who is in the WH.

michaelf » 20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 12:44 pm

Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb Iran...

 

BOMB BOMB BOMB ...BOMB BOMB  IRAN...https://youtu.be/gC4R9aBYqGo?si=JtuzKhxzUpCaGsN9

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:44 pm

here is the problem.  MY PRINCIPLES on this matter also are not dependent on who is in the WH.

I don't understand. Why is that a problem?
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm

I don't understand. Why is that a problem?

Nope.  We disagree on use of the War Powers Resolution.