That was brief...
Try reading the citation, moron.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ The 5.56×45mm NATO(official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO, commonly pronounced "five-five-six") is a rimless bottlenecked centerfireintermediate cartridge family developed in the late 1970s in Belgium by FN Herstal.[5] It consists of the SS109, L110, and SS111 cartridges.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56×45mm ... cartridges.
STFU about **** you know nothing about,
viewtopic.php?p=2762368#p2762368
Adios!where's the evidence for this?They are not high powered firearms
Weapon v. Round.*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ Try reading the citation, moron.
The 5.56×45mm NATO(official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO, commonly pronounced "five-five-six") is a rimless bottlenecked centerfireintermediate cartridge family developed in the late 1970s in Belgium by FN Herstal.[5] It consists of the SS109, L110, and SS111 cartridges.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56×45mm ... cartridges.
STFU about **** you know nothing about,
viewtopic.php?p=2762368#p2762368
Adios!
I did articulate. All we have from you is your "that is ****" comment. I articulated my stand (case) and used citations to back it up. YOU show us where the 5.56 is not an intermediate powered cartridge. Weapon v Round is ****.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ Weapon v. Round.
Tiny,
Repost your "cotton comments"..
You don't have a case, because you don't have the balls to articulate it.
*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I did articulate. All we have from you is your "that is ****" comment. I articulated my stand (case) and used citations to back it up. YOU show us where the 5.56 is not an intermediate powered cartridge. Weapon v Round is ****.
Weapons are only as good as the ammo used, twit.
Weapons are only as good as the ammo used, twit.
My case is closed.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ You're inching closer to the **** case you don't have the balls to articulate..
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ You're inching closer to the **** case you don't have the balls to articulate..
What "case" does this support?*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ But wait...there's more.
Some states and counties ban the use of 223.5.56 for hunting deer because the round is not powerful. The concern is the deer will be simply wounded. Illegal WeaponsNumber one, knowing what weapons can and cannot be used when hunting. In Virginia, it is illegal to use a centerfire rifle or pistol with a caliber smaller than .23 to hunt deer. Why is this an issue? Many new hunters think they can use a very popular .223 or 5.56 caliber weapon to hunt. Unfortunately, because these rounds are under the crucial .23 caliber mark, they are illegal weapons to hunt deer in Virginia. Be sure to verify the law for individual counties. Ensure they have no other specific regulations that may affect your hunting. Be familiar with and know the laws in the area you plan to hunt.
https://www.uslawshield.com/virginia-de ... ng-season/
You have no idea what a case is.*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ My case is closed.
Waiting on yours. Post some source that classifies the 5.56 NATO round as not an intermediate charge.
Don't give me that Weapon v Round **** again. Now you are just pulling **** out of your flabby ***.
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ What "case" does this support?
I can think of several.
The grain, size, fps, all are part of determining whether a cartridge if fully powered or not.
Packaged ideology people follow hook line, and sinker. Franchised realities saving humanity's concepts of better 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year dawn to dusk 2 days intellectually counted exist in the same rotation of the planet 24/7.
Tiny,*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ The grain, size, fps, all are part of determining whether a cartridge if fully powered or not.
Still waiting on you.
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
We KNOW the cartridge was designed for combat.
It's about the weapon.
*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ The power of the round it fires determines whether a weapon is fully or intermediate powered.
Waiting on your linked citations.
where is the linked citation to this?The power of the round it fires determines whether a weapon is fully or intermediate powered
Tiny,Waiting on your linked citations.
Unless it says 5.56 NATO is fully powered I have no need, ROTC Rambo.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ where is the linked citation to this?
Tiny,
Watch the video, starting at 27:00.
It SHOWS you.
That assertion needs a citation.*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Unless it says 5.56 NATO is fully powered I have no need, ROTC Rambo.
Tiny,*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ You have one that says 5.56 is an intermediate cartridge. In response to your troll of me the other day.
I'm good. I am just stringing you along so the others see what an ignorant asshole you are.