Liberal Forum

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 8:42 am

I'm good.  I am just stringing you along so the others see what an ignorant asshole you are.

Does the fact that the charge is intermediate make the weapon firing it more suitable for civilian use?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 8:53 am

Does the fact that the charge is intermediate make the weapon firing it more suitable for civilian use?

I don't see a case from you yet proving the 5.56 NATO round is not an intermediate charged cartridge.  There are far more powerful rifles out there for civilians.  Hell, as I said and shown, there are some states and localities that ban the use of 5.56/223 for deer hunting because the round is not relatively not that powerful and may deliver a clean kill.   

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:00 am

I don't see a case from you yet 

Weapon v. Cartridge 



Do you dispute that the NATO 5.56 round was developed for combat?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:06 am

Weapon v. Cartridge 

Do you dispute that the NATO 5.56 round was developed for combat?
 

So was 9mm.  So what?
 

Skans » 26 Jun 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:11 am

So was 9mm.  So what?

Thank you.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:06 am

Weapon v. Cartridge 



Do you dispute that the NATO 5.56 round was developed for combat?

 

I don't see a case from you yet proving the 5.56 NATO round is not an intermediate charged cartridge.  There are far more powerful rifles out there for civilians.  Hell, as I said and shown, there are some states and localities that ban the use of 5.56/223 for deer hunting because the round is not relatively not that powerful and may deliver a clean kill.   

Skans » 26 Jun 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:11 am

So was 9mm.  So what?
 

 

45 ACP was developed for combat.  So what?
45 Long was developed for combat.  So what?
7.62 was developed for combat.  So what?
.308 was developed for combat.  So what?

ANd tell us why big game hunters do not use a small, intermediate round like .223/5.56 NATO.

 

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:35 am

45 ACP was developed for combat.  So what?
45 Long was developed for combat.  So what?
7.62 was developed for combat.  So what?
.308 was developed for combat.  So what?

ANd tell us why big game hunters do not use a small, intermediate round like .223/5.56 NATO.

The 5.56 was probably one of the less effective rounds developed for combat.  Far less effective than 30-06 or .308. Lighter and easier to carry in a jungle. 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 10:18 am

1.  They are not high powered firearms.  They fire intermediate powered cartridges.

2.  Even your article calls the bill weak.

3.  With the exception of the magazines the bill is basically external pieces.  You still can get an semi auto that is just as "powerful".  

https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Bil ... H5436A.pdf

4.  The bill grandfathers any weapon you have in possession before July 2026.  

5.  RI will be the next state to have ban compliant weapons.

1. They are not high powered firearms. They fire intermediate powered cartridges

**** ****.

 

Just a refresher for you.

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 8:44 am

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am

**** ****.

The 5.56×45mm NATO(official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO, commonly pronounced "five-five-six") is a rimless bottlenecked centerfireintermediate cartridge family developed in the late 1970s in Belgium by FN Herstal.[5] It consists of the SS109, L110, and SS111 cartridges. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56×45mm ... cartridges.

STFU about **** you know nothing about,

 

 

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 11:00 am

Just a refresher for you.

As I've told you.....you wouldn't know a case from a bream.


 

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 11:02 am

As I've told you.....you wouldn't know a case from a bream.

that is what you always say when you are severely wrong..

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 11:25 am

that is what you always say when you are severely wrong..

ProjectoFrediñho, please... 

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 11:31 am

ProjectoFrediñho, please...

Why are you so afraid to make your case here?  Oh, ai know.  The record is here and you can’t lie and reframe.

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 11:53 am

Why are you so afraid to make your case here?  Oh, ai know.  The record is here and you can’t lie and reframe.

That's a question.

You don't answer them.

You've made no case.

Mine is that the AR-15 is a high powered weapon, as demonstrated by its ability to kill at 1000 yds, with readily available ammo.


 

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 12:00 pm

That's a question.

You don't answer them.

You've made no case.

Mine is that the AR-15 is a high powered weapon, as demonstrated by its ability to kill at 1000 yds, with readily available ammo.

I do answer them and I answered that one,

As stated multiple times with citations and sources the NATO 5.56x45223 is the standard ammunition for the M16 and many. Semi Auto rifles.  In addition you have MULTIPLE firearms posted that are not high powered post to this thread that can kill at a 1000 yards.

YOU have provided no linked sources that back up your false assertion.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 10:18 am

1.  They are not high powered firearms.  They fire intermediate powered cartridges.

2.  Even your article calls the bill weak.

3.  With the exception of the magazines the bill is basically external pieces.  You still can get an semi auto that is just as "powerful".  

https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Bil ... H5436A.pdf

4.  The bill grandfathers any weapon you have in possession before July 2026.  

5.  RI will be the next state to have ban compliant weapons.

1. They are not high powered firearms. They fire intermediate powered cartridges

**** ****.

 

As you once again try to divert your case was it is **** that the weapons in question do not fire intermediate powered cartridges.

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 8:44 am

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am

**** ****.

The 5.56×45mm NATO(official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO, commonly pronounced "five-five-six") is a rimless bottlenecked centerfireintermediate cartridge family developed in the late 1970s in Belgium by FN Herstal.[5] It consists of the SS109, L110, and SS111 cartridges. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56×45mm ... cartridges.

STFU about **** you know nothing about,

 

 

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 1:09 pm

I do answer them 

Was the NATO 5.56 round developed for combat?

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm

Was the NATO 5.56 round developed for combat?

yup, as was the ammo listed on this thread for other firearms that can kill at a thousand yards.  Are they also fully charged cartridges?

your turn.  First time.

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm

As you once again try to divert your case was it is **** that the weapons in question do not fire intermediate powered cartridges.

Weapon v Round..


Weapon v. Round.

NATO 5.56 - Developed for combat

AR-15 - Designed for combat, high powered.


End of story...
 

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm

yup, as was the ammo listed on this thread for other firearms that can kill at a thousand yards.  Are they also fully charged cartridges?

your turn.  First time.

One down.