Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑Weapon v Round..*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ As you once again try to divert your case was it is **** that the weapons in question do not fire intermediate powered cartridges.
Weapon v. Round.
NATO 5.56 - Developed for combat
AR-15 - Designed for combat, high powered.
End of story...
Tiny,
Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
This has ALWAYS been about your ignorance of the history of the Colt AR-15/M16 family of weapons.
The entire yap fest about the 5.56 is the diversion
you never knew much...almost all of it wrong.
*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
This has ALWAYS been about your ignorance of the history of the Colt AR-15/M16 family of weapons.
The entire yap fest about the 5.56 is the diversion
I have forgotten more about it than you have ever know. You telling me about those weapons is like me telling you about living in Sweden.
No ****, my first comment to this thread to another poster was about 5.56. Candy ***, you jumped on that.
You are a **** liar. Or you are the **** dumbest **** on the forum. You gotta question to answer before we continue withyhour diversion. The intermediate powered cartridge is OVER. You lost.
FIFY, Cubicle.Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑you never knew much...almost all of it wrong.*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I have forgotten more about it than you have ever know. You telling me about those weapons is like me telling you about living in Sweden.
No ****, my first comment to this thread to another poster was about 5.56. Candy ***, you jumped on that.
You are a **** liar. Or you are the **** dumbest **** on the forum. You gotta question to answer before we continue withyhour diversion. The intermediate powered cartridge is OVER. You lost.
Run Options ******, Run! I answered your question ****. But you run. **** you and your Kung Fu Panda Stripes. You ain't ****, Duplex.yup, as was the ammo listed on this thread for other firearms that can kill at a thousand yards. Are they also fully charged cartridges?
*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑
FIFY, Cubicle.
Why are you, the ******, running from questions?
Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑That's a question.*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ Why are you so afraid to make your case here? Oh, ai know. The record is here and you can’t lie and reframe.
You don't answer them.
You've made no case.
Mine is that the AR-15 is a high powered weapon, as demonstrated by its ability to kill at 1000 yds, with readily available ammo.
*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Post your citation that says the NATO 5.56x45 is a fully charged cartridge and I will take a week off if they are legitimate.
I will declare victory now because you won't find one. If you had the courage of your convictions you would not only except but take a week off when you fail. You won't because you are a ******.
Except this.If you had the courage of your convictions you would not only except but take a week off when you fail. You won't because you are a ******.
Which diversion do you follow within a standard 1,064 major ideologies governing tomorrows international dateline to Greenwich Prime meridian(0 and 360 degrees longitude, noon relative time dawn to dusk, every rotation forward.*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ That is your diversion. Not mine. When you said that's **** I kicked **** ***. You have tried to lie your way out of it/
Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑
Except this.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
Set an example...
No...I can still hear you sobbing for quarter....
Try again....Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑No...I can still hear you sobbing for quarter....*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Damn, your recall is awful. My stand, which was proven correct, was that NATO 5.56x45 is an intermediate powered cartridge. Once you acknowledge that we can move on to whatever diversion you create.
Or you can go to the thread where that is being discussed. And you can answer the questions.
I accept your surrender. You reluctance to provide any citation that supports calling my original comment **** is your surrender as well as. your diversions and BS questions.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑No need.*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Try again....
Pepper Spray, there is NO context, none, where you can make sob for quarter. The more you ask questions, the more you reframe, only hammers home the fact I kicked your flabby *** once again.
Bother about this when you have something definitive with a source that shows NATO 5.56x45 is NOT an intermediate powered cartridge.
I told you when you do that I will take a week off. It is now down to 6 days.
Stapled shut.
Weapon*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ I accept your surrender. You reluctance to provide any citation that supports calling my original comment **** is your surrender as well as. your diversions and BS questions.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Weapon
V.
Round
NATO 5.56 was developed for combat.
Did you get any land mines yet? I sure hope Jeff Bezos doesn't start selling armed robot dogs on Amazon.*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ 1. That does not change the fact that NATO 5.56x45 is an intermediate charged cartridge and is the round used in combat.
2. A weapon is only as powerful of the round it is designed to fire, *******.
3..I was 100% correct in the statement you called **** on.
4. I see NO linked citations claiming I am wrong..
5. Yes it was designed for combat, *******. So was .45 ACP, 45 Long Colt, 9 mil, 7.62 etc etc etc. I am not getting your point.