Liberal Forum

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm

ask you Butt buddy, BV.  He is the ultimate weapons expert.  

         

Not really.  He is a **** on this issues

If words are bullets.. he could take out the best of them.  His accuracy isn't bad..  You consistently hook to the right with your confirmation bias.

JohnnyYou » 28 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm

If words are bullets.. he could take out the best of them.  His accuracy isn't bad..  You consistently hook to the right with your confirmation bias.

LMAO!  I kicked his *** on confirmation bias.  Andthen he lied about it.

I rarely post to your troll ****. But here is a piece of advice.  On topics that are firearms related or firearm laws related you don't want to hitch your wagon to his posts.  He is an idiot.

He just posted that all FMJ that was designed for combat should not be available to civilians.  I said cool.  You can have it.  That means I can still keep my allow points and any other round designed to fragment on impact.

But hey, it's your call.  He is one real ****.

@Blackvegetable  

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm

LMAO!  I kicked his *** on confirmation bias.  Andthen he lied about it.

I rarely post to your troll ****. But here is a piece of advice.  On topics that are firearms related or firearm laws related you don't want to hitch your wagon to his posts.  He is an idiot.

He just posted that all FMJ that was designed for combat should not be available to civilians.  I said cool.  You can have it.  That means I can still keep my allow points and any other round designed to fragment on impact.

But hey, it's your call.  He is one real ****.

@Blackvegetable

WTF are you going on about, dressed in your @* Tunic of Abjection?

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm

WTF are you going on about, dressed in your @* Tunic of Abjection?

I bought Huey a pair of cheap sunglasses today


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt8pQwnFwWQ

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm

WTF are you going on about, dressed in your @* Tunic of Abjection?

If you had any knowledge of the topic you would know.  Let me make it clear for You.  I promise to not carry any FMJ ammo and only use Nit on the range.  I will only carry cartridges that fragment, like hollow points. 

 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:10 am

If you had any knowledge of the topic you would know.  

It's not a "topic", 43MilesShort&WideOpen...it's a pathology....

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:14 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:10 am

If you had any knowledge of the topic you would know.  Let me make it clear for You.  I promise to not carry any FMJ ammo and only use Nit on the range.  I will only carry cartridges that fragment, like hollow points. 

 

It's not a "topic", 43MilesShort&WideOpen...it's a pathology....

 

Try again ****.

****, most smart people do not carry rounds designed for combat.  You are one ******* ****.  You entertain me.
 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:17 am

Try again ****.

****, most smart people do not carry rounds designed for combat.  You are one ******* ****.  You entertain me.

WTF would you know about "smart"?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:18 am

WTF would you know about "smart"?

YOU **** KNOW ****

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:18 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:17 am

Try again ****.

****, most smart people do not carry rounds designed for combat.  You are one ******* ****.  You entertain me.

WTF would you know about "smart"?

 

I know that FMJ is **** for self defense.  ;)

Prove me wrong ****.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:29 am

I know that FMJ is **** for self defense.  

Prove me wrong ****.

Why is that?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:55 am

Why is that?

Damn you're a stupid bastard.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:55 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:29 am

I know that FMJ is **** for self defense.  

Prove me wrong ****.

Why is that?

 

This is a repost:

In addition to the various advantages afforded by FMJ rounds, the Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III, prohibits the use in international warfare of bullets that easily expand or flatten in the body.

And this is a repost:

I don't carry rounds designed for combat.  Many with CCPs don't because they are not that great for self defense.  Keep talking....you look dumber by the post.

Read the first sentence then read the snippet I posted:

When it comes to selecting the right ammunition for self-defense, understanding the key differences between hollow-point and full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds is crucial.

(You don't understand the difference)

In contrast, full metal jacket (FMJ) ammunition features a bullet with no exposed lead on the nose or sides. FMJ rounds are commonly used for training purposes due to their affordability and reliability in semi-automatic firearms. However, they are not typically recommended for self-defense scenarios.One of the main drawbacks of FMJ ammunition is its tendency to over-penetrate. Unlike hollow-points, which expand upon impact and transfer all of their energy to the target, FMJ rounds may pass through the intended target and continue traveling, posing a risk to bystanders or property beyond the initial point of impact. This phenomenon is often likened to a pencil punching a hole through a target but then persisting in its trajectory.
 Unless mandated by law, opting for FMJ ammunition for self-defense carries significant considerations. Perfect target isolation and awareness of what lies beyond the target are essential when using FMJ rounds to minimize the risk of unintended consequences.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/h ... led-carry/

You logic is base on your ignorance to the subject.  **** Off, *******.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:52 am

This is a repost:


 

The answer is that the idea of knocking someone down with a lage projectile at 500+ uds., using a full load cartridge, is totally 1917...

Hence the SCHV program.

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:55 am

The answer is that the idea of knocking someone down with a lage projectile at 500+ uds., using a full load cartridge, is totally 1917...

Hence the SCHV program.

And again, most people don't carry that ammo.  Not very good for self defense.  Here is what you do.  Get a guy to shoot in one shoulder with FMJ.  Than have in shoot the other with some sort of hollow point.  Let me know which cause more damage.

Try again:

I don't carry rounds designed for combat.  Many with CCPs don't because they are not that great for self defense.  Keep talking....you look dumber by the post.

Read the first sentence then read the snippet I posted:

When it comes to selecting the right ammunition for self-defense, understanding the key differences between hollow-point and full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds is crucial.

(You don't understand the difference)

In contrast, full metal jacket (FMJ) ammunition features a bullet with no exposed lead on the nose or sides. FMJ rounds are commonly used for training purposes due to their affordability and reliability in semi-automatic firearms. However, they are not typically recommended for self-defense scenarios.One of the main drawbacks of FMJ ammunition is its tendency to over-penetrate. Unlike hollow-points, which expand upon impact and transfer all of their energy to the target, FMJ rounds may pass through the intended target and continue traveling, posing a risk to bystanders or property beyond the initial point of impact. This phenomenon is often likened to a pencil punching a hole through a target but then persisting in its trajectory.
 Unless mandated by law, opting for FMJ ammunition for self-defense carries significant considerations. Perfect target isolation and awareness of what lies beyond the target are essential when using FMJ rounds to minimize the risk of unintended consequences.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/h ... led-carry/

You logic is base on your ignorance to the subject.  **** Off, *******.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:55 am

The answer is that the idea of knocking someone down with a lage projectile at 500+ uds., using a full load cartridge, is totally 1917...

Hence the SCHV program.

It's entertaining to watch you run after you get checkmated.  Did my last post sizzle you to hard?       

 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:58 am

And again, most people don't carry that ammo.  

With good reason.

But this is about assault weapons.

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm

LMAO!  I kicked his *** on confirmation bias.  Andthen he lied about it.

I rarely post to your troll ****. But here is a piece of advice.  On topics that are firearms related or firearm laws related you don't want to hitch your wagon to his posts.  He is an idiot.

He just posted that all FMJ that was designed for combat should not be available to civilians.  I said cool.  You can have it.  That means I can still keep my allow points and any other round designed to fragment on impact.

But hey, it's your call.  He is one real ****.

@Blackvegetable

Narcissists can't help spewing out **** that they know nothing about. Has he used the word "ammosexual"  yet?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:00 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:58 am

And again, most people don't carry that ammo.  

With good reason.

But this is about assault weapons.

 

No, it was about the fact it fires an intermediate powered cartridge.  Wanna see?  I'll just do it.

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:08 am

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 10:18 am

1.  They are not high powered firearms.  They fire intermediate powered cartridges.

2.  Even your article calls the bill weak.

3.  With the exception of the magazines the bill is basically external pieces.  You still can get an semi auto that is just as "powerful".  

https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Bil ... H5436A.pdf

4.  The bill grandfathers any weapon you have in possession before July 2026.  

5.  RI will be the next state to have ban compliant weapons.

1. They are not high powered firearms. They fire intermediate powered cartridges

**** ****.

 

See what it s about.  Keep lying, ****.