Liberal Forum

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm

See what it s about.  Keep lying, ****.

We went through that...

You're engaged in verbal masturbation.

The weapons of the Colt AR-15/M16 family were developed to cripple and kill more effectively than the main battle rifles they replaced, which fired large projectiles with fully charged cartridges. 

This is also true for the NATO 5.56 round.


 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:18 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm

See what it s about.  Keep lying, ****.

We went through that...

You're engaged in verbal masturbation.

The weapons of the Colt AR-15/M16 family were developed to cripple and kill more effectively than the main battle rifles they replaced, which fired large projectiles with fully charged cartridges. 

This is also true for the NATO 5.56 roun

 

 

Yeah, we did go thru it. And it did not end well for you.  Remember, you claimed that 9 mil should not be in the hands of people because it was designed for combat.  Have no fear, most of us don't carry FMJ that was designed for combat.

NATO 5.56x45 and the M 16 are being replaced by a larger weapon and round.  Also, you discount the words of experts who tell you what is wrong with that round.

Next, it isn't that the round killed more effectively.  It doesn't.  That is why they are replacing it you stupid ****.  It was the fact that a soldier could carry MORE of it because it was smaller and lighter.  I posted that for you also, Mommy's little stupid ****.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm

Yeah, we did go thru it. And it did not end well for you.  Remember, .

It always ends at the same place...

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm

It always ends at the same place...

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

But that is not what this is about.  This is about the FACT that the 5.56 NATO round is nothing more than an intermediate powered cartridge.  The Sporter is not the only rifle to fire that round.

https://www.ruger.com/products/mini14Ra ... odels.html

So **** stupid.

Punch » 21 Jun 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 7:25 am

"This should make Trump and his Maga cult happy." David Hogg said laughing.

Rhode Island lawmakers pass bill to ban sales of assault weapons
(Full article at above link)

Rhode Island’s Democratic-controlled state House on Friday approved legislation that would ban the sale and manufacture of many semiautomatic rifles commonly referred to as assault weapons.The proposal now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. Daniel McKee, who has said he supports assault weapons bans. If the bill is signed into law, Rhode Island will join 10 other states that have some sort of prohibition on high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide and are now largely the weapon of choice among those responsible for most of the country’s mass shootings.Gun control advocates have been pushing for an assault weapons ban in Rhode Island for more than a decade. But despite being a Democratic stronghold, lawmakers throughout the country’s smallest state have long argued over the necessity and legality of such proposals.

Damn you're a stupid asshole.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:13 pm

But that is not what this is about.  This is about the FACT that the 5.56 NATO round is nothing more than an intermediate powered cartridge.  

why did militaries switch from full to intermediate cartridges?

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:18 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm

See what it s about.  Keep lying, ****.

We went through that...

You're engaged in verbal masturbation.

The weapons of the Colt AR-15/M16 family were developed to cripple and kill more effectively than the main battle rifles they replaced, which fired large projectiles with fully charged cartridges. 

This is also true for the NATO 5.56 roun

Yeah, we did go thru it. And it did not end well for you.  Remember, you claimed that 9 mil should not be in the hands of people because it was designed for combat.  Have no fear, most of us don't carry FMJ that was designed for combat.

NATO 5.56x45 and the M 16 are being replaced by a larger weapon and round.  Also, you discount the words of experts who tell you what is wrong with that round.

Next, it isn't that the round killed more effectively.  It doesn't.  That is why they are replacing it you stupid ****.  It was the fact that a soldier could carry MORE of it because it was smaller and lighter.  I posted that for you also, Mommy's little stupid ****.

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:13 pm

But that is not what this is about.  This is about the FACT that the 5.56 NATO round is nothing more than an intermediate powered cartridge.

why did militaries switch from full to intermediate cartridges?

WTF is wrong you?  Seriously, are you a functioning retard?  That has been posted over and over again.  And no, again:

Next, it isn't that the round killed more effectively.  It doesn't.  That is why they are replacing it you stupid ****.  It was the fact that a soldier could carry MORE of it because it was smaller and lighter.  I posted that for you also, Mommy's little stupid ****.

And you want us to believe you actually attended an Ivy League college.  So **** stupid.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm

why did militaries switch from full to intermediate cartridges?

There's no  arguing the fact that the smaller round was much more practical for short to medium range duty. 
The ability to get off a well aimed follow up shot leans in the smaller rifles favor.
This is why the AR 15 is so popular with millions of sportsman and self defenders.
In our nation of 350 million very few murders are committed with rifles in general and of course even fewer can be blamed on the AR15
If our nation's public school faculty  were encouraged to get carry permits and training, the number of school shootings would be reduced as well as the amount of carnage if a shooting takes place..
There is no doubt that disarming the law abiding public is a major ticket item of the Totalitarian Jew World Order, so it was very much a surprise to see a [[[JWO]]] propaganda source like NPR expose our JWO agenda driven public schools for lying massively about the number of school shootings that actually take place in the USA.........https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/08 ... hat-werent
 
 
 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 2:54 pm

WTF is wrong you?  

Melt down out of sight...

*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm

There's no  arguing the fact that the smaller round was much more practical for short to medium range duty. 

 

Gosh, Military Expert....you really don't know **** 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 3:52 pm

Gosh, Military Expert....you really don't know ****

Speaking of you not knowing **** : 

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 2:54 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:26 pm

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:18 pm

We went through that...

You're engaged in verbal masturbation.

The weapons of the Colt AR-15/M16 family were developed to cripple and kill more effectively than the main battle rifles they replaced, which fired large projectiles with fully charged cartridges. 

This is also true for the NATO 5.56 roun

Yeah, we did go thru it. And it did not end well for you.  Remember, you claimed that 9 mil should not be in the hands of people because it was designed for combat.  Have no fear, most of us don't carry FMJ that was designed for combat.

NATO 5.56x45 and the M 16 are being replaced by a larger weapon and round.  Also, you discount the words of experts who tell you what is wrong with that round.

Next, it isn't that the round killed more effectively.  It doesn't.  That is why they are replacing it you stupid ****.  It was the fact that a soldier could carry MORE of it because it was smaller and lighter.  I posted that for you also, Mommy's little stupid ****.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:13 pm

But that is not what this is about.  This is about the FACT that the 5.56 NATO round is nothing more than an intermediate powered cartridge.

why did militaries switch from full to intermediate cartridges?

WTF is wrong you?  Seriously, are you a functioning retard?  That has been posted over and over again.  And no, again:

Next, it isn't that the round killed more effectively.  It doesn't.  That is why they are replacing it you stupid ****.  It was the fact that a soldier could carry MORE of it because it was smaller and lighter.  I posted that for you also, Mommy's little stupid ****.

And you want us to believe you actually attended an Ivy League college.  So **** stupid.

 
 

 

@Blackvegetable  

Try again

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm

Melt down out of sight...

If you don’t edit the post you see there is no meltdown.  What one would see is you once again not reading info posted for you.  So in addition to be a convicted liar WTF is wrong with you?

Armslength, I would say that to your face and you won’t do ****, ******.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 4:48 pm

If you don’t edit the post you see there is no meltdown.  What one would see is you once again not reading info posted for you.  So in addition to be a convicted liar WTF is wrong with you?

Armslength, I would say that to your face and you won’t do ****, ******.

I don't edit your posts....if they aren't responsive, or labor a lie, I feel no need to read them.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 3:52 pm

Gosh, Military Expert....you really don't know ****

feel free to correct me then      

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 5:05 pm

I don't edit your posts....if they aren't responsive, or labor a lie, I feel no need to read them.

Sorry, I’m out   I am not dealing with a convicted liar ( viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96560 ) who does not read info posted to him.

And for the record, ******* ****, I don’t carry rounds designed for combat.  They don’t have the stopping power as already posted.


 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 5:31 pm

Sorry, I’m out   I am not dealing with a convicted liar 

Sell that crap elsewhere

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm

why did militaries switch from full to intermediate cartridges?

Because you're a *** child molester.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 6:12 pm

Sell that crap elsewhere

viewtopic.php?p=2766116#p2766116

Try again ya lying ****.  Matter of record, Bitch.  ArmsLeight, to your face.
 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 5:03 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:03 am

viewtopic.php?p=2766116#p2766116

Try again ya lying ****.  Matter of record, Bitch.  ArmsLeight, to your face.

everyone knows you're an illiterate liar.


https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=95998