Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:08 pm

He never called it underpowered, panty dancer.

He called it intermediate powered, not high powered.

Why do you keep trying to reframe the issue that YOU made an issue of? Embarrassed already?

It usually takes more pages of beat down. You're getting quicker, it appears.

discussing the underpowered round.

Kill yourself. 

I want to watch.

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm

My 

Answer the questions,  Sheilagh. 

 

Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm

No. THat was not the issue that you raised.

The issue was whether it is a high powered round or an intermediate powered round. 

Don't try to dance away from the issue you raised, panty boi.

**** off.

Please.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:04 pm

My point is made.  That has nothing to do with the fact that 556 is an intermediate cartridge.  You got busted lying.
 

Answer the questions,  Sheilagh. 

 

 

Try again.  Your question has nothing to do with the fact the 556 is an intermediate powered cartridge

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:17 pm

**** off.

Please.

You're lucky you said please.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 1:56 pm

Tiny,

Of what conceivable relevance is that?

Do you wear body armor or cotton?

are your panties padded or crotchless?
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:13 pm

Kill yourself. 

I want to watch.

The MARINE MAJOR called it underpowered FOR MILITARY ORDINANCE. 

Huey called it intermediate powered. 

You may continue your panty dance - you are free to move about the floor. 

Just stay away from my cockpit and other no zones. 

Punch » 21 Jun 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 7:25 am

"This should make Trump and his Maga cult happy." David Hogg said laughing.

Rhode Island lawmakers pass bill to ban sales of assault weapons
(Full article at above link)

Rhode Island’s Democratic-controlled state House on Friday approved legislation that would ban the sale and manufacture of many semiautomatic rifles commonly referred to as assault weapons.The proposal now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. Daniel McKee, who has said he supports assault weapons bans. If the bill is signed into law, Rhode Island will join 10 other states that have some sort of prohibition on high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide and are now largely the weapon of choice among those responsible for most of the country’s mass shootings.Gun control advocates have been pushing for an assault weapons ban in Rhode Island for more than a decade. But despite being a Democratic stronghold, lawmakers throughout the country’s smallest state have long argued over the necessity and legality of such proposals.

 
 

 

If you are a RI resident you have until Jul 2026 to pick up your Semi Auto Sports Rifle that fires an intermediate cartridge. Remember, this law allows you to keep any firearm purchased before then.

Or you can Move to a place like Salem NH.  Where there is no ban.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 10:47 am

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 10:46 am

forgot thto e link earlier:

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedi ... -not-rifle

Not answering the question...

Vietnam, 1965. According to the Army commander of the first U.S. unit to be engaged with major North Vietnamese Army (NVA) forces, "Even after being hit several times in the chest [with 5.56-mm rounds], many continued firing and moving for several more steps before dropping dead." Another infantry officer said, "In one fire fight, I saw my RTO [radio operator] place three rounds [of 5.56-mm] in the chest of a charging NVA regular at 50 yards. He kept firing his AK [Soviet AK-47 Assault Rifle] and never slowed down. At 30 yards, I hit him with a blast of double-ought buck. It picked him up off his feet and he didn't get up again."

Gulf War, 1991. A Marine officer reported that "several Marines commented that they had to shoot Iraqi soldiers 2-3 or more times with the 62-grain 5.56mm green tip ammo before they stopped firing back at them.... An Iraqi officer, still on fire, faced the firing line of Marines and charged forward firing his weapon from the hip. He didn't hit anyone, but two Marines each nailed him with a three-- round burst from their M-16A2s. One burst hit him immediately above his heart, the other in his belly button. [He] ... kept right on charging and firing until his magazine was empty.... The surgeons told me he certainly died of burns, but not necessary from the six 5.56-mm wounds."
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 10:39 am

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

LMAO!  

And that's why the Military is going with a larger, more powerful rifle.  You would know he issues with 556 if you ever read the info I provided you,  But, you the best example of stupid is as stupid does that I know.

Do you walk around in military spec body armor, or cotton?

All the examples previously posted and the below are thru cotton, ******* ****.

Somalia, 1993. Army Sergeant First Class Paul Howe, a Delta Force soldier, noted that the 5.56-mm green-tip round made a small clean hole and passed right through the enemy. Unless it happened to hit the heart or spine, it was not enough to stop a man in his tracks. "Howe felt like he had to hit a guy five or six times just to get his attention."

 Afghanistan, 2002. A soldier who preferred to remain anonymous e-mailed the following account to me in April 2002: "The current-issue 62-grain 5.56-mm (.223) round, especially when fired from the short-barreled, M-4 carbine, is proving itself (once again) to be woefully inadequate as [a] man stopper. Engagements at all ranges are requiring multiple, solid hits to permanently bring down enemy soldiers. Penetration is also sadly deficient. Even light barriers are not perforated by this rifle and cartridge combination."
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 10:39 am

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

LMAO!  

And that's why the Military is going with a larger, more powerful rifle.  You would know he issues with 556 if you ever read the info I provided you,  But, you the best example of stupid is as stupid does that I know.

Do you walk around in military spec body armor, or cotton?

More thru cotton, ******* motherfucekr.  This is what I call a **** case, Lil Jazz Hands.

These reports are consistent with my experience during three tours of duty in Vietnam from 1964 to 1969. It was apparent that the 5.56-mm cartridge was nothing more than the commercial Remington .223 cartridge used for hunting small game. (The state of Virginia does not permit it to be used for hunting deer because it cannot ensure a "clean kill" on deer.) Yet its full-metal-jacket military counterpart continues to be issued to U.S. combatants for the purpose of knocking down and killing or disabling enemy soldiers.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 10:39 am

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 9:54 am

LMAO!  

And that's why the Military is going with a larger, more powerful rifle.  You would know he issues with 556 if you ever read the info I provided you,  But, you the best example of stupid is as stupid does that I know.

Do you walk around in military spec body armor, or cotton?

The end of the Major's conclusion:

Replacing the 5.56-mm M-16A2 with a weapon chambered for the same cartridge only will perpetuate the round's deficiency and the increased logistic burden resulting from necessary and consequential higher volumes of fire.

 Major Milavic, a former enlisted man, served both in infantry and intelligence assignments. (you are neither, Office Boy)

Dude, you are a ******* cubicle coward.  I think the major is more educated than you on this topic.  Consider yourself thoroughly **** curb stomped on this topic
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:17 pm

**** off.

Please.

You look so **** stupid.
So ignorant
So overmatched
What a kick it is to watch you truth hating  libtards humiliate yourselves as well as destroy your credibility  on a daily basis.     
The AR 15 is considered too wimpy for  deer.

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:59 pm

The end of the Major's conclusion:


 

What's the "case"?

The round "isn't that lethal"..
 

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm

If you are a RI resident you have until Jul 2026 to pick up your Semi Auto Sports Rifle that fires an intermediate cartridge. Remember, this law allows you to keep any firearm purchased before then.

Or you can Move to a place like Salem NH.  Where there is no ban.

On behalf of beevee, I'd just like to correct that. It should say HIGH POWERED cartridge.

I've seen the photo - he once handled a shotgun in front of a camera. He knows his stuff.   
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 3:02 pm

What's the "case"?

The round "isn't that lethal"..

If you didn't see the case yet, wee queer, you're not going to see it.

But then, we already knew you were immune to evidence. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 3:02 pm

What's the "case"?

The round "isn't that lethal"..

By the way - remember that time I beat up your little buddy in front of his daughter and made him admit that dicks did not belong in her shower?              

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 3:02 pm

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:59 pm

The end of the Major's conclusion:

Replacing the 5.56-mm M-16A2 with a weapon chambered for the same cartridge only will perpetuate the round's deficiency and the increased logistic burden resulting from necessary and consequential higher volumes of fire.

 Major Milavic, a former enlisted man, served both in infantry and intelligence assignments. (you are neither, Office Boy)

Dude, you are a ******* cubicle coward.  I think the major is more educated than you on this topic.  Consider yourself thoroughly **** curb stomped on this topic

What's the "case"?

The round "isn't that lethal"..

Try again and take your argument up with the major.  Or those who decided a more powerful rifle and round was needed.  My case is done.

Take your L Jazz Hands and move on.  You are embarrassing yourself.  

As we speak I am looking at  at a few thousand rounds of 223 and 556 62 gr green tipped ammo that I inherited from my brother law and have not sold.  You wanna pay 10 bucks a box or 20 for it?  I bet the major doesn't.  You did catch the title of the article, correct?  Here it is:

It's the Cartridge, Stupid—Not the Rifle

By Major Anthony F. Milavic, U.S. Marine Corps (Retired)

I rest my case.

 
 

Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 3:09 pm

If you didn't see the case yet, wee queer, you're not going to see it.

But then, we knew you were immune to evidence.

It's so  completely silly, and entirely unrelated to a question long since resolved, that Quimmie won't articulate "the case".

*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 3:16 pm

Try again and take your argument up with the major.  

There's no case.

What's to argue?