Answer the questions.
Evidence of what?Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ If you didn't see the case yet, wee queer, you're not going to see it.
But then, we already knew you were immune to evidence.
Sandy Hook*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ All the examples previously posted and the below are thru cotton, ******* ****.
Somalia, 1993.
If the cowardly Shooter knew there was a very good chance he would be confronting a well armed and trained faculty...there is a very good chance that cooler heads would prevail,Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Sandy Hook
Mandalay Bay
Stoneman HS.
Uvalde.
Game, Set, Match.
Rambo,*GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Jun 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ If the cowardly Shooter knew there was a very good chance he would be confronting a well armed and trained faculty...there is a very good chance that cooler heads would prevail,
At worse, the Shooter would have met with deadly force from a highly motivated teacher or administrator ASAP.
I would prefer it if you wouldn't dodge my post on Iran, coward.Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I support the Second Amendment, but it is not a suicide pact.
Allowing blue state liberal males to have ANY weapons - even pocket knives - is a threat to pregnant women and to children.
I kicked your ,**** flabby *** on this. The 556 NATO round is an intermediate round that according to the military is not as effective as ******* **** cubicle, ****** wannabe’s think it it.Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Sandy Hook
Mandalay Bay
Stoneman HS.
Uvalde.
Game, Set, Match.
A report by the Texas House of Representatives Investigative Committee attributed the fault more widely to "systemic failures and egregious poor decision making" by many authorities. It said, "At Robb Elementary, law enforcement responders failed to adhere to their active shooter training, and they failed to prioritize saving the lives of innocent victims over their own safety... there was an unacceptably long period of time before officers breached the classroom, neutralized the attacker, and began rescue efforts."[11][12]*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I kicked your ,**** flabby *** on this. The 556 NATO round is an intermediate round that according to the military is not as effective as ******* **** cubicle, ****** wannabe’s think it it.
I gave you example after example of those wearing cotton who were shot with it. Get the **** out of my face. You are never was never will be office ******. Go fire and fire it and get the **** back with me, Jazz ApHands. This argument is over and you lost BIGLY. Don’t you have some **** paper work to do, Cubicle?
Bigly?*Huey » 22 Jun 2025, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑
I gave you example after example of those wearing cotton who were shot with it. Get the **** out of my face. You are never was never will be office ******. Go fire and fire it and get the **** back with me, Jazz ApHands. This argument is over and you lost BIGLY. Don’t you have some **** paper work to do, Cubicle?
UVALDE*GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Jun 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ If the cowardly Shooter knew there was a very good chance he would be confronting a well armed and trained faculty...there is a very good chance that cooler heads would prevail,
At worse, the Shooter would have met with deadly force from a highly motivated teacher or administrator ASAP.
I myself hope he changes is nurtured since birth, mind. Accepts life in real time gets a sole displacement to rather balance than tip the scales life exceeds time adapting equally here.
If the cowardly Shooter knew there was a very good chance he would be confronting a well armed and trained faculty...there is a very good chance that cooler heads would prevail,Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Rambo,
When talk turns to "the frequency", I'll get back to you.
1. He made 3 longs posts that looked a whole lot like HIS case - the case HE chooses to make.Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ It's so completely silly, and entirely unrelated to a question long since resolved, that Quimmie won't articulate "the case".
LMNOP.
Evidence of anything you do not wish to see.
This is your second post of the thread. The first was the OP. I have ducked no question - ever. And your mom never calls me coward. She calls me cowboy.Punch » 22 Jun 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I would prefer it if you wouldn't dodge my post on Iran, coward.
The blue box is evidence of your eager credulity, as are your youtube videos.
1) Yes....what do you continue lude his case is?Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2025, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. He made 3 longs posts that looked a whole lot like HIS case - the case HE chooses to make.
2. You have made no case whatsoever, so who the **** are you to cry about his case?
3. He does not owe it to you to make YOUR case. That's YOUR job.
I have no notion to what "blue box" you refer, dippy - and when it comes to credulity, you have been known to insist that many women have penises and gonads.Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ The blue box is evidence of your eager credulity, as are your youtube videos.