Liberal Forum

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/

White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.

Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.



 
 

"It's just common sense!"


F'n A are these people **** stupid.

“The intelligence says we don’t know,” he said. “It could have been very severe. That’s what the intelligence says. So I guess that’s correct, but I think we can take that we don’t know. It was very severe. It was obliteration.”

:die:  

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 9:45 am

“The intelligence says we don’t know,” he said. “It could have been very severe. That’s what the intelligence says. So I guess that’s correct, but I think we can take that we don’t know. It was very severe. It was obliteration.”

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 26 Jun 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 10:04 am

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

now that I reread the definition of survivorship bias the answer jumps out at me 

BuckNaked » 26 Jun 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 10:13 am

now that I reread the definition of survivorship bias the answer jumps out at me

Which definition did you use? The real definition from Google or BV's half assed ones. Because all the choices use BV's definitions, but only one is correct. His definition is sorely incomplete. His definition is like saying mild dizziness after standing up is the same as a heart attack. Sure, you will get dizzy during a heart attack, but the dizziness itself is not a heart attack. 

Vegas » 26 Jun 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 11:35 am

Which definition did you use? The real definition from Google or BV's half assed ones. Because all the choices use BV's definitions, but only one is correct. His definition is sorely incomplete. His definition is like saying mild dizziness after standing up is the same as a heart attack. Sure, you will get dizzy during a heart attack, but the dizziness itself is not a heart attack.

the one that popped up in google you want me to post it?

BuckNaked » 26 Jun 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 12:42 pm

the one that popped up in google you want me to post it?

Yes. Let @Blackvegetable  know that his definitions didn't help you in the least bit. It was the real definition you used. 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/

White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.

Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.




 
 

 

From google AI

https://www.google.com/search?
q=did+tulsi+gabbard+have+national+guard+commitments+last+week&rlz=1C1GCEA_enUS1034US1034&oq=did+tulsi+gabbard+hve+national+guard+commitments+last+we&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCQgBECEYChigATIGCAAQRRg5MgkIARAhGAoYoAEyCQgCECEYChigATIJCAMQIRgKGKABMgkIBBAhGAoYqwIyBwgFECEYjwIyBwgGECEYjwLSAQkyMDg1N2owajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

However, some sources mention that she was on National Guard duty, according to an administration official, which could explain her absence from certain meetings. It's important to note that the nature of these commitments, if any, is not specified

And as far as the Senate:

However, her attendance or involvement in certain meetings may be inconsistent or questioned, as evidenced by:

• A postponed Senate Intelligence Committee briefing amid tensions in the Middle East, with a source stating she had a "principal-level White House commitment".
• Contradictory information regarding her presence at a Camp David meeting, with one source suggesting she wasn't invited because her presence wasn't deemed necessary, while an administration official stated she was on National Guard duty.
• The White House reportedly moving a meeting to accommodate her schedule.
• An instance where she was absent from a White House briefing on Iran and the intelligence community was instead represented by another official.
• Reports that she has been "off-message" and potentially out of favor with the current administration. 

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/

White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.

Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Hey Dairy Queer Dickhead...

I know you only like fake news but here's some real news....good stuff too!



SCOTUS says states can defund Planned Parenthood

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/

White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.

Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The WashingtonPoop?            
 

Trump’s most sycophantic cabinet members, such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, have understood their assigned roles in this media spectacle and are shouting into the president’s bullhorn. “You want to call it destroyed? You want to call it defeated? You want to call it obliterated? Choose your word,” Hegseth defied the assembled press on Thursday.


He too then tried to paint any doubts about the fate of Iran’s nuclear program as bad faith by the press. “How about we celebrate” the mission, he gasped in mock exasperation. “How about we talk about how special America is? That only we have these capabilities?” In fact most of the early commentary, including mine, started with exactly that.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... age-it-did

The Democratic People's Republic grows the best rice!

Hail to The Great Leader! 
 

Trump is kickin ***

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 8:55 am

Trump’s most sycophantic cabinet members, such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, have understood their assigned roles in this media spectacle and are shouting into the president’s bullhorn. “You want to call it destroyed? You want to call it defeated? You want to call it obliterated? Choose your word,” Hegseth defied the assembled press on Thursday.

He too then tried to paint any doubts about the fate of Iran’s nuclear program as bad faith by the press. “How about we celebrate” the mission, he gasped in mock exasperation. “How about we talk about how special America is? That only we have these capabilities?” In fact most of the early commentary, including mine, started with exactly that.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... age-it-did

The Democratic People's Republic grows the best rice!

Hail to The Great Leader!

   

This is all they got.  BV the moron posts whatever Showercap tells him.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/

White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.

Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Hey ****, when does WW3 start?

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:47 am

   

This is all they got.  BV the moron posts whatever Showercap tells him.

Showercap isn't posting this week.


That's yet another @*HooooeyVagina faceplant...

 

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:53 am

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:47 am

   

This is all they got.  BV the moron posts whatever Showercap tells him.

Showercap isn't posting this week.


That's yet another @*HooooeyVagina faceplant...

 

 

 

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:49 am

Hey ****, when does WW3 start?

You idiots were crying about WW3..

https://nypost.com/2025/03/18/us-news/t ... d-war-iii/


Trump warns Americans ‘could’ become involved in Ukraine war if it escalates to ‘World War III’: ‘Strange things happen’



https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9dejydynngo

Trump accuses Zelensky of 'gambling with World War Three'

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 02079.html


Trump warns Ukraine’s incursion into Russia could spark ‘World War 3’ as he trashes Harris on foreign policy

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:56 am

Another case you can't make.
 

Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:59 am

*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 10:49 am

Hey ****, when does WW3 start?

You idiots were crying about WW3..

https://nypost.com/2025/03/18/us-news/t ... d-war-iii/


Trump warns Americans ‘could’ become involved in Ukraine war if it escalates to ‘World War III’: ‘Strange things happen’



https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9dejydynngo

Trump accuses Zelensky of 'gambling with World War Three'

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 02079.html


Trump warns Ukraine’s incursion into Russia could spark ‘World War 3’ as he trashes Harris on foreign policy

 

I wasn't.  Or, your rule.  Post my words.