Post the comment to which I responded.
Try gain, Pinocchio. But I agree. Just another day where you are running from your **** ups and getting your *** kicked.
More assertions.
Blackvegetable » 27 Jun 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ More assertions.
Was the NATO 5.5.56 round developed for combat?
If you don’t have the balls to go back to the original thread you are not man enough to make a case
You don't make cases...
Cubicle ******, when is WW3 starting? Run, ******, Run. See ya tomorrow, Girly man.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/
White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.
Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.
What is this OP about, Case Fail?*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Cubicle ******, when is WW3 starting? Run, ******, Run. See ya tomorrow, Girly man.
Are we going full geriatric tonight? Stage 47 Cancer is really hard to beat..Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... g-gabbard/
White House to limit intelligence sharing, skip Gabbard at Senate Iran briefing.
Top officials will brief lawmakers on Thursday amid a political battle over what intelligence reveals about the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities.
If you never know what the thread is about, how can you tell?*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ you don’t know about your own OP?
That’s funny coming from a guy who tries to reframe any thread he enters.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ If you never know what the thread is about, how can you tell?