Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 29 Jun 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:31 am

Mrs You's father took her to the Casino in Atlantic City in the 1980's . He pointed at Donald Trump live in person and said "That Man is an Asshole" 

News Flash Johnny...We all have retarded in-laws. 
 

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:45 am

News Flash Johnny...We all have retarded in-laws. 
 

and blood relatives.

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:45 am

News Flash Johnny...We all have retarded in-laws. 

Oh My..  I would never have guessed you would pick a short bus rider as a spouse.


Mrs You is stubborn, but she is capable of independent thought.

JohnnyYou » 29 Jun 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:56 am

Oh My..  I would never have guessed you would pick a short bus rider as a spouse.

Mrs You is stubborn, but she is capable of independent thought.

WoW! just WOW....I said in-law...is Mrs. You, your in-law?
 

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:59 am

WoW! just WOW....I said in-law...is Mrs. You, your in-law?
 

wife in law comes from a separate ancestral lineage than your own previous generations and nieces, nephews, sons and daughters replacing your wife and you since added to time alive in this atmosphere existing in series parallel positions living each separate heart beat never duplicating previous details again.

See what I mean when discussing series parallel compounding changes currently taking place now. It is universally constant. perpetual balancing outcomes have specific limitations to things inhabiting space now.

thermodynamic principles vs principals of doubt marketing artificial tomorrows 7 days a week in relative time theory, evolution theory, spiritual theology, economic values of who's who so far.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 5:41 am

Because @Cannonpointer  is a sore loser.

Oh, I'm not the one who lost my innocence to you, skeezy. We are still tracking your victims - but I'm not one of the them.

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 5:53 am

Sore loser about what? I really don't know what any of that is about.

I wasn't able to save his daughter's innocence from him.
 

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 6:03 am

None of that makes sense to be. But thanks anyway.

Imagine a gay old man with tiny feet trying to pretend to be dennis miller with the obscure references, thinking it makes him look "clever" and "hip."

He never was - not at any point. But now, it's just really sad to watch.

And he has tiny, tiny feet. And he still trips over them when he is taken snipe hunting. 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:14 am

Oh, I'm not the one who lost my innocence to you, skeezy. We are still tracking your victims - but I'm not one of the them.

I wouldn't punch that suppurating freckle with Tiny's face...

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:45 am

News Flash Johnny...We all have retarded in-laws. 

You met Grifty on The Apprentice...
some of us knew him from the 80s..

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 7:12 am

Did U learn your "wing chun" from Tampon Timmy?

No, he got it from a kotex commercial.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeCuZUa43Ag
 

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 8:33 am

Be a man Johnny. You know @Cannonpointer put that there. Why are you scared of CP? I'm not. I believe anyone who supports the democrat party, supports the GROOMING of the kids. Did you support the dem party?

He did, he does, he has groomed, they are all child groomers.

I have caught little johnny grooming. Or defending grooming - same **** thing. 

People fail to understand: The reason I give groomers those titles is that I am not currently in a position to line them up and summarily execute them.

But that day is coming. They'll all be hollerin' - and this time, it won't be the Hohenzollern. It'll be the cannon, pointing at them. 
 

JohnnyYou » 29 Jun 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 8:51 am

Nine times out of Ten  the accuser  should be the accused.  CP may still be traumatized from abuse by the clergy as a kid or something.

Not directly - but you're in the neighborhood. 

There were three kids on my block who got anally raped by Father Russo. But I was not one of them. He was a total asshole to me - wouldn't give me the time of day. 

When I dressed sexy around him, he reminded me that my family was Protestant. "If you're too good to pray to the Virgin, lad, you're too good for all of the hotness under my robe. Besides, no chubbies, lad. You need a growth spurt before you'll be getting any of THIS 'holy water', my boy."

It was quite remarkable how well Father Russo - an Italian immigrant - had mastered an Irish brogue. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:18 am

I wouldn't punch that suppurating freckle with Tiny's face...

Or, "Those grapes are probably sour."

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:33 am

Not directly - but you're in the neighborhood. 

There were three kids on my block who got anally raped by Father Russo. But I was not one of them. He was a total asshole to me - wouldn't give me the time of day. 

When I dressed sexy around him, he reminded me that my family was Protestant. "If you're too good to pray to the Virgin, lad, you're too good for all of the hotness under my robe. Besides, no chubbies, lad. You need a growth spurt before you'll be getting any of THIS 'holy water', my boy."

It was quite remarkable how well Father Russo - an Italian immigrant - had mastered an Irish brogue.

I am grateful you were not hurt.  I kind of figured you had a lot of religion in your childhood.

I was fortunate on that score.  I was 18 and was befriended by a Russian at the bar who invited me to his place for Vodka.  He hit on me and was quite disappointed that Johnny didn't like his apple seeds.  Alcohol has almost got me tits up in more ways than one over the years.  The crack addiction of the 80's was survived with a 20K cocaine debt.  Mrs. You pulled me through.

Honestly man, I would do nothing to harm a child intentionally.  But you may be correct in your perception I am capable of poor decisions.  I did not do the greatest job as as step dad.  But almost all of the youth today seem brainwashed in narcissistic thugism and care only about themselves.

The clergy are sick..  But someone pointed out to me only like 2% of them are and that law enforcement gets into the double digits...
 

JohnnyYou » 29 Jun 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:57 am

I am grateful you were not hurt.  I kind of figured you had a lot of religion in your childhood.

I was fortunate on that score.  I was 18 and was befriended by a Russian at the bar who invited me to his place for Vodka.  He hit on me and was quite disappointed that Johnny didn't like his apple seeds.  Alcohol has almost got me tits up in more ways than one over the years.  The crack addiction of the 80's was survived with a 20K cocaine debt.  Mrs. You pulled me through.

Honestly man, I would do nothing to harm a child intentionally.  But you may be correct in your perception I am capable of poor decisions.  I did not do the greatest job as as step dad.  But almost all of the youth today seem brainwashed in narcissistic thugism and care only about themselves.

The clergy are sick..  But someone pointed out to me only like 2% of them are and that law enforcement gets into the double digits...

Someone lied to you. They reversed the stats.

2% of clergy AREN'T in it for the child sex.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 5:46 am

so, once again, you have no idea what you're tantrumstalking about.

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:46 am

Or, "Those grapes are probably sour."

Grapes don't carry syphilis. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 5:44 am

What do the links in question cover?

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:15 am

Grapes don't carry syphilis.

I will accept your expertise.

Continue your investigations. Science is counting on you.