Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 10:34 am

What a cornhole.

Am I wrong? 



1. This will be easy. You will copy/paste something I said. Thereby, once again, proving you have no thoughts of your own.

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 10:38 am

I'm sorry.....your thread title, which I have posted, is production falling.  The same citation I posted you also posted.  the B/D are the same for this year and last year.

And yeah, I know there are less rigs.  Rmember, we discussed the reason why oil production was up with less rigs due to technologies developed over the past decade.

Please **** stop.

yeah, I know there are less rigs.  Rmember, we discussed the reason why oil production was up with less rigs due to technologies developed over the past decade.

Rig count is down y.o.y., **** idiot.

Vegas » 17 Jul 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 10:43 am

Am I wrong? 

1. This will be easy. You will copy/paste something I said. Thereby, once again, proving you have no thoughts of your own.

You are so unbelievably **** stupid..

3. Continue to copy me

this dumb piece of **** cries...

"I posted my definition of survivorship bias..."

After "copying" me.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 12:28 pm

Please **** stop.

Rig count is down y.o.y., **** idiot.

And yet production is predicted to remain the same this year and next year.  


 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 12:53 pm

And yet production is predicted to remain the same this year and next year.

Those facts are irreconcilable.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:00 pm

Those facts are irreconcilable.

 
 

 

And yet you posted a citation projection the B/D would remain the same.

The number of rigs has been down for years.

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/e_ertr ... nus_cm.htm

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:25 pm

And yet you posted a citation projection the B/D would remain the same.

The number of rigs has been down for years.

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/e_ertr ... nus_cm.htm

Again...

The facts continue to defy the projections..

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 12:46 pm

You are so unbelievably **** stupid..

this dumb piece of **** cries...

After "copying" me.

      You are the one that demands I post your definition while you are literally quoting me posting your definition. 

And he calls me stupid. The irony. 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 10:14 am

How do I "spin" an 8% reduction in rig count?

Not mentioning they are on dried up wells where fracking isn't allowed. Or the offshore locations are passed their prime after used for so many decades.

You promise an anything else is possible New World Order to the old adapt or become extinct evolving universe that hasn't changed since inception every conception changing current population 1 specific great great grandchild ancestor at a time.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:27 pm

Again...

The facts continue to defy the projections..

And yet, from 2013-2023 the US produced record numbers with  less rigs.  

We have discussed this when you would try to give Joe Biden credit for the record numbers but in fact it was due to the industries technological advances. Having recall issues?

 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:51 pm

Having recall issues?

Yes! He does. It's called narcissistic  amnesia. Does this sound familiar?

Narcissistic amnesia is a non-clinical term often used to describe a behavior pattern where a narcissist seems to "forget" or completely disregard past events, especially those that don’t serve their current narrative, self-image, or manipulation tactics. It’s not true memory loss like in neurological conditions—it’s selective and strategic.

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:51 pm

And yet, from 2013-2023 the US produced record numbers with  less rigs.  

 

it's called "diminishing return".

But the real reasons are low oil prices and expectations that Grifty will **** up even worse.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 2:12 pm

it's called "diminishing return".

But the real reasons are low oil prices and expectations that Grifty will **** up even worse.

 

And yet, from 2013-2023 the US produced record numbers with  less rigs.  

We have discussed this when you would try to give Joe Biden credit for the record numbers but in fact it was due to the industries technological advances. Having recall issues?


Just wanted the entire post to be seen, Edit.

I get what you are saying.  The citation you posted is not reliable. 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 2:35 pm

And yet,

I have been hearing DRILLERS talk about what they are going to do in the next year - for more than a decade.

This is the guy THEY use.....he even joked about how poorly eia does with projections...

We have discussed this when you would try to give Joe Biden credit for the record numbers but in fact it was due to the industries technological advances. Having recall issues?

Tiny, 

No more retelling....You know your rule....

"Give Biden credit......"


You're a **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 3:12 pm

I have been hearing DRILLERS talk about what they are going to do in the next year - for more than a decade.

This is the guy THEY use.....he even joked about how poorly eia does with projections...

Tiny, 

No more retelling....You know your rule....

"Give Biden credit......"

You're a **** idiot.

busting you in more lies.  **** off.  It is already good catching you, Born Liar.

 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 4:57 pm

busting you in more lies.  **** off.  It is already good catching you, Born Liar.

Never happened, never will.

Would you like to see how that's done?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 5:36 pm

*Huey » 17 Jul 2025, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 4:57 pm

busting you in more lies.  **** off.  It is already good catching you, Born Liar.

Never happened, never will.

Would you like to see how that's done?

Hey, Chicken Legs, stop talking about it.  Just **** do it.

But I do have this ya **** lying lil bitch:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96560
 

*Huey » 18 Jul 2025, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 5:04 am

Hey, Chicken Legs, stop talking about it.  Just **** do it.

But I do have this ya **** lying lil bitch:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96560

Yes, that OP is a lie.

Here's another...


 
You lie a lot.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 7:05 am

Yes, that OP is a lie.

Here's another...


 
You lie a lot.

Quoting you in full and VERBATIM (LMAO) with links is not a lie.  

Why are you afraid to link to that discussion?  You leaving a lil bit out, aren't you?

*Huey » 18 Jul 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 7:32 am

Quoting you in full and VERBATIM (LMAO) with links is not a lie.  

Why are you afraid to link to that discussion?  You leaving a lil bit out, aren't you?

But you didn't....you just linked to the lying OP.

Why are you afraid to link to that discussion?  

what difference will the link make?

That post is indisputable evidence that you're a liar.

As is your op..