Liberal Forum

 Trump, left, and Epstein, second from right, at the Mar-a-Lago club in 2000. Source: Davidoff Studios/Getty Images

• IMDb lists his height as 5' 10" (1.78 m).

I guess it can't be Grifty...





So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:23 pm

 Trump, left, and Epstein, second from right, at the Mar-a-Lago club in 2000. Source: Davidoff Studios/Getty Images

• IMDb lists his height as 5' 10" (1.78 m).

I guess it can't be Grifty...

So **** g'ddammned stupid

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me



Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 17 Jul 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:49 pm

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me


 

So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 2:13 pm

So **** g'ddammned stupid

I see my predictions have stonewalled you into silence.       

100% accuracy. 

 
@ROG62  


So **** g'ddammned stupid.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2025, 1:23 pm

 Trump, left, and Epstein, second from right, at the Mar-a-Lago club in 2000. Source: Davidoff Studios/Getty Images

• IMDb lists his height as 5' 10" (1.78 m).

I guess it can't be Grifty...





So **** g'ddammned stupid 

 

We all know that IMDB is the end all be all of legit sources but if you are going to use them then you must honestly report IMDB lists Trump as 6'3".

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0874339/bio ... _ov_bio_sm

Whoever told you to think that **** you.

So **** damn stupid.  Did you daddy slap yo momma when he realized how stupid you are?

 

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 9:33 am

We all know that IMDB is the end all be all of legit sources but if you are going to use them then you must honestly report IMDB lists Trump as 6'3".

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0874339/bio ... _ov_bio_sm

Whoever told you to think that **** you.

So **** damn stupid.  Did you daddy slap yo momma when he realized how stupid you are?

Do you have a point, other than to insist on another rule?

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:48 am

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 9:33 am

We all know that IMDB is the end all be all of legit sources but if you are going to use them then you must honestly report IMDB lists Trump as 6'3".

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0874339/bio ... _ov_bio_sm

Whoever told you to think that **** you.

So **** damn stupid.  Did you daddy slap yo momma when he realized how stupid you are?

Do you have a point, other than to insist on another rule?

You are a **** retard.  If you believe IMDB is correct and Epstein is 5'10" you have to also accept IMDB when they report Trump is 6'3.

So **** damn stupid.  Did you daddy slap yo momma when he realized how stupid you are?
 
 

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:50 am

You are a **** retard.  If you believe IMDB is correct and Epstein is 5'10" you have to also accept IMDB when they report Trump is 6'3.

So **** damn stupid.  Did you daddy slap yo momma when he realized how stupid you are?

you have to also accept

Post this rule.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:58 am

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:50 am

You are a **** retard.  If you believe IMDB is correct and Epstein is 5'10" you have to also accept IMDB when they report Trump is 6'3.

So **** damn stupid.  Did you daddy slap yo momma when he realized how stupid you are?

you have to also accept

Post this rule.

 

Tell you what.  Dp something you fear.  Take a stand and I will post a rule.  Taking a stand is something you have feared most of your life, Daddy's ******.

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm

Tell you what.  

Unless it is the rule, spare me.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:01 pm

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm

Tell you what.  

Unless it is the rule, spare me.

 

Sorry Daddy's ******, that is not the whole quote.  Try again.

Good thing you didn't join.  One family member running away from the sound of gunfire is enough.

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:02 pm

Sorry 

then run away quietly...

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:01 pm

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm

Tell you what.  

Unless it is the rule, spare me.

 

PS.

There you have it folks, BV agrees that Trump is 6'3" tall.

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:04 pm

PS.

There you have it folks, BV agrees that Trump is 6'3" tall.

Not unless there is a rule...

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:03 pm

then run away quietly...

I am not running.  I agree you agree that Trump is 6'3'' tall according to your source.  You the man.

Did daddy know how stupid and cowardly you are?  Oh, wait, he is the one who ran from gunfire.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:05 pm

Not unless there is a rule...

I am using YOUR source.  Take a stand a ****. Now you are saying your source is correct on one and wrong on another.

I am **** you up with your own post.  And you are too stupid to see it.  Ivy League my ***. 

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:08 pm

I am using YOUR source.  

Post the rule.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:10 pm

Post the rule.

Post the rule about posting rules.


1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:10 pm

Post the rule.

Take a stand ****.

Or keep running like daddy.