Liberal Forum

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:12 pm

Take a stand ****.

Or keep running like daddy.

You must be taking another savage beating.

Your PTSD is yapping.


 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm

You must be taking another savage beating.

Your PTSD is yapping.

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 26 Jul 2025, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:20 pm

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me


 

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:12 pm

Take a stand ****.

Or keep running like daddy.

You must be taking another savage beating.

Your PTSD is yapping.


 

 

Cubicle, you have done nothing in life to understand PTSD.  

Again, your stand at the moment is trump is 6'3" because your source says so.  Feel free to make another argument.

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:24 pm

Cubicle, you have done nothing in life to understand PTSD.  

Again, your stand at the moment is trump is 6'3" because your source says so.  Feel free to make another argument.

Mine eyes have seen the Casualties of August, 2017..

Mine ears have been smothered in the din of their queefing.

In the absence of the rule obliging me, I don't feel obliged.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:27 pm

Mine eyes have seen the Casualties of August, 2017..

Mine ears have been smothered in the din of their queefing.

In the absence of the rule obliging me, I don't feel obliged.

That's nice. Your own source says Trump is 6'3'' tall.

Thread fail!

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:23 pm

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 

How many **** times...

1.How do you not know the drill by now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=341s

Vegas » 26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 


 

Then I guess we're done for the day..

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm

That's nice. Your own source says Trump is 6'3'' tall.

Thread fail!

How does that make the triangulation hypothesis MORE convincing?


So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:32 pm

Vegas » 26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 



 

Then I guess we're done for the day..

 

Sure Mr Last Word.

He kicked your *** again.

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:34 pm

Sure Mr Last Word.

He kicked your *** again.

    Often times he kicks his own ***. 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:34 pm

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm

That's nice. Your own source says Trump is 6'3'' tall.

Thread fail!

How does that make the triangulation hypothesis MORE convincing?


So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

 

God God, it is hard to believe your relatives are who you say they are when you make such idiotic threads.


 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:32 pm

Then I guess we're done for the day..

What's the matter? You can't come up with thoughts of your own, so you are checking out? Typical.


1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:35 pm

God God, it is hard to believe your relatives are who you say they are when you make such idiotic threads.

Prove it by answering, rather than running from, the question. 

Vegas » 26 Jul 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:36 pm

What's the matter? 

There's no entertaining stalking today...

Your rule.

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:34 pm

Sure Mr Last Word.

He kicked your *** again.

How so, About to Take Another Powder?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:36 pm

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:35 pm

God God, it is hard to believe your relatives are who you say they are when you make such idiotic threads.

Prove it by answering, rather than running from, the question. 

 

Sorry, once you take a stand on your source I will prove it AGAIN.  Man up Daddy's lil ******.  You aint **** ****. You personal story is ****, your dad ain't who you claim, you did were not raised in Swedish Titled Families, and your uncle was not a Flying Tiger.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:37 pm

There's no entertaining stalking today...

Your rule.

That's everybody's rule...except yours.

Which one of us spends hours in other people's profile? 

Yeah, there you go. QED

Vegas » 26 Jul 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:41 pm

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:37 pm

There's no entertaining stalking today...

Your rule.

That's everybody's rule...except yours.

Which one of us spends hours in other people's profile? 

Yeah, there you go. QED

 

He probably does spend hours in profiles BUT he also is one of those sickos who save personal info AND posts to files.  That is how he is able to post partial quotes from threads that no longer exist.

 

*Huey » 26 Jul 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 12:45 pm

He probably does spend hours in profiles BUT he also is one of those sickos who save personal info AND posts to files.  That is how he is able to post partial quotes from threads that no longer exist.

Definitely. The main reason why this makes him psychotic and mentally deranged is because he literally sees nothing wrong with it. The guy is mentally sick.

@Blackvegetable