Liberal Forum

That appears to be what MAGAs are doing about this whole Epstein list issue. Since Trump has done some great things, such as deportations, putting foreign nations in their place, ceasing wars, and inducing economic prosperity, then the benefit clearly outweighs the cost of busting him for covering up the list...probably because he was on it. 

Well...on the surface, this sounds like a solid argument. However, it's a knee jerk reaction. This is about sex trafficking children. It's not about his affairs and other flaws. His affairs are his business. Nobody should care about those things. But sex trafficking children? There needs to be a line between helping the greater good and morality. 

This reminds me of the Vatican and Mother Theresa. She was considered a saint. The world loved her. Well, what you probably didn't know about her is that a lot of her funding came from organized crime. The same type of people who trafficked children. Her hospitals were deplorable. They were dirty, understaffed, and wouldn't survive even a day under the health codes of most developed countries. Her charity received millions and millions of dollars. There was no reason why her hospitals should have been that bad. She used most of the money to expand the Catholic church, not to help the greater good. 

The point is that morality and helping the greater good can sometimes clash. What kind of people do we want to be in America? Defend short term gains...that will probably disappear in 4 years anyway, or do we want to be a country that takes the protection of children seriously. 
 

Vegas » 18 Jul 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 11:31 am

That appears to be what MAGAs are doing about this whole Epstein list issue. Since Trump has done some great things, such as deportations, putting foreign nations in their place, ceasing wars, and inducing economic prosperity, then the benefit clearly outweighs the cost of busting him for covering up the list...probably because he was on it. 

Well...on the surface, this sounds like a solid argument. However, it's a knee jerk reaction. This is about sex trafficking children. It's not about his affairs and other flaws. His affairs are his business. Nobody should care about those things. But sex trafficking children? There needs to be a line between helping the greater good and morality. 

This reminds me of the Vatican and Mother Theresa. She was considered a saint. The world loved her. Well, what you probably didn't know about her is that a lot of her funding came from organized crime. The same type of people who trafficked children. Her hospitals were deplorable. They were dirty, understaffed, and wouldn't survive even a day under the health codes of most developed countries. Her charity received millions and millions of dollars. There was no reason why her hospitals should have been that bad. She used most of the money to expand the Catholic church, not to help the greater good. 

The point is that morality and helping the greater good can sometimes clash. What kind of people do we want to be in America? Defend short term gains...that will probably disappear in 4 years anyway, or do we want to be a country that takes the protection of children seriously.

Prediction -

This **** coward won't defend his OP...
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm

Prediction -

This **** coward won't defend his OP...

      Not to you, I wont. I will with everyone else. Why? Because you haven't answered my question so I don't owe you a **** thing. 

The mind's eye is always blind to what each brain sees navigating space being alive one at a time now since conceived to live reproductively here in chronological order of arrival in their own ancestral lineage living daily here between last 5 generation gaps alive.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm

Prediction -

This **** coward won't defend this OP...

I highly doubt he's a goat **** or a coward....now you on the other hand...

ROG62 » 19 Jul 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 6:09 am

I highly doubt he's a goat **** or a coward....now you on the other hand...

But you're JuCo..

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 7:05 am

But you're JuCo..

don't forget 5%er, duplex guy...
 

ROG62 » 19 Jul 2025, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 7:07 am

don't forget 5%er, duplex guy...

Your humble squat plus your net worth MIGHT be enough to bid on my "duplex"

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm

Prediction -

This **** coward won't defend his OP...
 

When do self evident results have to defend themselves from theories and theologies suggesting things actually existing aren't existing as displaced so far?

ROG62 » 19 Jul 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 6:09 am

I highly doubt he's a goat **** or a coward....now you on the other hand...

   

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 7:09 am

Your humble squat plus your net worth MIGHT be enough to bid on my "duplex"

Why in the world would he want to live in that duplex? Or any duplex for that matter?

Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?

*Huey » 19 Jul 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 11:06 am

Why in the world would he want to live in that duplex? Or any duplex for that matter?

For one, it's not a duplex, for another it is far more scenic than your conforming lot or his squat by the river.

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 1:16 pm

For one, it's not a duplex, for another it is far more scenic than your conforming lot or his squat by the river.

Veghead pretending that he he is superior over someone else again. **** narcissists. You retards are so pathetic. 

Your home is ****. You are not living it up, so stop trying to embellish your lifestyle as something more than it is. 

Vegas » 19 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm

Veghead pretending that he he is superior over someone else again. **** narcissists. You retards are so pathetic. 

Your home is ****. You are not living it up, so stop trying to embellish your lifestyle as something more than it is.

No we are just tired of the doom azzness


 

Vegas » 19 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm

Veghead pretending that he he is superior over someone else again. **** narcissists. You retards are so pathetic. 

Your home is ****. You are not living it up, so stop trying to embellish your lifestyle as something more than it is.

ANY home with a shared wall is not living it up.
ANY home that relies on a common area is not your yard.

HOA's are for old farts and Karens. I see those causing friction all the time.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm

Prediction -

This **** coward won't defend his OP...

Oh yes I will.

Wait - do you mean Vegas won't?

I know I will defend that OP. I agree with its conclusion. There is no excuse for hiding that list. 

There are REASONS. But there's no excuse. 

If there even is a list. Five D chess, man.
 
 

PhiloBeddo » 19 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 11:10 am

Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?

Trump talked him out of it?
 

Vegas » 19 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm

Veghead pretending that he he is superior 

Who isn't superior to a greasy little **** like you?

Even a Syphilitic Cumbucket...


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 4:04 pm

Who isn't superior to a greasy little **** like you?

Even a Syphilitic Cumbucket...

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors