Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Turn a blind eye for the greater good
Turn a blind eye for the greater good
By Vegas
18 Jul 2025 11:31 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
22 Jul 2025 1:14 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did you get that precise definition of Survivorship bias?
Everyone knows you're too stupid.
Certainly not from you. Mr "Sampling error" and "mortality of the data."
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jul 2025 1:24 pm
What type of error IS Survivorship bias?Vegas » 22 Jul 2025, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Certainly not from you. Mr "Sampling error" and "mortality of the data."
What is it about the population that makes sampling it subject to Survivorship bias?
22 Jul 2025 1:26 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ What type of error IS Survivorship bias?
What is it about the population that makes sampling it subject to Survivorship bias?
Look at this ****. Look at this. This mother **** can't get out of his stage 4 evasion if he tried.
1. Continue to bombard me with questions while ignoring the original question.
2. Rules don't apply to narcissists...He demands I answer him while ignoring my question.
Puke.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jul 2025 1:29 pm
Exactly.
This is why you are not qualified to judge my reasoning.
22 Jul 2025 1:35 pm
Maga people overall are "Good People".Vegas » 18 Jul 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ That appears to be what MAGAs are doing about this whole Epstein list issue. Since Trump has done some great things, such as deportations, putting foreign nations in their place, ceasing wars, and inducing economic prosperity, then the benefit clearly outweighs the cost of busting him for covering up the list...probably because he was on it.
Well...on the surface, this sounds like a solid argument. However, it's a knee jerk reaction. This is about sex trafficking children. It's not about his affairs and other flaws. His affairs are his business. Nobody should care about those things. But sex trafficking children? There needs to be a line between helping the greater good and morality.
This reminds me of the Vatican and Mother Theresa. She was considered a saint. The world loved her. Well, what you probably didn't know about her is that a lot of her funding came from organized crime. The same type of people who trafficked children. Her hospitals were deplorable. They were dirty, understaffed, and wouldn't survive even a day under the health codes of most developed countries. Her charity received millions and millions of dollars. There was no reason why her hospitals should have been that bad. She used most of the money to expand the Catholic church, not to help the greater good.
The point is that morality and helping the greater good can sometimes clash. What kind of people do we want to be in America? Defend short term gains...that will probably disappear in 4 years anyway, or do we want to be a country that takes the protection of children seriously.
They are "Bitter" because OUR SYSTEM "Failed" them so they turned to a guy like Donald Trump who promises the "Moon & Stars" too..
People with an IQ level "greater" than their Shoe Size honestly know he cant really deliver
22 Jul 2025 2:32 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly.
This is why you are not qualified to judge my reasoning.
Look...we both know that you won't answer. I knew that since the first day I posted the question. I do this to continue to demoralize you. Period. That's it.
And there is no judging in a multiple choice you God dam stupid mother ****. What the hell is wrong with you/?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jul 2025 3:31 pm
damm……AI gives the largest, but not the longest run ugh
22 Jul 2025 4:07 pm
You realize that he will not keep his promise after you answer him, right? He is doing what narcissists do...stringing you along and lying.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jul 2025 6:49 pm
But do ya know our so -called "SOCIETY" trained to follow "Narcacists'" & Liars tooVegas » 22 Jul 2025, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ You realize that he will not keep his promise after you answer him, right? He is doing what narcissists do...stringing you along and lying.
22 Jul 2025 6:52 pm
TwoIfByTea » 22 Jul 2025, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ But do ya know our so -called "SOCIETY" trained to follow "Narcacists'" & Liars too
Ghislaine Maxwell got summoned to Congress to testify on the crime she is in jail for never happened?
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
22 Jul 2025 7:44 pm
What did they tell you about the largest?
22 Jul 2025 7:47 pm
I've told you that 3 don't qualify under the given definition.Vegas » 22 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Look...we both know that you won't answer. I knew that since the first day I posted the question. I do this to continue to demoralize you. Period. That's it.
And there is no judging in a multiple choice you God dam stupid mother ****. What the hell is wrong with you/?
That only leaves one...
Leaving me to wonder why you continue to deny the obvious.
22 Jul 2025 8:28 pm
Don’t remember I’ll have to look it up after I have some ice cream
22 Jul 2025 8:36 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2025, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I've told you that 3 don't qualify under the given definition.
That only leaves one...
Leaving me to wonder why you continue to deny the obvious.
I am not letting you off the hook with your deliberate vagueness. You won't give the exact answer, along with your defense, because that would mean you would be held accountable to your answer. So instead, you give me non-answers.
It's just the kind of **** you do. I won't stop. **** your loopholes. I don't fall for that ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jul 2025 8:49 pm
@Blackvegetable and one more thing , ****. If you ever do get the sack to answer, we both know exactly how you will defend your answer-your defense will be "that is the one that fits my definition."
Dumb mother ****. That's not a defense. That's a claim. Go into detail as to how, use an example, make a **** argument for once in your disgusting life.
Besides, I will post why your definition applies to all of them anyway. But you have to answer first, coward.
**** retard.
Dumb mother ****. That's not a defense. That's a claim. Go into detail as to how, use an example, make a **** argument for once in your disgusting life.
Besides, I will post why your definition applies to all of them anyway. But you have to answer first, coward.
**** retard.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jul 2025 9:54 pm
A condex is a duplex.ROG62 » 22 Jul 2025, 12:18 am » wrote: ↑ is that where you got conned thinking you weren't buying into a duplex and got conned out of a lot more money?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
22 Jul 2025 10:04 pm
Mine were.
My dad had a brother and a sister, and my mom had a brother and two sisters.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
22 Jul 2025 10:06 pm
You haven't even answered the first question, retard. We're not going to help you sort out several other questions.Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ What type of error IS Survivorship bias?
What is it about the population that makes sampling it subject to Survivorship bias?
Crawl, walk, run, tard.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
22 Jul 2025 10:08 pm
But the crime DID happen.JohnnyYou » 22 Jul 2025, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Ghislaine Maxwell got summoned to Congress to testify on the crime she is in jail for never happened?
She trafficked children to epstein, and then he trafficked them.
To no one.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
22 Jul 2025 10:15 pm
Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2025, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ But the crime DID happen.
She trafficked children to epstein, and then he trafficked them.
To no one.
If the administration is going to finalize their lie by getting her to testify that there was no list nor sex trafficking, then wouldn't that mean they would have to release her?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 5706 users online :: 10 registered, 14 bots, and 5682 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckGo, NING, MQQBrowser, okhttp, proximic, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot