I will listen carefully to anything James O'Keefe has to say about the Epstein case or anything else.
If you got the dictator you wanted I'd be in jail already.
Jail my ***, ***.roadkill » 22 Jul 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑
If you got the dictator you wanted I'd be in jail already.![]()
I cared. I have always defended O'Keefe. I remember when he was a skinny kid displaying the foolhardy courage of youth.roadkill » 22 Jul 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ I will listen carefully to anything James O'Keefe has to say about the Epstein case or anything else.
It's called trust.
Remember when I used to pour O'Keefe videos on this site like gas on a fire. Few here cared.
Thank you for using one of my oldest sources.
Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I cared. I have always defended O'Keefe. I remember when he was a skinny kid displaying the foolhardy courage of youth.
I am gratified that his courage has not abated in spite of the hard lessons life teaches to the courageous young.
Your affinity for him demonstrates the truth of the old adage, "Even a retarded *** is right once a day."
That's because I'm a military ***.roadkill » 22 Jul 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Come on dude...I always told everyone we know that it was twice a day for you.
You missed my meaning.roadkill » 22 Jul 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah...they want an inmate much younger than you. Have you looked at yer cannon lately.
This **** is not gonna go away
in me wonders what false flag will they do to put this on the back burner?Is that what you and YOUR guy do with all the other guys you meet? Just another brick in the wall.Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2025, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You missed my meaning.
If my guy had won, we'd have already put you against a wall.
No jail for you.
I did...Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2025, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ That's because I'm a military ***.
There's 500 and 0500. I'm right twice a day.
You're just a regular ***. Not my fault. You need to take it up with the Lord.
Oh.. please cover your mouth when you cough.
James O'Keefe has never proven himself more than a fraud since he did that Acorn story in 2009.
No, just you ***.roadkill » 22 Jul 2025, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that what you and YOUR guy do with all the other guys you meet? Just another brick in the wall.
Your problem with O'Keefe did not originate with anything O'keefe ever did.JohnnyYou » 22 Jul 2025, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh.. please cover your mouth when you cough.
Man I ain;t gargling no O'Keefe at this point.
I want to know when Ghislaine Maxwell will testify before Congress
I ain't got time for pointing the Cannon of Distraction in the wrong pointed direction
Name the elements of the acorn story that were factually false.*31stArrival » 22 Jul 2025, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ James O'Keefe has never proven himself more than a fraud since he did that Acorn story in 2009.
I responded without vetting who O'Keefe was too. On vetting, I am am even more sure I don't have much time. But you brought visibility so I will try.Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2025, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Your problem with O'Keefe did not originate with anything O'keefe ever did.
You are controlled, son.
When O'keefe first came on the scene, I was still batting for the pink team. They had not yet made it clear that they were obsessed with sexualizing children, giving children sexual agency, exposing children to things they were too young to evaluate, etc. As a man involved in blue collar work for much of my life and all of my ute, supporting labor was a gimme. After clinton, the dems became wall street, but I was still just generally a liberal - an FDR Democrat is how I would describe it. And then the party went racist and pervert, and at that same time I got red pilled on a few things. From the very, very first, I saw climate change aspolitics not science,and I still do.
Anyway, I had heard every terrible thing about O'Keefe, and I went to watch his **** in order to mock and jeer and **** down the necks of the conjobs on the old board. Well, that didn't go as expected, because what I saw was a courageous young man willing to put himself at risk to get to the truth. His perception of truth and mine might differ, but his integrity was clear to me in spite of all the hit jobs from the left and all of the instructions I was given to hate him.
You remain controlled, even after all of these years. James O'Keefe's takedowns of the left, while purely partisan, have been epic and factually grounded. And here he is taking down Trump, and you still ******-out like a teenager confronted with broccoli, never having tried broccoli.
What separates actual time evolving from factual relative time logistics directing artificial tomorrows 7 days a week every 365.2422 rotations each planetary revolution around the star of this unique solar system perpetually balancing in the universal moment here?Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2025, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Name the elements of the acorn story that were factually false.
If you can - and leave your **** ancestors out of it.