Liberal Forum

https://x.com/DumbObservation/status/19 ... 2263144887

In case anyone is confused why R “Eggplant” Suave laughs at retards who believed the “Qatar is giving us $1.2T investment!!!11”


         

https://x.com/David_Tracey/status/1922702381470368011
 
 

I heard The Phillipines will pay the 90% tariff on their exports to the US and have zero percent on what we sell them.

I did not Marcos son had replaced Dutuerte??? What a cheesy little guy Ferdinand Marcos looked like;
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jul 2025, 12:31 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 12:31 am

In case anyone is confused why R “Eggplant” Suave laughs at retards who believed the “Qatar is giving us $1.2T investment!!!11”

         

https://x.com/David_Tracey/status/1922702381470368011

"giving"? speaking of tards....  

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/ ... -in-qatar/
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jul 2025, 12:28 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 12:28 am

https://x.com/DumbObservation/status/19 ... 2263144887

It's like an Idiocy Feedback Loop.


 

ROG62 » 23 Jul 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 6:02 am

"giving"? speaking of tards....  

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/ ... -in-qatar/

Here's the steaming pile right out of the horse's ***...


Good Toady!

ROG62 » 23 Jul 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 6:02 am

"giving"? speaking of tards....  

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/ ... -in-qatar/

Did you also believe “90 deals in 90 days?”

He’s 80-85 short as of July 23rd, well past the deadline…  
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jul 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 8:09 am

Did you also believe “90 deals in 90 days?”

He’s 80-85 short as of July 23rd, well past the deadline…

Never crossed my desk...  

$1.2 trillion...is that cash, 1, 5, 10 years? 

did I read they have the largest LNG field on the planet?

did Qatar sign the deal?

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 6:10 am

Here's the steaming pile right out of the horse's ***...

Good Toady!

what are you bringing to the table?

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 6:08 am

It's like an Idiocy Feedback Loop.

Speaking of your idiocy:



1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors


 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 9:12 am

Speaking of idiocy:



 

Yea....get a load of this ****...

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

or

you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 


Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

   

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 9:40 am

Yea....get a load of this ****...

or

Didn't read it. 

Always needing to copy/paste. You can never just give your own thoughts , can you? 


1. "even you won't read..." blah blah blah...'I will not entertain your stalking...etc...etc...etc...

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 10:20 am

Didn't read it. 


 

Nobody reads your ****.

ROG62 » 23 Jul 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 8:38 am

what are you bringing to the table?

A critical faculty..

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:33 am

Nobody reads your ****.

Clearly you do, since you copy/paste it. 
 

ROG62 » 23 Jul 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 8:37 am

Never crossed my desk...  

$1.2 trillion...is that cash, 1, 5, 10 years? 

did I read they have the largest LNG field on the planet?

did Qatar sign the deal?

Whooooaa...

You ran from the question....then asked 3...

 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:38 am

Clearly you do, since you copy/paste it.

No need..

Your cowardice is predictable..

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:39 am

Whooooaa...

You ran from the question....then asked 3...

Given that you have run from questions since 2017, your whining about not receiving answers is laughable. 

Stick your hypocrisy clear up your ***. 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:43 am

Given that you have run from questions since 2017, your whining about not receiving answers is laughable. 

Stick your hypocrisy clear up your ***.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:42 am

No need..

Your cowardice is predictable..

You literally just read what I wrote. 

Look...you are a **** moron. You box yourself in everyday. You checkmate yourself everyday. 

Just stop already. It's embarrassing.